IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6414-d1700717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and Social Benefits of Urban Parking Space Shortages Mitigation Management Model: A System Dynamics and Nudge Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Chen

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Jiangjun Avenue, Nanjing 211106, China
    College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, 15 Longzi Lake Campus, Zhengzhou East New District, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Zhengyang Xu

    (College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, 15 Longzi Lake Campus, Zhengzhou East New District, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Kang Tian

    (College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, 15 Longzi Lake Campus, Zhengzhou East New District, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Shuwei Jia

    (College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, 15 Longzi Lake Campus, Zhengzhou East New District, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

Abstract

With the growth of the urban population and economic level, the issue of urban parking space shortages (UPSSs) has assumed growing prominence. This persistent issue not only exacerbates traffic congestion but also contributes to environmental pollution, highlighting the need for system-oriented mitigation strategies. First, an algorithm for mitigating UPSSs based on nudge theory was constructed, in order to determine how the nudge strategies work. Second, nudge tools, including gain disclosure, salience, and outcome notification, were integrated to construct a mitigation model for UPSSs, which synthesizes nudge theory, the model of self-regulatory processes involved in behavioral change, and system dynamics (NT-SPBC-SD theory). Finally, four scenarios of natural development, guide adjustment, balanced regulation, and enhanced change were simulated. The findings of this study are as follows: (1) The UPSS mitigation had multiple overlapping effects and critical point effects, and the nudge strategy gradually decayed or even rebounded over time. (2) Under the enhanced change scenario, the degree of UPSSs, the amount of illegal parking, and CO 2 emissions from civil vehicles decreased by 21.2%, 6.93%, and 14.54%, respectively. (3) After quantitative comparisons, the balanced regulation scenario with lower implementation costs instead demonstrated superior overall performance. The results support subsequent research and guide the enhancement of urban parking management policies to advance urban sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Chen & Zhengyang Xu & Kang Tian & Shuwei Jia, 2025. "Environmental and Social Benefits of Urban Parking Space Shortages Mitigation Management Model: A System Dynamics and Nudge Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6414-:d:1700717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaker, David & Zheng, Yanding & Walker, Joan, 2010. "Experimental Economics in Transportation: A Focus on Social Influences and the Provision of Information," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7vg9m3r1, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Ottosson, Dadi Baldur & Chen, Cynthia & Wang, Tingting & Lin, Haiyun, 2013. "The sensitivity of on-street parking demand in response to price changes: A case study in Seattle, WA," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 222-232.
    3. Michiko Namazu & Jiaying Zhao & Hadi Dowlatabadi, 2018. "Nudging for responsible carsharing: using behavioral economics to change transportation behavior," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 105-119, January.
    4. Yan, Xiang & Levine, Jonathan & Marans, Robert, 2019. "The effectiveness of parking policies to reduce parking demand pressure and car use," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 41-50.
    5. Navid Nadimi & Mohammad Ali Zayandehroodi & Rosalia Camporeale & Morteza Asadamraji, 2023. "A Framework for Providing Information about Parking Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Liu, Jingkuang & Li, Yuxuan & Wang, Zhenshuang, 2023. "The potential for carbon reduction in construction waste sorting: A dynamic simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Cass Sunstein, 2014. "Nudging: A Very Short Guide," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 583-588, December.
    8. Zhao, Xiaolei & Zhao, Ziyao & Mao, Yumeng & Li, Xuemei, 2024. "The role of air pollution in electric vehicle adoption: Evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 26-39.
    9. Benjamin Korder & Julien Maheut & Matthias Konle, 2024. "Simulation Methods and Digital Strategies for Supply Chains Facing Disruptions: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-31, July.
    10. Fang Zong & Meng Zeng & Ping Yu, 2024. "A parking pricing scheme considering parking dynamics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1349-1371, August.
