IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6876-d1712423.html

Spatio-Temporal Dynamics, Driving Mechanisms, and Decoupling Evaluation of Farmland Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Sun

    (State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Key Laboratory of Wastes Matrix Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
    National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-Alkali Land, Dongying 257347, China)

  • Ran Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Key Laboratory of Wastes Matrix Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Zichao Zhao

    (State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Key Laboratory of Wastes Matrix Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
    National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-Alkali Land, Dongying 257347, China)

  • Bing Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Key Laboratory of Wastes Matrix Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Meng Ma

    (State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Key Laboratory of Wastes Matrix Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Li Yao

    (State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Key Laboratory of Wastes Matrix Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Xinhao Gao

    (State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, Key Laboratory of Wastes Matrix Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
    National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-Alkali Land, Dongying 257347, China)

Abstract

Understanding the spatio-temporal evolution of farmland carbon emissions, disentangling their underlying driving forces, and exploring the decoupling relationship between these emissions and economic development are pivotal to advancing low-carbon and high-quality agricultural development in Shandong Province, China. Using the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) and Tapio decoupling model, this study conducted a comprehensive analysis of panel data from 16 cities in Shandong Province spanning 2004–2023. This research reveals that the total farmland carbon emissions in Shandong Province followed a trajectory of “initial fluctuating increase and subsequent steady decline” during the study period. The emissions peaked at 29.4 million tons in 2007 and then declined to 20.2 million tons in 2023, representing a 26.0% reduction compared to the 2004 level. Farmland carbon emission intensity in Shandong Province showed an overall downward trend over the period 2004–2023, with the 2023 intensity registering a 68.9% decline compared to 2004. The carbon emission intensity, agricultural structure, and labor effects acted as inhibiting factors on farmland carbon emissions in Shandong Province, while the economic development effect exerted a positive driving impact on the growth of such emissions. Over the 20-year period, these four factors cumulatively contributed to a reduction of 2.1 × 10 5 tons in farmland carbon emissions. During 2004–2013, the farmland carbon emissions in Zaozhuang, Yantai, Jining, Linyi, Dezhou, Liaocheng, and Heze showed a weak decoupling state, while in 2014–2023, the farmland carbon emissions and economic development in all cities of Shandong Province showed a strong decoupling state. In the future, it is feasible to reduce farmland carbon emissions in Shandong Province by improving agricultural resource utilization efficiency through technological progress, adopting advanced low-carbon technologies, and promoting the transformation of agricultural industrial structures towards “high-value and low-carbon” designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Sun & Ran Li & Zichao Zhao & Bing Guo & Meng Ma & Li Yao & Xinhao Gao, 2025. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics, Driving Mechanisms, and Decoupling Evaluation of Farmland Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6876-:d:1712423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ang, B.W., 2015. "LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 233-238.
    2. Luhao Jia & Mingya Wang & Shili Yang & Fan Zhang & Yidong Wang & Penghao Li & Wanqi Ma & Shaobo Sui & Tong Liu & Mingshi Wang, 2024. "Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Emissions and Carbon Sinks in the Yellow River Basin Based on LMDI and Tapio Decoupling Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Camilo Mora & Daniele Spirandelli & Erik C. Franklin & John Lynham & Michael B. Kantar & Wendy Miles & Charlotte Z. Smith & Kelle Freel & Jade Moy & Leo V. Louis & Evan W. Barba & Keith Bettinger & Ab, 2018. "Broad threat to humanity from cumulative climate hazards intensified by greenhouse gas emissions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(12), pages 1062-1071, December.
    4. Guanghe Han & Jiahui Xu & Xin Zhang & Xin Pan, 2024. "Efficiency and Driving Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: A Study in Chinese State Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Yihui Chen & Minjie Li & Kai Su & Xiaoyong Li, 2019. "Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of the Driving Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from Fujian, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Yong Zhu & Congjia Huo, 2022. "The Impact of Agricultural Production Efficiency on Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Akila Wijerathna-Yapa & Ranjith Pathirana, 2022. "Sustainable Agro-Food Systems for Addressing Climate Change and Food Security," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, September.
    8. Athanasios Balafoutis & Bert Beck & Spyros Fountas & Jurgen Vangeyte & Tamme Van der Wal & Iria Soto & Manuel Gómez-Barbero & Andrew Barnes & Vera Eory, 2017. "Precision Agriculture Technologies Positively Contributing to GHG Emissions Mitigation, Farm Productivity and Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, July.
