IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6013-d1691204.html

Sustainability Effects of Free Trade Zones: Evidence from Water Pollution in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyue Gao

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Junkai Sun

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xindan Zhang

    (School of International Business, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China)

  • Guilin Dai

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Yuhao Liu

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Juyong Zhang

    (School of International Business, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China)

Abstract

Under the collaborative framework of sustainable development and environmental pollution control in China, there is an urgent need to break the governance dilemma of traditional environmental regulations and explore innovative paths for sustainability. This paper empirically tests the direct impact, spatial spillover effects, and mechanisms of free trade zones ( FTZ s) in China in reducing water pollution. Using a spatial Durbin model (SDM) combined with the staggered difference-in-differences (STA-DID) method on a dataset of 266 Chinese cities encompassing eastern, central, and western regions with diverse economic and environmental baselines from 2003 to 2023, the study finds that FTZ s significantly reduce local water pollution by 9.17 million tons of untreated sewage discharge (β = −916.6, p < 0.01), with a spatial spillover effect that decreases pollution in surrounding cities by 12.33 million tons (β = −1232.9, p < 0.01). Upgrading industrial structure, accelerating technological innovation, and strengthening government environmental governance constitute the core mediating channels. This study provides theoretical support for institutional innovation in environmental governance and empirical evidence to address the trade-off between economic growth and environmental protection in China, contributing to the understanding of how context-specific institutional innovations can advance regional sustainability, aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyue Gao & Junkai Sun & Xindan Zhang & Guilin Dai & Yuhao Liu & Juyong Zhang, 2025. "Sustainability Effects of Free Trade Zones: Evidence from Water Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6013-:d:1691204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Shanping & Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada, 2014. "A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN–China Free Trade Area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 138-151.
    2. Min Wang & Youshi He & Jianya Zhou & Kai Ren, 2022. "Evaluating the Effect of Chinese Environmental Regulation on Corporate Sustainability Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Technology Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Jean-Christophe Maur & Jean-Pierre Chauffour, 2011. "Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development : A Handbook," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2329, April.
    4. Lihui Wang & Zhihong Liu & Huailong Shi, 2022. "The Impact of the Pilot Free Trade Zone on Regional Financial Development," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(5), pages 154-184, September.
    5. Bardaka, Eleni & Delgado, Michael S. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2019. "A spatial multiple treatment/multiple outcome difference-in-differences model with an application to urban rail infrastructure and gentrification," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 325-345.
    6. Ju Chen & Guiliang Tian & Jiawen Li & Huijun Xu, 2023. "Research on the Outgoing Audit and Evaluation of Water Resource Assets of Leadership Cadres in City Y," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Fan, Wei & Yan, Ling & Chen, Boyang & Ding, Wangwang & Wang, Ping, 2022. "Environmental governance effects of local environmental protection expenditure in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Lianju Lyu & Daxue Kan & Wenqing Yao & Weichiao Huang, 2022. "Has China’s Pilot Policy of Water Ecological Civilization City Construction Reduced Water Pollution Intensity?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Xu, Shiteng & Shen, Ronghua & Zhang, Yahua & Cai, Yifei, 2024. "Fostering regional innovation efficiency through pilot free trade zones: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 356-367.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Wei & Qiyuan Li & Ruige Sun & Xuan Wang, 2025. "Does the Construction of Free Trade Zones Promote the Development of the Digital Economy? Evidence from Chinese Prefecture-Level Cities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 12943-12968, September.
    2. Chen, Wanling & Hu, Yao & Liu, Bei & Wang, Hui & Zheng, Mingbo, 2022. "Does the establishment of Pilot Free Trade Test Zones promote the transformation and upgradation of trade patterns?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 114-128.
    3. Li, Zhaohua & Pang, Suqin & Zhu, Zhiyun, 2024. "The impact of pilot free trade zones on entrepreneurship: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Zou, Tao & Li, Shasha & Dai, Yixin, 2025. "Does the pilot free trade zone promote “quality improvement and quantity increase” of the city’s export trade?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1323-1341.
    5. Yufen Zhong & Xingyuan Yao & Weiming Lin, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on the Growth of Small and Micro Enterprises: Insights from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Schaak, Henning, 2015. "The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on International Agricultural Trade: A Gravity Application on the Dairy Product Trade and the ASEAN-China-FTA," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 211619, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    7. Kuldeep Kumar Lohani, 2024. "Trade Flow of India with BRICS Countries: A Gravity Model Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(1), pages 22-39, February.
    8. Olga Demidova, 2021. "Methods of spatial econometrics and evaluation of government programs effectiveness," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 64, pages 107-134.
    9. Henglong Zhang & Congying Tian, 2025. "Has the Free Trade Zone Enhanced the Regional Economic Resilience? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Salamat Ali & Richard Kneller & Chris Milner, 2017. "Market-specific trade costs and firm dynamics in Pakistan: Evaluating the US integrated cargo containers control programme," Discussion Papers 2017-02, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    11. Alessandro Bellocchi & Chiara Lodi & Giovanni Marin & Giuseppe Travaglini & Matteo Zavalloni, 2025. "Floods, Public Budgets and Fiscal Resilience: Evidence from Italian Municipalities," SEEDS Working Papers 1625, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Dec 2025.
    12. Cerqua, Augusto & Montalbano, Pierluigi & Temerbulatova, Zhansaya, 2024. "A decade of Eurasian integration: An ex-post non-parametric assessment of the Eurasian economic union," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. He, Ling-Yun & Hu, Ke & Lin, Xi, 2025. "The impact of collaborative governance on air Pollution: Evidence from high-frequency data in Pearl river delta, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    14. Yoon Heo & Nguyen Khanh Doanh, 2020. "Is NAFTA Trade‐Creating or Trade‐Diverting? A System GMM Approach," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(3), pages 222-238, September.
    15. Ga Eun Lee & Innwon Park, 2021. "An ex-post analysis of trade effects of the ASEAN–Korea Free Trade Area (AKFTA) from Korea’s Perspective," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(4), pages 292-313, December.
    16. Xiaoming Zhang & Luping He & Chien‐Chiang Lee, 2026. "Climate Risk and Risk‐Taking of Rural Financial Institutions in China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1957-1978, April.
    17. Lili Yan ING & Olivier CADOT & Janine WALZ, 2016. "Transparency in Non-Tariff Measures : An International Comparison," Working Papers P182, FERDI.
    18. Emiliano Magrini & Pierluigi Montalbano & Silvia Nenci, 2013. "Are the EU trade preferences really effective? A Generalized Propensity Score evaluation of the Southern Mediterranean Countries' case in agriculture and fishery," Working Papers 2/13, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    19. Huang, Qingbo & Zhang, Xiaohan & Li, Yan, 2023. "Study on the economic effects of China and ASEAN countries from the New International Land-Sea Trade Corridor," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 123-135.
    20. Belayet Hossain, 2025. "Does Government Environmental Expenditure Reduce Residential Energy Consumption in Canada? Evidence from Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6013-:d:1691204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.