IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p10028-d1522789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing How European Startups Generate Eco-Processes and Eco-Products: Eco-Innovation Implementation, Financial Resources, and Patents

Author

Listed:
  • Sa’ad Sahili

    (Department of Business Organization I, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Vanesa Barrales-Molina

    (Department of Business Organization I, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Despite the pivotal role of European startups in addressing pressing environmental concerns, the current literature has neglected the dynamic factors that influence startups’ decision-making to implement eco-innovation. This study aims to bridge this gap by exploring the impact of eco-innovation implementation on eco-processes and eco-products, considering financial resources and patents as mediators. An integrative framework was proposed, focusing on customer demand, expected benefits, and the description of green innovation as the main dimensions influencing European startups’ decisions to implement green innovation. Furthermore, a questionnaire was distributed to European startups to cover all feasible sectors, resulting in 114 valid responses. The methodology used SmartPLS for descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling. The results showed that financial resources mediate the relationship between eco-innovation implementation and eco-processes, while patents do not mediate either relationship. Eco-innovation implementation also directly influences eco-products. In conclusion, financial resources are essential for advancing eco-process improvements in European startups, emphasizing the necessity for targeted financial support mechanisms to stimulate green innovation. Also, the patents’ absence as a mediator suggests a focus on immediate operational benefits over intellectual property. This paper’s implications can inform strategic decisions for policymakers, investors, and entrepreneurs to promote a more sustainable entrepreneurial landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Sa’ad Sahili & Vanesa Barrales-Molina, 2024. "Analyzing How European Startups Generate Eco-Processes and Eco-Products: Eco-Innovation Implementation, Financial Resources, and Patents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10028-:d:1522789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10028/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10028/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcus Wagner, 2009. "Innovation and competitive advantages from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 291-306, July.
    2. Deepa Guleria & Gurvinder Kaur, 2022. "Motivation for Ecopreneurial Behavior (MEB): Scale Development and Validation," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    3. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    4. Christopher Ball & Markus Kittler, 2019. "Removing environmental market failure through support mechanisms: insights from green start-ups in the British, French and German energy sectors," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 831-844, April.
    5. Colin C.J. Cheng & Eric C. Shiu, 2020. "Leveraging open innovation strategies for fueling eco-innovation performance in dynamic environments," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(7), pages 1245-1270, June.
    6. Riccardo Gianluigi Serio & Maria Michela Dickson & Diego Giuliani & Giuseppe Espa, 2020. "Green production as a factor of survival for innovative startups. Evidence from Italy," Papers 2005.12102, arXiv.org.
    7. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    8. Colin M. Mason & Richard T. Harrison, 2008. "Measuring business angel investment activity in the United Kingdom: a review of potential data sources," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 309-330, July.
    9. Bürgel, Oliver & Fier, Andreas & Licht, Georg & Murray, Gordon, 2000. "Internationalisation of high-tech start-ups and fast growth-evidence for UK and Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 00-35, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Arundel, Anthony & Kabla, Isabelle, 1998. "What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 127-141, June.
    11. Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Anil Kumar & Arvind Upadhyay, 2023. "How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 551-569, January.
    12. Gaddy, Benjamin E. & Sivaram, Varun & Jones, Timothy B. & Wayman, Libby, 2017. "Venture Capital and Cleantech: The wrong model for energy innovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 385-395.
    13. Nuthalapati, Chandra S.R. & Srinivas, K. & Pandey, Neha & Sharma, Rajeev, 2020. "Startups with Open Innovation: Accelerating Technological Change and Food Value Chain Flows in India," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), December.
    14. Sumrin, Samina & Gupta, Suraksha & Asaad, Yousra & Wang, Yichuan & Bhattacharya, Saurabh & Foroudi, Pantea, 2021. "Eco-innovation for environment and waste prevention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 627-639.
    15. Vachon, Stephan & Klassen, Robert D., 2008. "Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 299-315, February.
