IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5895-d1688280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Differences in Valued Hotel Green Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Julião

    (Research Centre in Management and Economics, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

  • Inês Monteiro

    (Management Department, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

  • Marcelo Gaspar

    (CDRSP—Centre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic University of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Maria Alice Trindade

    (Information and Operations Management Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

Abstract

This paper aims to compare the perceptions of hotel customers and hotel staff regarding the value of green hotel attributes. By examining both stakeholder groups, the study addresses a gap in sustainable hospitality research, which largely overlooks employee perspectives in favour of customer preferences. An exploratory, cross-sectional survey was conducted using structured questionnaires, administered to hotel guests ( n = 307) and hotel staff ( n = 89) in Porto, Portugal. Respondents rated 15 green hotel attributes using a five-point Likert scale. Demographic data were also collected to analyse perceptual differences across gender, age, income, and education. The results revealed that both customers and staff exhibited environmental awareness, though their prioritisation of specific green practices differed. Customers tended to value visible environmental measures, such as recycling bins, energy-saving light bulbs, and renewable energy signage, while staff placed greater emphasis on operational sustainability aspects, including low-flow plumbing fixtures, refillable soap dispensers, and durable goods used in service areas. These differences reflect the stakeholders’ distinct roles and experiences within the hotel ecosystem. This study enriches the discourse on sustainable hospitality by providing a dual-stakeholder analysis of green hotel attributes using a shared evaluative framework. The findings offer practical insights for hotel managers aligning sustainability strategies with the expectations of both guests and employees, supporting more effective and inclusive green implementation in the lodging sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Julião & Inês Monteiro & Marcelo Gaspar & Maria Alice Trindade, 2025. "Stakeholder Differences in Valued Hotel Green Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5895-:d:1688280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5895/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5895/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ambra Galeazzo & Natalia Ortiz-de-Mandojana & Javier Delgado-Ceballos, 2021. "Green procurement and financial performance in the tourism industry: the moderating role of tourists’ green purchasing behaviour," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 700-716, March.
    2. Lo, Alex Y., 2014. "Negative income effect on perception of long-term environmental risk," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 51-58.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Mansour Alyahia & Alaa M. S. Azazz & Sameh Fayyad & Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Abuelkassem A. A. Mohammad, 2024. "Greenwashing Behavior in Hotels Industry: The Role of Green Transparency and Green Authenticity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Fred C. Pampel, 2014. "The Varied Influence of SES on Environmental Concern," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(1), pages 57-75, March.
    6. Andrej Kirbiš, 2023. "Environmental Attitudes among Youth: How Much Do the Educational Characteristics of Parents and Young People Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Mansour Alyahya & Alaa M. S. Azazz & Mahmoud A. Mansour & Abuelkassem A. A. Mohammad & Sameh Fayyad, 2024. "Understanding the Nexus between Social Commerce, Green Customer Citizenship, Eco-Friendly Behavior and Staying in Green Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Jiseon Ahn & Jookyung Kwon, 2020. "Green hotel brands in Malaysia: perceived value, cost, anticipated emotion, and revisit intention," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(12), pages 1559-1574, June.
    9. Jorge Julião & Marcelo Gaspar & Clarisse Alemão, 2020. "Consumers' perceptions of circular economy in the hotel industry: evidence from Portugal," International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2/3), pages 192-209.
    10. Michele Preziosi & Alessia Acampora & Maria Claudia Lucchetti & Roberto Merli, 2022. "Delighting Hotel Guests with Sustainability: Revamping Importance-Performance Analysis in the Light of the Three-Factor Theory of Customer Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Mahmoud Alreahi & Zoltán Bujdosó & Zoltán Lakner & Laszlo Pataki & Kai Zhu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid & Moaaz Kabil, 2023. "Sustainable Tourism in the Post-COVID-19 Era: Investigating the Effect of Green Practices on Hotels Attributes and Customer Preferences in Budapest, Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Yan Wang & Feng Hao & Yunxia Liu, 2021. "Pro-Environmental Behavior in an Aging World: Evidence from 31 Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    13. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. & Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Bohlen, Greg M., 2003. "Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 465-480, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bartosz Kurek & Ireneusz Górowski, 2025. "Willingness to Pay for Green Energy: Exploring Generation Z Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zhengtao & Hu, Bin, 2018. "Perceived health risk, environmental knowledge, and contingent valuation for improving air quality: New evidence from the Jinchuan mining area in China," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 54-68.
    2. Chad M. Baum & Christian Gross, 2017. "Sustainability policy as if people mattered: developing a framework for environmentally significant behavioral change," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 53-95, April.
    3. Montserrat Boronat-Navarro & José A. Pérez-Aranda, 2020. "Analyzing Willingness to Pay More to Stay in a Sustainable Hotel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Israel-Javier Juma-Michilena & Maria-Eugenia Ruiz-Molina & Irene Gil-Saura & Sergio Belda-Miquel, 2024. "Pro-environmental behaviours of generation Z: A cross-cultural approach," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(3), pages 1-29, September.
    5. Pothitou, Mary & Hanna, Richard F. & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J., 2016. "Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1217-1229.
    6. Johan Jansson, 2011. "Consumer eco‐innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 192-210, March.
    7. Odou, Philippe & Schill, Marie, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 243-253.
    8. Chad M. Baum, 2013. "The Missing Link between Research and Reality: the significance of the relationship between retail format and organic food consumption," Jena Economics Research Papers 2013-049, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    9. Nur Shafeera Mohamad & Ai Chin Thoo & Hon Tat Huam, 2022. "The Determinants of Consumers’ E-Waste Recycling Behavior through the Lens of Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-27, July.
    10. Sreen, Naman & Purbey, Shankar & Sadarangani, Pradip, 2018. "Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 177-189.
    11. Gaëlle BALINEAU, 2017. "Fair Trade? Yes, but not at Christmas! Evidence from scanner data on real French Fairtrade purchases," Working Paper ab9a0fd1-6ad5-441b-879b-3, Agence française de développement.
    12. Niels van Felius & Marit de Vries & Elena Cavagnaro, 2016. "Influencing guest behaviour towards sustainable hotel choice by distribution channels," Tourism and Hospitality Industry 38, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management.
    13. Shanmugavel, Nagarajan & Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, 2023. "Influence of pro-environmental behaviour towards behavioural intention of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Saari, Ulla A. & Damberg, Svenja & Frömbling, Lena & Ringle, Christian M., 2021. "Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. Chiambaretto, Paul & Laurent, Sara & Schmalz, Ulrike & Fu, Mengying & Rouyre, Audrey & Bildstein, Camille & Fernandez, Anne-Sophie, 2024. "Are consumers willing to pay more for green innovations? Insights from the air transport industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Eccarius, Timo & Leung, Abraham & Shen, Chung-Wei & Burke, Matthew & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2021. "Prospects for shared electric velomobility: Profiling potential adopters at a multi-campus university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Steiner, B.E. & Peschel, A.O. & Grebitus, C., 2017. "Multi-Product Category Choices Labeled for Ecological Footprints: Exploring Psychographics and Evolved Psychological Biases for Characterizing Latent Consumer Classes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 251-264.
    18. Shuai Yang & Lei Li & Jiemin Zhang, 2018. "Understanding Consumers’ Sustainable Consumption Intention at China’s Double-11 Online Shopping Festival: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Philippe Odou & Marie Schill, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Post-Print hal-02929920, HAL.
    20. Alvino, Letizia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Other publications TiSEM ed6b6a75-2a9f-4b6e-8076-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5895-:d:1688280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.