IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6282-d1697875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Traditional Public Transport: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of First and Last-Mile AV Solutions in Periurban Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Félix Carreyre

    (Institut VEDECOM, 23 bis Allée des Marronniers, 78000 Versailles, France
    Laboratoire Ville Mobilité Transport, Ecole des Ponts, Université Gustave Eiffel, 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France)

  • Tarek Chouaki

    (Laboratoire Génie Industriel, CentraleSupelec, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Institut de Recherche Technologique SystemX, 2 Boulevard Thomas Gobert, 91120 Palaiseau, France)

  • Nicolas Coulombel

    (Laboratoire Ville Mobilité Transport, Ecole des Ponts, Université Gustave Eiffel, 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France)

  • Jaâfar Berrada

    (Institut VEDECOM, 23 bis Allée des Marronniers, 78000 Versailles, France)

  • Laurent Bouillaut

    (COSYS/GRETTIA, Université Gustave Eiffel, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, France)

  • Sebastian Hörl

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique SystemX, 2 Boulevard Thomas Gobert, 91120 Palaiseau, France)

Abstract

With the advent of Autonomous Vehicles (AV) technology, extensive research around the design of on-demand mobility systems powered by such vehicles is performed. An important part of these studies consists in the evaluation of the economic impact of such systems for involved stakeholders. In this work, a cost–benefit analysis (CBA) is applied to the introduction of AV services in Paris-Saclay, an intercommunity, south of Paris, simulated through MATSim, an agent-based model capable of capturing complex travel behaviors and dynamic traffic interactions. AVs would be implemented as a feeder service, first- and last-mile service to public transit, allowing intermodal trips for travelers. The system is designed to target the challenges of public transport accessibility in periurban areas and high private car use, which the AV feeder service is designed to mitigate. To our knowledge, this study is one of the first CBA analyses of an intermodal AV system relying on an agent-based simulation. The introduction of AV in a periurban environment would generate more pressure on the road network (0.8% to 1.7% increase in VKT for all modes, and significant congestion around train stations) but would improve traveler utilities. The utility gains from the new AV users benefiting from a more comfortable mode offsets the longer travel times from private car users. A Stop-Based routing service generates less congestion than a Door-to-Door routing service, but the access/egress time counterbalances this gain. Finally, in a periurban environment where on-demand AV feeder service would be added to reduce the access and egress cost of public transit, the social impact would be nuanced for travelers (over 99% of gains captured by the 10% of most benefiting agents), but externality would increase. This would benefit some travelers but would also involve additional congestion. In that case, a Stop-Based routing on a constrained network (e.g., existing bus network) significantly improves economic viability and reduces infrastructure costs and would be less impacting than a Door-to-Door service.