    16. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    17. Colin C.J. Cheng & Eric C. Shiu, 2020. "Leveraging open innovation strategies for fueling eco-innovation performance in dynamic environments," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(7), pages 1245-1270, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Larbi-Siaw, Otu & Xuhua, Hu & Owusu, Ebenezer & Owusu-Agyeman, Abigail & Fulgence, Brou Ettien & Frimpong, Samuel Akwasi, 2022. "Eco-innovation, sustainable business performance and market turbulence moderation in emerging economies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Rosa Maria Dangelico & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2015. "Being ‘Green and Competitive’: The Impact of Environmental Actions and Collaborations on Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 413-430, September.
    3. Barıs Aksu & Gulsen Akman, 2024. "How Eco-innovation Determinants and Eco-innovation Strategy Influences Sustainability Performance of SMEs? Mediating Role of Eco-innovation Strategy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9368-9392, June.
    4. Peter S. Hofman & Constantin Blome & Martin C. Schleper & Nachiappan Subramanian, 2020. "Supply chain collaboration and eco‐innovations: An institutional perspective from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2734-2754, September.
    5. Yu Zhang & Yajuan Wang, 2022. "Do Managerial Ties Help or Hinder Corporate Green Innovation? The Moderating Roles of Contextual Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Caroline Mothe & Uyen T. Nguyen-Thi & Ángela Triguero, 2018. "Innovative products and services with environmental benefits: design of search strategies for external knowledge and absorptive capacity," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(11), pages 1934-1954, September.
    7. Huynh Evertsen, Phuc & Rasmussen, Einar & Nenadic, Oleg, 2022. "Commercializing circular economy innovations: A taxonomy of academic spin-offs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Dongwook Kim & Sungbum Kim, 2017. "Sustainable Supply Chain Based on News Articles and Sustainability Reports: Text Mining with Leximancer and DICTION," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-44, June.
    9. Yao, Xingyuan, 2025. "The green premium in sustainable fintech: Cross-country evidence from crowdfunding," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Stefano Cosma & Alessandro G. Grasso & Francesco Pagliacci & Alessia Pedrazzoli, 2018. "Is Equity Crowdfunding a Good Tool for Social Enterprises?," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 18022, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    11. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai, 2017. "Manufacturer and retailer coordination for environmental and economic competitiveness: A power perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 268-281.
    12. Francesco Calza & Adele Parmentola & Ilaria Tutore, 2017. "Types of Green Innovations: Ways of Implementation in a Non-Green Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Liubov Syhyda & Liudmyla Saher & Marcin Gąsior & Nataliia Sygyda & Nadiia Artyukhova & Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed & Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi & Robert Rehak, 2023. "Investigating the Role of Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Development in Ukraine and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Perri, Cecilia & Giglio, Carlo & Corvello, Vincenzo, 2020. "Smart users for smart technologies: Investigating the intention to adopt smart energy consumption behaviors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. El-Khalil, Raed & Mezher, Mohamad Ali, 2020. "The mediating impact of sustainability on the relationship between agility and operational performance," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    16. Wenjun Su & Xiaohui Zhao, 2025. "The impact of common institutional ownership on green innovation of China’s energy firms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Giulio Cainelli & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Roberto Zoboli, 2011. "Enviromental Innovations, Complementarity and Local/Global Cooperation," Working Papers 201104, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    18. Wang, Haiyan & Masi, Donato & Dhamotharan, Lalitha & Day, Steven & Kumar, Ajay & Li, Tong & Singh, Gurmeet, 2022. "Unconventional path dependence: How adopting product take-back and recycling systems contributes to future eco-innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 707-717.
    19. DeMaria, Federica & Zezza, Annalisa, . "Drivers and barriers of process innovation in the EU manufacturing food processing industry: exploring the role of energy policies," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(01).
    20. Bikram Jit Singh Mann & Harmeet Kaur, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain Activities and Financial Performance: An Indian Experience," Vision, , vol. 24(1), pages 60-69, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10028-:d:1522789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.