IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5924-d1688969.html

Evaluating the Use of Alternative Fuels in Cement Production for Environmental Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Taj Wali

    (MEW School of Leadership, Dubai 25315, United Arab Emirates)

  • Azmat Qayum

    (MEW School of Leadership, Dubai 25315, United Arab Emirates)

  • Fahad Algarni

    (Faculty of Computing and Information Science, Department of Computer Science, University of Bisha, Bisha 14174, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fazle Malik

    (Otsuka Pakistan Limited, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Saeed Ullah Jan

    (Higher Education Department of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Government Degree College Wari (Dir Upper), Wari 18200, Pakistan)

Abstract

This study empirically examines the impact of 30% alternative fuel (AF) adoption on the emission of CO 2 to the environment in the UAE cement industry. The researchers employed a quantitative method to robustly analyze secondary data obtained from the 12 cement manufacturing units of the UAE, the International Energy Agency (IEA), the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and peer-reviewed published papers. The researcher’s main focus was on data from 2018 to 2024 and aligned that with the UAE Green Agenda 2030. The data analysis was conducted through a well-known software, the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), and tests like descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression were employed. The correlation analysis showed that there is a strong negative relationship between AF adoption and CO 2 emissions. The test also showed that the relationship is inverse, that is, increasing the adoption rate of AF lowers CO 2 emissions and thus positively impacts the environment. The Pearson correlation analysis (r = −0.82) showed a strong inverse relationship between the independent and dependent variables. This strong relationship was further revealed and confirmed by the regression analysis, and AF as an individual independent variable explained a 67% reduction in CO 2 emission (R 2 = 0.67), while a combination with mediating variables, such as economic incentives and the integration of advanced technologies, further increased the impact to 83%, where the explanatory power jumped to R 2 = 0.83 ( p < 0.001). As the relationship is strongly inverse between the independent and dependent variables, this reinforces the hypothesis that AF adoption is a good strategy to decarbonize the production of cement and make the operations sustainable.

Suggested Citation

  • Taj Wali & Azmat Qayum & Fahad Algarni & Fazle Malik & Saeed Ullah Jan, 2025. "Evaluating the Use of Alternative Fuels in Cement Production for Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5924-:d:1688969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5924/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5924/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Chang & Yu, Xiang & Guan, Yuru, 2022. "A technology-driven pathway to net-zero carbon emissions for China's cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    2. Saunders, Mark N.K. & Bezzina, Frank, 2015. "Reflections on conceptions of research methodology among management academics," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 297-304.
    3. Teixidó, Jordi & Verde, Stefano F. & Nicolli, Francesco, 2019. "The impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on low-carbon technological change: The empirical evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Yasmin El-Hakim & Mohamed Nagib AbouZeid, 2024. "Towards Mitigating Climate Change Negative Impact: The Role of Regulations and Governance in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-34, August.
    5. Shadeedha Mohamed Saradara & Malik Mansoor Ali Khalfan & Abdul Rauf & Rubina Qureshi, 2023. "On The Path towards Sustainable Construction—The Case of the United Arab Emirates: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Jasmina Locke & Jacinta Dsilva & Saniya Zarmukhambetova, 2023. "Decarbonization Strategies in the UAE Built Environment: An Evidence-Based Analysis Using COP26 and COP27 Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasmin El-Hakim & Mohamed Nagib AbouZeid, 2024. "Towards Mitigating Climate Change Negative Impact: The Role of Regulations and Governance in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-34, August.
    2. Minxing Jiang & Yanan Li & Feng Wang & Dong‐Xiao Yang, 2025. "Hybrid Policies for Emission Control Under Asymmetric Information: A Comparative Analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(4), pages 766-776, October.
    3. Grażyna Wojtkowska-Łodej & Elżbieta Jakubów, 2022. "The Role of Clean Generation Technologies in the Energy Transformation in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Tudi, Tayier & Deng, Xinghua & Chen, Lingqing & Ni, Mingjie, 2025. "Unraveling the nexus between emissions trading and corporate carbon outsourcing: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1612-1632.
    5. Qiang Tu & Limei Zuo & Jianlei Mo & Yingnan Wang, 2026. "Carbon pricing, green innovation, and production efficiency—new evidence from China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 1-32, March.
    6. Jinhan Yu & Licheng Sun, 2022. "Supply Chain Emission Reduction Decisions, Considering Overconfidence under Conditions of Carbon Trading Price Volatility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. He, Yong & Jiang, Ruipeng & Liao, Nuo, 2023. "How to promote the Chinese Certified Emission Reduction scheme in the carbon market? A study based on tripartite evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    8. Stefano Clo' & Gianluca Iannucci & Alessandro Tampieri, 2024. "Emission permits and firms' environmental responsibility," Working Papers - Economics wp2024_06.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    9. Thomas Kiptanui Tarus & Joel K Tenai & Joyce Komen, 2020. "Does Ownership Structure Affect Risk Management? Evidence from an Emerging Economy, Kenya," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10.
    10. Wu, Qingyang & Wang, Yaqi & Shen, Guangjun, 2024. "The green bonus of tax incentives: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Lu, Yunguo & Zhang, Lin, 2022. "National mitigation policy and the competitiveness of Chinese firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Maogang Tang & Silu Cheng & Wenqing Guo & Weibiao Ma & Fengxia Hu, 2023. "Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11735-11767, October.
    13. Li, Boyang & Chen, Runze & Du, Yuqin, 2025. "Can ETS pricing policies and clean subsidy policies lead to a cleaner power generation sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    14. Zhang, Wei & Li, Guoxiang & Guo, Fanyong, 2022. "Does carbon emissions trading promote green technology innovation in China?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    15. Yu, Jian & Liu, Peng & Shi, Xunpeng & Ai, Xianneng, 2023. "China’s emissions trading scheme, firms’ R&D investment and emissions reduction," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1021-1037.
    16. M. R. Ibrahim, 2023. "The Missing Link: Exploring the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Change in team members in Construction," Papers 2305.13121, arXiv.org.
    17. Alberto Biancardi & Idiano D’Adamo & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez-Gonzalez & Joaquín Francisco Varela Bascur, 2025. "A Flexible and Circular Management of Copper in Chile: New Perspectives Toward Sustainable Development," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(4), pages 813-837, December.
    18. Bezzina, Frank & Cassar, Vincent & Tracz-Krupa, Katarzyna & Przytuła, Sylwia & Tipurić, Darko, 2017. "Evidence-based human resource management practices in three EU developing member states: Can managers tell truth from fallacy?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 688-700.
    19. Xiangnan Zhai & Xue Yang & Darko B. Vukovic & Daria A. Dinets & Qiang Liu, 2025. "Carbon Emissions Trading Policy and Regional Energy Efficiency: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Leticia S. Ribeiro & Ana Lúcia Nazareth da Silva & Mayara Amario & Carina M. Stolz & Assed N. Haddad & Dieter Thomas Boer, 2024. "Reuse of Steel Residue in Polypropylene Matrices for the Production of Plastic Wood, Aiming at Decarbonization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5924-:d:1688969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.