IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5908-d1688498.html

A Study on the Correlation Between Urbanization and Agricultural Economy Based on Efficiency Measurement and Quantile Regression: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Ye

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Yaoyao Ding

    (School of Design and Art, Communication University of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310019, China)

  • Rong Zhang

    (FutureFront Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yuntao Zou

    (FutureFront Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    School of Computer of Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

The impact of urbanization on the agricultural economy has long attracted scholarly attention. Taking China as a case, this study investigates the relationship between urbanization and agricultural development under the dual progress of urbanization and the rural revitalization strategy. Based on panel data from 31 mainland provinces, this paper measures agricultural economic efficiency using the global slack-based measure (SBM) model and employs quantile regression to systematically analyze the influence of various urbanization factors across different levels of agricultural efficiency. A Tobit regression model is further adopted for robustness checks. The results show that representative urbanization factors, such as the proportion of urban population and the prevalence of higher education, exert significant negative impacts on agricultural efficiency, particularly in regions with higher efficiency levels. Freight volume has a significantly negative effect in regions with medium and low efficiency, while freight turnover negatively impacts medium- to high-efficiency areas. In contrast, improvements in healthcare services and digital infrastructure are found to consistently enhance agricultural efficiency. Although the corporatization of agriculture is often regarded as a key outcome of urbanization, its efficiency-improving effect is not statistically significant in most models and is mainly concentrated in high-efficiency regions. Overall, the improvement in China’s agricultural economic efficiency relies more on direct support from the rural revitalization strategy, while rapid urbanization has failed to bring substantial benefits and has even led to structural negative effects. These adverse outcomes may stem from the rapid occupation of suburban farmland, increased logistics costs due to the relocation of agricultural activities, and the ineffective absorption of surplus rural labor. This study highlights the need for future urbanization policies in China to pay greater attention to the coordinated development of the agricultural economy. The methods and findings of this research also provide reference value for other developing regions facing similar urbanization-agriculture dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Ye & Yaoyao Ding & Rong Zhang & Yuntao Zou, 2025. "A Study on the Correlation Between Urbanization and Agricultural Economy Based on Efficiency Measurement and Quantile Regression: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-32, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5908-:d:1688498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golany, B & Roll, Y, 1989. "An application procedure for DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 237-250.
    2. Jiang, Changjun & Li, Jintao & Liu, Jilai, 2022. "Does urbanization affect the gap between urban and rural areas? Evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    3. Meseret Chanieabate & Hai He & Chuyue Guo & Betelhem Abrahamgeremew & Yuanji Huang, 2023. "Examining the Relationship between Transportation Infrastructure, Urbanization Level and Rural-Urban Income Gap in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Catherine Paul & Richard Nehring & David Banker & Agapi Somwaru, 2004. "Scale Economies and Efficiency in U.S. Agriculture: Are Traditional Farms History?," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 185-205, November.
    5. Bukarica, Vesna & Tomšić, Željko, 2017. "Energy efficiency policy evaluation by moving from techno-economic towards whole society perspective on energy efficiency market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 968-975.
    6. Pengfei Ge & Tan Liu & Xiaoxu Wu & Xiulu Huang, 2023. "Heterogenous Urbanization and Agricultural Green Development Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    8. Dingde Xu & Zhuolin Yong & Xin Deng & Linmei Zhuang & Chen Qing, 2020. "Rural-Urban Migration and its Effect on Land Transfer in Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Junli Gao & Chaofeng Shao & Sihan Chen, 2022. "Evolution and Driving Factors of the Spatiotemporal Pattern of Tourism Efficiency at the Provincial Level in China Based on SBM–DEA Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Zhe Zhao & Pengyu Peng & Fan Zhang & Jiayin Wang & Hongxuan Li, 2022. "The Impact of the Urbanization Process on Agricultural Technical Efficiency in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Jinqi Su & Ke Su & Shubin Wang, 2021. "Does the Digital Economy Promote Industrial Structural Upgrading?—A Test of Mediating Effects Based on Heterogeneous Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Zhen Su & Joshua R. Aaron & William C. McDowell & Dan Dan Lu, 2019. "Sustainable Synergies between the Cultural and Tourism Industries: An Efficiency Evaluation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    14. Justas Streimikis & Zhuang Miao & Tomas Balezentis, 2021. "Creation of climate‐smart and energy‐efficient agriculture in the European Union: Pathways based on the frontier analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 576-589, January.
