IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5104-d1670333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Analysis of Technological Value in the Intelligent Connected Vehicles Field from the Patent Licensing Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaxin Yuan

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

  • Xianhui Zong

    (School of Intellectual Property, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

  • Guiyang Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

  • Yong Qi

    (School of Intellectual Property, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

Abstract

Patent licensing is essential for sustainable technological diffusion, fostering innovation and strengthening industrial resilience. However, the determinants influencing patent licensing decisions remain underexplored. This study investigates these factors at both the enterprise and patent levels, emphasizing their role in promoting sustainable industrial innovation and knowledge transfer. Given the low proportion of licensed patents, this research proposes a measurement framework to identify thematically similar but unlicensed patents and applies a conditional logistic regression model to analyze the factors affecting licensing decisions. Using patent abstracts from the intelligent connected vehicles (ICVs) sector, topic modeling is conducted to classify technological themes, and Kullback–Leibler divergence is applied to measure differences between licensed and unlicensed patents. The results indicate that technological prestige and depth negatively influence licensing, whereas technological breadth, advancement, and stability have a positive effect. From a sustainability perspective, enterprises should optimize technology management to support responsible knowledge transfer and green innovation. Universities should enhance patent quality and innovation impact to contribute more effectively to sustainable development. Policymakers should refine patent licensing frameworks to foster an efficient, inclusive, and sustainable intellectual property ecosystem, thereby facilitating cross-sectoral technology diffusion, advancing eco-friendly industrial transformation, and promoting sustainable economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaxin Yuan & Xianhui Zong & Guiyang Zhang & Yong Qi, 2025. "Potential Analysis of Technological Value in the Intelligent Connected Vehicles Field from the Patent Licensing Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5104-:d:1670333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Higham, Kyle & de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Jaffe, Adam B., 2021. "Patent Quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    2. SUN, Yu-tao & ZHANG, Chen & WANG, Jin-min, 2022. "How to Benefit from Balancing External Knowledge Acquisition? A Chinese EIT Industry Case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Shen, Huijun & Coreynen, Wim & Huang, Can, 2022. "Exclusive licensing of university technology: The effects of university prestige, technology transfer offices, and academy-industry collaboration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    4. Valentin J. Schmitt, 2025. "Disentangling patent quality: using a large language model for a systematic literature review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(1), pages 267-311, January.
    5. Ming Li & Xiangdong Chen & Gupeng Zhang, 2017. "How does firm size affect technology licensing? Empirical evidence from China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1249-1269, September.
    6. Verhoeven, Dennis & Bakker, Jurriën & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2016. "Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 707-723.
    7. David H. Hsu & Jeffrey M. Kuhn, 2023. "Academic stars and licensing experience in university technology commercialization," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 887-905, March.
    8. Emanuele Bacchiocchi & Fabio Montobbio, 2010. "International Knowledge Diffusion and Home‐bias Effect: Do USPTO and EPO Patent Citations Tell the Same Story?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 112(3), pages 441-470, September.
    9. Shen, Huijun & Coreynen, Wim & Huang, Can, 2023. "Prestige and technology-transaction prices: Evidence from patent-selling by Chinese universities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    10. Stuart J.H. Graham & Alan C. Marco & Richard Miller, 2018. "The USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset: A window on patent processing," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 554-578, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Higham, Kyle & Contisciani, Martina & De Bacco, Caterina, 2022. "Multilayer patent citation networks: A comprehensive analytical framework for studying explicit technological relationships," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Kyle HIGHAM & Sadao NAGAOKA, 2022. "Language Barriers and the Speed of Knowledge Diffusion," Discussion papers 22074, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. Ugo Rizzo & Valerio Sterzi, 2022. "Characterising science-industry patent collaborations: knowledge base, impact and economic value," Working Papers hal-03896633, HAL.
    4. Priore, Riccardo & Compagnoni, Marco & Favot, Marinella, 2025. "Innovation in rare earths recycling: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of patent data," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Pontus Braunerhjelm & Roger Svensson, 2024. "Inventions, commercialization strategies, and knowledge spillovers in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 275-297, June.
    6. Bingyi Wu & Wenhao Zhou, 2025. "Where do breakthroughs originate? Utilizing patent knowledge network to identify breakthrough technological innovations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2551-2576, May.
    7. Wang, Xue & Fan, Li-Wei & Zhang, Hongyan, 2023. "Policies for enhancing patent quality: Evidence from renewable energy technology in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    8. Romagnoli, Matteo, 2024. "Clean sweep: Electricity liberalization and the direction of technological change in the electricity sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(8).
    9. Jiafeng Gu, 2024. "The Impact of Regional Patent Policies on University Technology Transfer: Empirical Evidence from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 18770-18796, December.
    10. P. G. J. Persoon & R. N. A. Bekkers & F. Alkemade, 2020. "How cumulative is technological knowledge?," Papers 2012.00095, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    11. Mueller, Elisabeth & Boeing, Philipp, 2024. "Global influence of inventions and technology sovereignty," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-024, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, revised 2024.
    12. Boeing, Philipp & Brandt, Loren & Dai, Ruochen & Lim, Kevin & Peters, Bettina, 2024. "The anatomy of Chinese innovation: Insights on patent quality and ownership," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-016, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Valentin J. Schmitt, 2025. "Disentangling patent quality: using a large language model for a systematic literature review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(1), pages 267-311, January.
    14. Hain, Daniel S. & Jurowetzki, Roman & Buchmann, Tobias & Wolf, Patrick, 2022. "A text-embedding-based approach to measuring patent-to-patent technological similarity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Capponi, Giovanna & Martinelli, Arianna & Nuvolari, Alessandro, 2022. "Breakthrough innovations and where to find them," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    16. Liangru Yu & Bo Yu, 2024. "How Knowledge Recombination Affect Technology Innovation Quality in Chinese High-Tech Firms: The Role of Relation Dynamics and Knowledge Network Decomposability," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    17. Yin, Libo & Xin, Yu, 2024. "China's cognitive bias premium: An exploration of innovation information," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    18. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    19. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Maria Chiara Guardo & Bo Cowgill, 2017. "Multiplicative-innovation synergies: tests in technological acquisitions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1212-1233, October.
    20. Archibugi, Daniele & Mariella, Vitantonio & Vezzani, Antonio, 2025. "What next? Nations in the technological race through the 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5104-:d:1670333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.