IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5797-d1685882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Eco-Innovation Index—A Case Study of Slovakia, Czech Republic, and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Domaracká

    (Department of Earth Resources Management, Institute of Earth Resources, Faculty BERGTechnical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Barbara Kowal

    (Department of Economics and Management in Industry, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Simona Matušková

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Katarina Čulková

    (Department of Earth Resources Management, Institute of Earth Resources, Faculty BERGTechnical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Marcela Taušová

    (Department of Earth Resources Management, Institute of Earth Resources, Faculty BERGTechnical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of eco-innovation across the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland. Eco-innovation, defined as the development and application of new products and processes that contribute to environmental sustainability, is essential for addressing global environmental challenges. The study examines several dimensions of eco-innovation, including eco-innovation outputs, eco-innovation activities, resource efficiency, and socio-economic outcomes. Through a detailed assessment of these dimensions, the research highlights the performance and progress of each country in implementing eco-innovations. The findings reveal significant differences in eco-innovation outputs and activities, with implications for resource efficiency and socio-economic benefits. Ultimately, the article ranks the three countries based on their overall eco-innovation performance, providing insights into their respective strengths and areas for improvement. This comparative analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of eco-innovation dynamics in Central Europe and offers policy recommendations to enhance environmental sustainability in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Domaracká & Barbara Kowal & Simona Matušková & Katarina Čulková & Marcela Taušová, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Eco-Innovation Index—A Case Study of Slovakia, Czech Republic, and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5797-:d:1685882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Doina Popescu & Olguta Anca Orzan, 2020. "Eco-innovation Capability and Sustainability Driven Innovation Practices in Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Geng, Duanyang & Lai, Kee-hung & Zhu, Qinghua, 2021. "Eco-innovation and its role for performance improvement among Chinese small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Álvarez-Herránz, Agustín & Balsalobre, Daniel & Cantos, José María & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2017. "Energy Innovations-GHG Emissions Nexus: Fresh Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 90-100.
    4. Manuel Frondel & Jens Horbach & Klaus Rennings, 2007. "End‐of‐pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(8), pages 571-584, December.
    5. Russell Tatenda Munodawafa & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2019. "Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Eco-Innovation: A Study of Energy Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Bahman Peyravi & Kęstutis Peleckis & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2023. "Eco-Innovation Performance of Lithuania in the Context of European Environmental Policy: Eco-Innovation Indicators and Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Colin C.J. Cheng & Eric C. Shiu, 2020. "Leveraging open innovation strategies for fueling eco-innovation performance in dynamic environments," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(7), pages 1245-1270, June.
    8. Colin C.J. Cheng & Eric C. Shiu, 2020. "Leveraging open innovation strategies for fueling eco-innovation performance in dynamic environments," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(7), pages 1245-1270, June.
    9. Zastempowski, Maciej, 2023. "Analysis and modeling of innovation factors to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources - Evidence from European Union enterprises," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Horbach, Jens, 2008. "Determinants of environmental innovation--New evidence from German panel data sources," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 163-173, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zastempowski, Maciej, 2023. "Analysis and modeling of innovation factors to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources - Evidence from European Union enterprises," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    3. Dongxiao Wu & Xinzhong Bao & Qiulan Su, 2023. "From Green Ideas to Green Savings: Assessing the Financial Impact of Green Innovations on Audit Fees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Myoungjin Oh & Jungwoo Shin & Pil‐Ju Park & Sunmee Kim, 2020. "Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3174-3186, December.
    5. Zhongju Liao & Yuhan Wu, 2025. "Formal institutions, informal institutions, and firms' environmental innovation: An application of the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 668-680, February.
    6. Justin Doran & Geraldine Ryan, 2016. "The Importance of the Diverse Drivers and Types of Environmental Innovation for Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 102-119, February.
    7. repec:ehu:cuader:7982 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Tilmann Rave & Frank Goetzke & Mario Larch, 2011. "The Determinants of Environmental Innovations and Patenting: Germany Reconsidered," ifo Working Paper Series 97, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    9. Ángela Triguero & María C. Cuerva & Francisco J. Sáez‐Martínez, 2022. "Closing the loop through eco‐innovation by European firms: Circular economy for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2337-2350, July.
    10. García-Sánchez, Isabel-María & Aibar-Guzmán, Cristina & Aibar-Guzmán, Beatriz, 2020. "The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Triguero, Angela & Moreno-Mondéjar, Lourdes & Davia, María A., 2013. "Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 25-33.
    12. Sa’ad Sahili & Vanesa Barrales-Molina, 2024. "Analyzing How European Startups Generate Eco-Processes and Eco-Products: Eco-Innovation Implementation, Financial Resources, and Patents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Giulio Cainelli & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Simone Borghesi, 2012. "The European Emission Trading Scheme and environmental innovation diffusion: Empirical analyses using Italian CIS data," Working Papers 201201, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    14. Chassagnon, Virgile & Haned, Naciba, 2015. "The relevance of innovation leadership for environmental benefits: A firm-level empirical analysis on French firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 194-207.
    15. Linda Kusumaning Wedari & Amir Moradi‐Motlagh & Christine Jubb, 2023. "The moderating effect of innovation on the relationship between environmental and financial performance: Evidence from high emitters in Australia," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 654-672, January.
    16. Yang, Chih-Hai & Tseng, Yu-Hsuan & Chen, Chiang-Ping, 2012. "Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 514-532.
    17. Costantini, Valeria & Crespi, Francesco & Palma, Alessandro, 2017. "Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 799-819.
    18. Marzucchi, Alberto & Montresor, Sandro, 2017. "Forms of knowledge and eco-innovation modes: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 208-221.
    19. Pablo del Río & Cristina Peñasco & Desiderio Romero‐Jordán, 2015. "Distinctive Features of Environmental Innovators: An Econometric Analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 361-385, September.
    20. Christian Le Bas & Nicolas Poussing, 2013. "Firm voluntary measures for environmental changes, eco-innovations and CSR : Empirical analysis based on data surveys," Working Papers 1322, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    21. Triguero, A. & Córcoles, D., 2025. "Leveraging eco-innovation and market knowledge for a circular economy transition: Insights from Spanish manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5797-:d:1685882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.