    15. Asif Reza Anik & Sanzidur Rahman & Jaba Rani Sarker, 2020. "Five Decades of Productivity and Efficiency Changes in World Agriculture (1969–2013)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Zhang & Rong Zhang & Yuntao Zou, 2024. "Urbanization and Cultural Industry Correlation: An Empirical Analysis from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Xiaotuan Li & Panfei Yang & Yuntao Zou, 2023. "An Empirical Investigation of the “Mezzogiorno Trap” in China’s Agricultural Economy: Insights from Data Envelopment Analysis (2015–2021)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-30, September.
    3. Jiayao Li & Rong Zhang & Yuntao Zou, 2024. "Analyzing the Shift in China’s Cultural Industries: From Economic Growth to Social Enrichment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Arsen Benga & Glediana Zeneli (Foto) & María Jesús Delgado‑Rodríguez & Sonia Lucas Santos, 2025. "Company efforts and environmental efficiency: evidence from European railways considering market-based emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 9977-10012, May.
    5. H. Pierre Hsieh & Yueh‐Cheng Wu & Wen‐Min Lu & Yao‐Chieh Chen, 2020. "Assessing and ranking the innovation ability and business performance of global companies in the aerospace and defense industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 952-963, September.
    6. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min & Lin, Bruce J.Y., 2013. "A survey of DEA applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 893-902.
    7. Wang, Chia-Nan & Nguyen, Xuan-Tho & Le, Thi-Dao & Hsueh, Ming-Hsien, 2018. "A partner selection approach for strategic alliance in the global aerospace and defense industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 190-204.
    8. W. Liu & W. Meng & X. Li & D. Zhang, 2010. "DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 177-194, January.
    9. Jamal Ouenniche & Skarleth Carrales, 2018. "Assessing efficiency profiles of UK commercial banks: a DEA analysis with regression-based feedback," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 551-587, July.
    10. Sedghi, Sepideh & Azizi, Shima & Canada, Katherine & Charles, Vincent & Trapp, Andrew C., 2025. "Performance evaluation of child welfare departments using Data Envelopment Analysis: A comparative study across US states," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Mohammad Nourani & Wen‐Min Lu & Irene Wei Kiong Ting, 2020. "Vicarious warfare and dynamic efficiency of companies in the aerospace and defence industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 641-650, June.
    12. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2008. "A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Yue Wu & Dong-Shang Chang, 2024. "Decomposing the comprehensive efficiency of major cities into divisions on governance, ICT and sustainability: network slack-based measure model," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Shih-Heng Yu, 2019. "Benchmarking and Performance Evaluation Towards the Sustainable Development of Regions in Taiwan: A Minimum Distance-Based Measure with Undesirable Outputs in Additive DEA," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 1323-1348, August.
    15. Yu, Ming-Miin & Chen, Li-Hsueh, 2016. "Centralized resource allocation with emission resistance in a two-stage production system: Evidence from a Taiwan’s container shipping company," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 650-671.
    16. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Kai-Chu Yang, 2022. "Multiplicative efficiency aggregation to evaluate Taiwanese local auditing institutions performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1243-1262, August.
    17. Natalia Borisovna Lubsanova & Lyudmila Bato-Zhargalovna Maksanova & Zinaida Sergeevna Eremko & Taisiya Borisovna Bardakhanova & Anna Semenovna Mikheeva, 2022. "The Eco-Efficiency of Russian Regions in North Asia: Their Green Direction of Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Xu Wang & Liyan Han & Libo Yin, 2016. "Environmental Efficiency and Its Determinants for Manufacturing in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins & Luiz Fernando do Nascimento & José Hernando Dulá & Nilson Trevisan Torres & Angela Cristina M. E. Lins, 2025. "Public bidding in government procurement - A new methodology for ranking bid proposals using full dimensional efficient facets of DEA frontier," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 209-222, October.
    20. Chia-Chin Chang & Chia-Syuan Chang, 2023. "Influences of Talent Cultivation and Utilization on the National Human Resource Development System Performance: An International Study Using a Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5908-:d:1688498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.