IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6151-d1694897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of ESG on Firm Performance in the MENAT Region: Does Audit Quality Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Eman Fathi Attia

    (Accounting Department, College of Business Administration, University of Business and Technology, Jeddah P.O.Box 21448, Saudi Arabia
    Accounting and Finance Department, College of Management and Technology, Arab Academy for Science & Technology and Maritime, Cairo P.O.Box 12577, Egypt)

  • Ahmed Almoneef

    (Accounting Department, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh P.O.Box 11587, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to examine the impact of the environmental, social and governance (ESG) pillars on financial performance. To do so, we constructed a sample of 126 non-financial companies in the MENAT region between 2017 and 2023. To estimate this relationship, we used the system GMM method, addressing endogeneity concerns like reverse causality, unobserved heterogeneity and dynamic panel bias. The empirical evidence confirms that environmental and social pillars positively and significantly contribute to financial performance, highlighting their strategic role in value creation. The governance pillar, however, does not appear to influence financial performance directly, suggesting that the governance processes within the region are not efficient enough to lead to substantial financial impacts. Of greater significance, though, are the positive and significant effects of interactions between audit quality and ESG, such that good audit practice can increase the effectiveness of ESG efforts in terms of affecting financial performance. The results may be useful for policy makers and company managers in the MENAT countries by increasing ESG performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Eman Fathi Attia & Ahmed Almoneef, 2025. "Impact of ESG on Firm Performance in the MENAT Region: Does Audit Quality Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6151-:d:1694897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puji Handayati & Yeut Hong Tham & Yuni Yuningsih & Zhiyue Sun & Tatas Ridho Nugroho & Sulis Rochayatun, 2025. "ESG Performance and Corporate Governance—The Moderating Role of the Big Four Auditors," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    3. Ahmed Chafai & Wafa Khémiri & Rewayda Tobar & Eman Fathi Attia & Hady Omar Abozeid, 2024. "The moderating effect of audit quality on the relationship between financial inclusion and corporate investment: new evidence from the Middle East and North Africa region," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2378121-237, December.
    4. Weijia Hu & Rui Du & Yu-En Lin & Gui-Ling Huang, 2025. "Measuring the unmeasurable: CSR divergence and future stock price crash risk," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 248-258, January.
    5. Iain J. Fraser & Julia Schwarzkopf & Martin Müller, 2020. "Exploring Supplier Sustainability Audit Standards: Potential for and Barriers to Standardization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-31, October.
    6. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    7. Sun, Guanglin & Yan, Zian & Gong, Zejun & Li, Mengding, 2025. "The impact of ESG rating divergence on stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Shiyu Wu & Xinyi Li & Xiaosen Du & Zexin Li, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Bohyun Yoon & Jeong Hwan Lee & Ryan Byun, 2018. "Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Fama, Eugene F, 1980. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(2), pages 288-307, April.
    11. Kelly Huang & Yanglin Li & Kabir Oyewale & Emily Tworoger, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from America’s Best Corporate Citizens," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, July.
    12. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lai Trung Hoang & Cuong Cao Nguyen & Baiding Hu, 2017. "Ownership Structure and Firm Performance Improvement: Does it Matter in the Vietnamese Stock Market?," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 36(4), pages 416-428, December.
    2. Oliver Bischoff & Achim Buchwald, 2018. "Horizontal and Vertical Firm Networks, Corporate Performance and Product Market Competition," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 25-45, March.
    3. María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez & Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez & Inmaculada Bel‐Oms, 2020. "Varieties of capitalism, corporate governance mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement: An overview of coordinated and liberal market economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 731-748, March.
    4. Damian Ward & Igor Filatotchev, 2010. "Principal-principal-agency relationships and the role of external governance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 249-261.
    5. Ratnam Vijayakumaran, 2019. "Agency Costs, Ownership, and Internal Governance Mechanisms: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 133-154, January.
    6. Oumeima Kacem & Sana El Harbi, 2022. "Do risk governance and effective board affect bank performance? Evidence from large banks worldwide," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 461-483, December.
    7. Ujjayini Roy & Indrani Chakraborty, 2023. "Market concentration, agency cost and firm performance: a case study on Indian corporate firms," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2645-2693, August.
    8. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2017. "Ownership concentration, state ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from the Vietnamese stock market," OSF Preprints zgvsw, Center for Open Science.
    9. Massimo Colombo & Annalisa Croce & Samuele Murtinu, 2014. "Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 265-282, February.
    10. Da Teng & Douglas B. Fuller & Chengchun Li, 2018. "Institutional change and corporate governance diversity in China’s SOEs," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 273-293, May.
    11. Stavros E. Arvanitis & Theodoros V. Stamatopoulos & Dimitris Terzakis, 2018. "Is There a Non-linear Relationship of Market Value with Cash and Ownership?," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 68(1), pages 3-25, January-M.
    12. Hu, Juncheng, 2021. "Do facilitation payments affect earnings management? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Surenderrao Komera & P. J. Jijo Lukose, 2016. "Heterogeneity and Asymmetry in Speed of Leverage Adjustment: The Indian Experience," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-26, September.
    14. Estévez-Mendoza, Carlos & Montoro-Sánchez, Ángeles, 2024. "Exploring the relationship between innovation and corporate governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    15. Mukhopadhyay, Jhuma & Chakraborty, Indrani, 2017. "Foreign institutional investment, business groups and firm performance: Evidence from India," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(PA), pages 454-465.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3862 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Wali Ullah, 2017. "Evolving corporate governance and firms performance: evidence from Japanese firms," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-33, February.
    18. Ahmed A. Elamer & Collins G. Ntim & Hussein A. Abdou & Alaa Mansour Zalata & Mohamed Elmagrhi, 2019. "The impact of multi-layer governance on bank risk disclosure in emerging markets: the case of Middle East and North Africa," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 246-281, April.
    19. Attiya Y. Javid & Robina Iqbal, 2010. "Corporate Governance in Pakistan : Corporate Valuation, Ownership and Financing," Governance Working Papers 22830, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    20. Omar Farooque & Wonlop Buachoom & Nam Hoang, 2019. "Interactive effects of executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance: Evidence from an Asian market," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1111-1164, December.
    21. Mohammad A. A. Zaid & Sara T. F. Abuhijleh & María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez, 2020. "Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1344-1360, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6151-:d:1694897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.