IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5854-d1687329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Knowledge to Action: Investigating Sustainability Awareness, Behavior, and Attitude Among Engineering Students at Shaqra University

Author

Listed:
  • Hani S. Alharbi

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia)

  • Basil H. Alotaibi

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sanad S. Alotaibi

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia
    Nokia Al Saudia, King Fahad Street, Tatweer Tower 2, 6th Floor, Al Muhammadiya, Riyadh 11351, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulaziz T. Alqahtani

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia
    Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance, General Administration Building, Airport Road, Riyadh 12629, Saudi Arabia)

  • Haddaj F. Alotaibi

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia)

  • Yousef Alqurashi

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia)

  • Yasser A. Almoshawah

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mahmoud M. Abdel-Daiem

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia
    Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt)

Abstract

Sustainability is vital to engineering education, requiring future engineers to integrate technological advancements with environmental responsibility. This study explores the relationship between sustainability awareness, pro-environmental behavior, and environmental attitudes among engineering students at Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia. The findings indicate that, while students possess moderate sustainability awareness, their engagement in eco-friendly actions remains limited, despite expressing positive environmental attitudes. Civil Engineering students and those in later academic years show higher awareness, emphasizing the role of departmental focus and academic progression. Correlation analysis reveals a strong link between awareness and behavior (r = 0.628 and p < 0.001), yet multiple regression suggests that neither academic year nor department uniquely predicts sustainable actions once awareness is accounted for. Moreover, while pro-environmental attitudes correlate with behavior in bivariate analysis, their impact diminishes in regression, suggesting that positive environmental values do not necessarily translate into consistent green habits. ANOVA results confirm higher awareness among Civil Engineering students, though differences in sustainable behavior are subtle. These findings highlight the need for curricular reforms that integrate sustainability through experiential learning, bridging the gap between awareness and real-world actions. This study supports Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 by promoting environmental awareness and aligning education with labor market needs. It offers tools to help stakeholders and policymakers develop competitive, future-ready generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hani S. Alharbi & Basil H. Alotaibi & Sanad S. Alotaibi & Abdulaziz T. Alqahtani & Haddaj F. Alotaibi & Yousef Alqurashi & Yasser A. Almoshawah & Mahmoud M. Abdel-Daiem, 2025. "From Knowledge to Action: Investigating Sustainability Awareness, Behavior, and Attitude Among Engineering Students at Shaqra University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5854-:d:1687329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5854/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5854/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farjam, Mike & Nikolaychuk, Olexandr & Bravo, Giangiacomo, 2019. "Experimental evidence of an environmental attitude-behavior gap in high-cost situations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Yang, Yongliang & Zhang, Jitao & Song, Changting & Wu, Yingying & Zhang, Bingbing, 2025. "Does environmental information disclosure make financial markets more informative? Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2).
    3. Karel Mulder, 2004. "Engineering education in sustainable development: sustainability as a tool to open up the windows of engineering institutions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 275-285, July.
    4. Salman Khan & Qingyu Zhang & Ikram Ullah Khan & Safeer Ullah Khan & Shafaqat Mehmood, 2025. "Tourists’ pro-environmental behaviour in an autonomous vehicle’s adoption: aligning the integration of value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behaviour," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 604-621, February.
    5. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    6. Mantoura Nakad & Linda Gardelle & Rami J. Abboud, 2025. "Stimulating Engineering Students’ Potential for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, January.
    7. repec:osf:socarx:5wxrs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frauke Meyer & Hawal Shamon & Stefan Vögele, 2022. "Dynamics and Heterogeneity of Environmental Attitude, Willingness and Behavior in Germany from 1993 to 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Joachim P. Hasebrook & Leonie Michalak & Anna Wessels & Sabine Koenig & Stefan Spierling & Stefan Kirmsse, 2022. "Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    3. Lukasz Andrzej Derdowski & Åsa Helen Grahn & Håvard Hansen & Heidi Skeiseid, 2020. "The New Ecological Paradigm, Pro-Environmental Behaviour, and the Moderating Effects of Locus of Control and Self-Construal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Saari, Ulla A. & Damberg, Svenja & Frömbling, Lena & Ringle, Christian M., 2021. "Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Long, Ruyin & Wang, Jiaqi & Chen, Hong & Li, Qianwen & Wu, Meifen & Tan-Soo, Jie-Sheng, 2023. "Applying multilevel structural equation modeling to energy-saving behavior: The interaction of individual- and city-level factors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Yuanhong Liao & Weihong Yang, 2022. "The determinants of different types of private-sphere pro-environmental behaviour: an integrating framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8566-8592, June.
    7. Kyriakos Riskos & Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & Naoum Mylonas & George Tsourvakas, 2021. "Ecolabels and the Attitude–Behavior Relationship towards Green Product Purchase: A Multiple Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Petra Lindemann-Matthies & Julia Werdermann & Martin Remmele, 2023. "‘Simply Make a Change’—Individual Commitment as a Stepping Stone for Sustainable Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Anh Thi Van Tran & Nhung Thi Nguyen, 2021. "Organic Food Consumption among Households in Hanoi: Importance of Situational Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    12. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    13. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    14. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    16. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    17. Mohammed Akhmaaj, Asmaeil Ali & Sharif, Mohamed Omar, 2024. "The effects of planned behavior model constructs and technology acceptance model constructs on online purchasing behavior: An empirical study on internet users in the Libya city of Tripoli," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.
    19. Jacqueline Ruth & Steffen Willwacher & Oliver Korn, 2022. "Acceptance of Digital Sports: A Study Showing the Rising Acceptance of Digital Health Activities Due to the SARS-CoV-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, David & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2012. "The Quantified Traveler: Changing transport behavior with personalized travel data feedback," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3047k0dw, University of California Transportation Center.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5854-:d:1687329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.