    9. Antonella Vastola & Mauro Viccaro & Valeria Grippo & Francesco Genovese & Severino Romano & Mario Cozzi, 2023. "The Decoupling Effect in Italian Agricultural Waste: An Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Hao, Yu & Zhang, Zong-Yong & Yang, Chuxiao & Wu, Haitao, 2021. "Does structural labor change affect CO2 emissions? Theoretical and empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Daiva Makutėnienė & Dalia Perkumienė & Valdemaras Makutėnas, 2022. "Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index Decomposition Based on Kaya Identity of GHG Emissions from Agricultural Sector in Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Lin Zhang & Jinyan Chen & Faustino Dinis & Sha Wei & Chengzhi Cai, 2022. "Decoupling Effect, Driving Factors and Prediction Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Emission Reduction and Product Supply Guarantee in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Xieqihua Liu & Yongmei Ye & Dongdong Ge & Zhen Wang & Bin Liu, 2022. "Study on the Evolution and Trends of Agricultural Carbon Emission Intensity and Agricultural Economic Development Levels—Evidence from Jiangxi Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weini Chen & Dejun Han & Yu Zhan & Bo Chen, 2025. "The Impact of Rural Population Decline on the Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of the Contiguous Karst Areas in Yunnan–Guizhou Provinces, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Shiyi Feng & Yunfei Long & Rizwana Yasmeen & Hui Yang, 2025. "The Spatial Spillover Impact of Digital Finance on Agricultural Carbon Emission Intensity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Xidong Zhang & Juan Zhang & Chengbo Yang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China, 2000–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Huae Dang & Yuanjie Deng & Yifeng Hai & Hang Chen & Wenjing Wang & Miao Zhang & Xingyang Liu & Can Yang & Minghong Peng & Dingdi Jize & Mei Zhang & Long He, 2025. "Integrating Geodetector and GTWR to Unveil Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in China’s Agricultural Carbon Emissions Under the Dual Carbon Goals," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-33, June.
    5. Guanghe Han & Jiahui Xu & Xin Zhang & Xin Pan, 2024. "Efficiency and Driving Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: A Study in Chinese State Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Luhao Jia & Mingya Wang & Shili Yang & Fan Zhang & Yidong Wang & Penghao Li & Wanqi Ma & Shaobo Sui & Tong Liu & Mingshi Wang, 2024. "Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Emissions and Carbon Sinks in the Yellow River Basin Based on LMDI and Tapio Decoupling Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, January.
    7. Chen, Jiandong & Xu, Chong & Huang, Shuo & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & Wang, Shiqi, 2022. "Adjusted carbon intensity in China: Trend, driver, and network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    8. Li, Xiang & Chen, Beizi & Liu, Haijun & Xu, Mengqi & Yang, Haijun, 2025. "Characteristics of agricultural carbon emissions in arid zones, drivers and decoupling effects: evidence from Xinjiang, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    9. Xixian Zheng & Haixia Tan & Wenmei Liao, 2025. "Spatiotemporal evolution of factors affecting agricultural carbon emissions: empirical evidence from 31 Chinese provinces," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 10909-10943, May.
    10. Zhiyuan Zhang & Huiyan Qin, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Carbon Emission Efficiency and Influencing Factors in the Five Major Maize Producing Areas of China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Jinyu Han & Jiansheng Qu & Dai Wang & Tek Narayan Maraseni, 2023. "Accounting for and Comparison of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions between Crop and Livestock Sectors in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Marco Ammoniaci & Simon-Paolo Kartsiotis & Rita Perria & Paolo Storchi, 2021. "State of the Art of Monitoring Technologies and Data Processing for Precision Viticulture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Cai, Angzu & Wang, Leyi & Zhang, Yuhao & Wu, Haoran & Zhang, Huai & Guo, Ru & Wu, Jiang, 2025. "Uncovering the multiple socio-economic driving factors of carbon emissions in nine urban agglomerations of China based on machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    14. Hongyang Qiao & Sanmang Wu, 2025. "Decoupling Factor Analysis for Sustainable Development in China’s Four Municipalities Using the Tapio Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Zhu, Bangzhu & Su, Bin & Li, Yingzhu & Ng, Tsan Sheng, 2020. "Embodied energy and intensity in China’s (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2005-2015," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Jia Chen & Kuan Zhang, 2024. "Analysis on the spatiotemporal pattern and driving force of the spatial deviation index of grain and economy in counties in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Jing Bai & Chuang Tu & Jiming Bai, 2024. "Measuring and decomposing Beijing’s energy performance: an energy- and exergy-based perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17617-17633, July.
    18. Jérôme Hambye-Verbrugghen & Stefano Bianchini & Paul E Brockway & Emmanuel Aramendia & Matthew K Heun & Zeke Marshall, 2025. "From twin transition to twice the burden? Digitalisation, energy demand, and economic growth," Post-Print hal-05460038, HAL.
    19. Yan Li & Yigang Wei & Hanxiao Xu & Huanwen Liu & Julien Chevallier, 2023. "Carbon monoxide and multi‐pollutants flow between China and India: A multiregional input–output model," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 2514-2537, August.
    20. Trotta, Gianluca, 2020. "Assessing energy efficiency improvements and related energy security and climate benefits in Finland: An ex post multi-sectoral decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6876-:d:1712423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.