    11. Tim Schwanen, 2021. "Achieving just transitions to low-carbon urban mobility," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 685-687, July.
    12. Su, Qing & Zhou, Liren, 2012. "Parking management, financial subsidies to alternatives to drive alone and commute mode choices in Seattle," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 88-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khordagui, Nagwa, 2019. "Parking prices and the decision to drive to work: Evidence from California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 479-495.
    2. Fang Zong & Meng Zeng & Ping Yu, 2024. "A parking pricing scheme considering parking dynamics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1349-1371, August.
    3. Su, Duan & Wang, Yacan & Yang, Nan & Wang, Xianghong, 2020. "Promoting considerate parking behavior in dockless bike-sharing: An experimental study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 153-165.
    4. Kadkhodaei, Masoud & Shad, Rouzbeh & Ziaee, Seyed Ali & Kadkhodaei, Mohsen, 2023. "Prediction model for drivers' tendency to perpetrate a double parking violation on urban trips," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 331-339.
    5. Kadkhodaei, Masoud & Shad, Rouzbeh & Ziaee, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Affecting factors of double parking violations on urban trips," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 80-88.
    6. Parmar, Janak & Saiyed, Gulnazbanu & Dave, Sanjaykumar, 2023. "Analysis of taste heterogeneity in commuters’ travel decisions using joint parking– and mode–choice model: A case from urban India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Niu, Zhipeng & Hu, Xiaowei & Fatmi, Mahmudur & Qi, Shouming & Wang, Siqing & Yang, Haihua & An, Shi, 2023. "Parking occupancy prediction under COVID-19 anti-pandemic policies: A model based on a policy-aware temporal convolutional network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Vivek Choudhary & Masha Shunko & Serguei Netessine & Seongjoon Koo, 2022. "Nudging Drivers to Safety: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4196-4214, June.
    9. Gössling, Stefan & Humpe, Andreas & Hologa, Rafael & Riach, Nils & Freytag, Tim, 2022. "Parking violations as an economic gamble for public space," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 248-257.
    10. Wang, Hao & Li, Ruimin & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Shang, Pan, 2020. "Effect of on-street parking pricing policies on parking characteristics: A case study of Nanning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 65-78.
    11. Mehzabin Tuli, Farzana & Mitra, Suman & Crews, Mariah B., 2021. "Factors influencing the usage of shared E-scooters in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 164-185.
    12. Edmond Daramy-Williams & Jillian Anable & Susan Grant-Muller, 2019. "Car Use: Intentional, Habitual, or Both? Insights from Anscombe and the Mobility Biography Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Julie Bulteau & Thierry Feuillet & Sophie Dantan & Souhir Abbes, 2023. "Encouraging carpooling for commuting in the Paris area (France): which incentives and for whom?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 43-62, February.
    14. Jun Guan Neoh & Maxwell Chipulu & Alasdair Marshall, 2017. "What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 423-447, March.
    15. Hakim Hammadou & Claire Papaix, 2015. "Policy packages for modal shift and CO2 reduction in Lille, France," Working Papers 1501, Chaire Economie du climat.
    16. repec:ags:aaea22:335733 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Shumon Zihady, 2023. "Dupchanchia Model of Students' drop-out control through engagement and appreciation after Covid-19: A Behavioral Policy intervention in the field administration of Bangladesh," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 43(1), pages 136-148, May.
    18. Gillitzer, Christian & Sinning, Mathias, 2020. "Nudging businesses to pay their taxes: Does timing matter?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 284-300.
    19. Víctor Hugo de la Cruz Madrigal & Liliana Avelar Sosa & Jose-Manuel Mejía-Muñoz & Jorge Luis García Alcaraz & Emilio Jiménez Macías, 2025. "Dynamical System Modeling for Disruption in Supply Chain and Its Detection Using a Data-Driven Deep Learning-Based Architecture," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen & Hatzopoulou, Marianne, 2017. "Quantifying the value of a clean ride: How far would you bicycle to avoid exposure to traffic-related air pollution?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 66-78.
    21. Adele Quigley-McBride & Gregory Franco & Daniel Bruce McLaren & Antonia Mantonakis & Maryanne Garry, 2018. "In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6414-:d:1700717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.