Suggested Citation

  • Félix Carreyre & Tarek Chouaki & Nicolas Coulombel & Jaâfar Berrada & Laurent Bouillaut & Sebastian Hörl, 2025. "Beyond Traditional Public Transport: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of First and Last-Mile AV Solutions in Periurban Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6282-:d:1697875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Börjesson & Jonas Eliasson, 2019. "Should values of time be differentiated?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 357-375, May.
    2. Jaâfar Berrada & Alexis Poulhès, 2021. "Economic and socioeconomic assessment of replacing conventional public transit with demand responsive transit services in low-to-medium density areas," Post-Print hal-03325200, HAL.
    3. Long T. Truong & Chris Gruyter & Graham Currie & Alexa Delbosc, 2017. "Estimating the trip generation impacts of autonomous vehicles on car travel in Victoria, Australia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1279-1292, November.
    4. Liu, Feiqi & Zhao, Fuquan & Liu, Zongwei & Hao, Han, 2019. "Can autonomous vehicle reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A country-level evaluation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 462-473.
    5. Laima Naujokienė & Valentina Peleckienė & Kristina Vaičiūtė & Kristina Kulikauskienė, 2025. "Research on the Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on the Environment and Sustainability of Transport Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Aybike Ongel & Erik Loewer & Felix Roemer & Ganesh Sethuraman & Fengqi Chang & Markus Lienkamp, 2019. "Economic Assessment of Autonomous Electric Microtransit Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Alessandro La Delfa & Zheng Han, 2025. "Sustainable Mobility and Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Literature Review of Travel Behavior Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-39, March.
    8. Berrada, Jaâfar & Poulhès, Alexis, 2021. "Economic and socioeconomic assessment of replacing conventional public transit with demand responsive transit services in low-to-medium density areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 317-334.
    9. Wadud, Zia & Mattioli, Giulio, 2021. "Fully automated vehicles: A cost-based analysis of the share of ownership and mobility services, and its socio-economic determinants," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 228-244.
    10. Bösch, Patrick M. & Becker, Felix & Becker, Henrik & Axhausen, Kay W., 2018. "Cost-based analysis of autonomous mobility services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 76-91.
    11. Félix Carreyre & Tarek Chouaki & Nicolas Coulombel & Jaâfar Berrada & Laurent Bouillaut & Sebastian Hörl, 2022. "On-Demand Autonomous Vehicles in Berlin: A Cost–Benefit Analysis," Post-Print hal-04515378, HAL.
    12. Boadway, Robin W, 1974. "The Welfare Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 84(336), pages 926-939, December.
    13. Kaddoura, Ihab & Bischoff, Joschka & Nagel, Kai, 2020. "Towards welfare optimal operation of innovative mobility concepts: External cost pricing in a world of shared autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 48-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zarbakhshnia, Navid & Ma, Zhenliang, 2024. "Critical success factors for the adoption of AVs in sustainable urban transportation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 62-76.
    2. Nikolaos Gavanas & Konstantina Anastasiadou & Eftihia Nathanail & Socrates Basbas, 2024. "Transport Policy Pathways for Autonomous Road Vehicles to Promote Sustainable Urban Development in the European Union: A Multicriteria Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Peer, Stefanie & Müller, Johannes & Naqvi, Asjad & Straub, Markus, 2024. "Introducing shared, electric, autonomous vehicles (SAEVs) in sub-urban zones: Simulating the case of Vienna," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 232-243.
    4. He, Dongdong & Guan, Wei, 2023. "Promoting service quality with incentive contracts in rural bus integrated passenger-freight service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Zwick, Felix & Kuehnel, Nico & Hörl, Sebastian, 2022. "Shifts in perspective: Operational aspects in (non-)autonomous ride-pooling simulations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 300-320.
    6. Badia, Hugo & Jenelius, Erik, 2021. "Design and operation of feeder systems in the era of automated and electric buses," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 146-172.
    7. Becker, Henrik & Becker, Felix & Abe, Ryosuke & Bekhor, Shlomo & Belgiawan, Prawira F. & Compostella, Junia & Frazzoli, Emilio & Fulton, Lewis M. & Guggisberg Bicudo, Davi & Murthy Gurumurthy, Krishna, 2020. "Impact of vehicle automation and electric propulsion on production costs for mobility services worldwide," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 105-126.
    8. Simone Pettigrew & Leon Booth & Victoria Farrar & Branislava Godic & Julie Brown & Charles Karl & Jason Thompson, 2022. "Walking in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Alejandro Tirachini, 2020. "Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2011-2047, August.
    10. Kaddoura, Ihab & Bischoff, Joschka & Nagel, Kai, 2020. "Towards welfare optimal operation of innovative mobility concepts: External cost pricing in a world of shared autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 48-63.
    11. He, Dongdong & Ceder, Avishai (Avi) & Zhang, Wenyi & Guan, Wei & Qi, Geqi, 2023. "Optimization of a rural bus service integrated with e-commerce deliveries guided by a new sustainable policy in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Félix Carreyre & Nicolas Coulombel & Jaâfar Berrada & Laurent Bouillaut, 2022. "Economic evaluation of autonomous passenger transportation services: a systematic review and meta-analysis of simulation studies," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 89-138.
    13. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    14. Kassens-Noor, Eva & Dake, Dana & Decaminada, Travis & Kotval-K, Zeenat & Qu, Teresa & Wilson, Mark & Pentland, Brian, 2020. "Sociomobility of the 21st century: Autonomous vehicles, planning, and the future city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 329-335.
    15. Fabio Antonialli & Sylvie Mira-Bonnardel & Julie Bulteau, 2021. "Economic Assessment of Services with Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles: EASI-AV," Post-Print hal-04369852, HAL.
    16. Kaplan, Leah & Nurullaeva, Lola & Helveston, John Paul, 2024. "Modeling the operational and labor costs of autonomous robotaxi services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 108-119.
    17. Yilun Chen & Nirajan Shiwakoti & Peter Stasinopoulos & Shah Khalid Khan, 2022. "State-of-the-Art of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Automated Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, May.
    18. Zheng, Yan & Deng, Anxin & Yin, Zijuan & Li, Wenquan, 2024. "Assessing travelers’ preferences for online bus-hailing service across various travel distances: Insights from Chinese metropolitan areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    19. Tirachini, Alejandro & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2020. "The economics of automated public transport: Effects on operator cost, travel time, fare and subsidy," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    20. Ma, Jiaxin & Chen, Xumei & Xing, Ziwen & Zhang, Yixin & Yu, Lei, 2023. "Improving the performance of airport shuttle through demand-responsive service with dynamic fare strategy considering mixed demand," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6282-:d:1697875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.