IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4988-d1667245.html

Incentivizing the Transition to Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Case Study on the California Vehicle Rebate Program

Author

Listed:
  • Edmund Zolnik

    (Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, 3351 Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22201, USA)

  • Unchitta Kan

    (School of Computational Science, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA)

Abstract

Alternative Fuel Vehicle (AFV) rebate programs incentivize the transition from fossil fuels to alternative fuels. Unfortunately, research on the people who are rebate program recipients is more evident than research on the places where the programs distribute rebates. To that end, this study retrospectively analyzes rebates in a statewide, AFV rebate program known as the California Vehicle Rebate Program (CVRP), from 2011 to 2022, to explore the statewide distribution of rebates. The specification of novel multilevel models nests rebates within different levels of analysis to control for programmatic income eligibility changes for rebate recipients as well as infrastructural, racial, transactional, environmental, and demographic differences between census tracts. The different levels of analysis include spatial attributes of the CVRP as well as temporal attributes of the CVRP to control for implicit heterogeneity in the outcomes of interest. Results suggest that the CVRP does not distribute rebates to places where infrastructure is accessible, but the CVRP does distribute rebates to places where pollution is burdensome and people are socioeconomically vulnerable.

Suggested Citation

  • Edmund Zolnik & Unchitta Kan, 2025. "Incentivizing the Transition to Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Case Study on the California Vehicle Rebate Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4988-:d:1667245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4988/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4988/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Hardman & Gil Tal, 2021. "Understanding discontinuance among California’s electric vehicle owners," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 538-545, May.
    2. Yang Ju & Lara J. Cushing & Rachel Morello-Frosch, 2020. "An equity analysis of clean vehicle rebate programs in California," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 2087-2105, October.
    3. Edward L. Glaeser & Joshua D. Gottlieb, 2008. "The Economics of Place-Making Policies," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 39(1 (Spring), pages 155-253.
    4. Severin Borenstein & Lucas W. Davis, 2016. "The Distributional Effects of US Clean Energy Tax Credits," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(1), pages 191-234.
    5. Guo, Shuocheng & Kontou, Eleftheria, 2021. "Disparities and equity issues in electric vehicles rebate allocation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Adedamola Adepetu & Srinivasan Keshav, 2017. "The relative importance of price and driving range on electric vehicle adoption: Los Angeles case study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 353-373, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Shuocheng & Kontou, Eleftheria, 2021. "Disparities and equity issues in electric vehicles rebate allocation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Connolly, Rachel & Coffee, Daniel & Pierce, Gregory, 2025. "Do electric vehicle purchase incentives drive equity? The relationship between incentive policies and vehicle registration rates across California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-206.
    3. Lee, Yong-Jin Alex & Nilsson, Isabelle, 2025. "Estimating the effect of a state-level charging infrastructure funding program on plug-in electric vehicle adoption," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Qiao Yu & Tristan Que & Lara J. Cushing & Gregory Pierce & Ke Shen & Mayank Kejriwal & Yuan Yao & Yifang Zhu, 2025. "Equity and reliability of public electric vehicle charging stations in the United States," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Seung Jun Choi & Junfeng Jiao, 2024. "Uncovering electric vehicle ownership disparities using K-means clustering analysis: A case study of Austin, Texas," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 2403-2456, December.
    6. Djoenneady Poetera, Kevin & He, Sylvia Y. & Liu, Meng & Wu, Dan & Rippe, Christoph & Müller, Sven, 2025. "License plate lottery vs charging station density in electric vehicle adoption: Evidence from the early stage of market penetration in Beijing, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 542-565.
    7. Roy, Avipsa & Law, Mankin, 2022. "Examining spatial disparities in electric vehicle charging station placements using machine learning," SocArXiv hvw2t, Center for Open Science.
    8. Ackermann, Ivan & Radulescu, Doina, 2026. "Unveiling the energy price tag - Assessing the burden of household energy expenditures among European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    9. Lucas Woodley & Chung Yi See & Daniel Palmer & Ashley Nunes, 2025. "Equity, Emissions and the Inflation Reduction Act," Papers 2507.15054, arXiv.org.
    10. Shaw, Caroline & Tiatia-Seath, Jemaima, 2022. "Travel inequities experienced by Pacific peoples in Aotearoa/New Zealand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Ivan Ackermann & Doina Radulescu & Doina Maria Radulescu, 2024. "Unveiling the Energy Price Tag – Assessing the Degree of Regressivity of Household Energy Expenditures Among European Countries," CESifo Working Paper Series 11390, CESifo.
    12. Francesco Rouhana & Amvrossios C. Bagtzoglou & Jin Zhu, 2025. "Bridging Vehicle-to-Home Technology and Equity: Enhancing Household Resilience for Disaster Preparedness and Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Gan, Zhongying, 2023. "Do electric vehicle charger locations respond to the potential charging demands from multi-unit dwellings? Evidence from Los Angeles County," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 74-93.
    14. repec:osf:socarx:hvw2t_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Burlig, Fiona PhD & Bushnell, James PhD & Rapson, David PhD & Wolfram, Catherine PhD, 2020. "Supercharged? Electricity Demand and the Electrification of Transportation in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9t62s2sd, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Börjesson, Maria & Asplund, Disa & Hamilton, Carl, 2021. "Optimal kilometre tax for electric passenger cars," Working Papers 2021:3, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    17. Chenran Jia & Can Ding & Wenhui Chen, 2023. "Research on the Diffusion Model of Electric Vehicle Quantity Considering Individual Choice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Jørn Rattsø & Hildegunn E. Stokke, 2011. "Accumulation of education and regional income growth: Limited human capital effects in Norway," Working Paper Series 11211, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    19. Christian Wankmüller & Maximilian Kunovjanek & Robert Gennaro Sposato & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Gibbons, Stephen & Overman, Henry & Sarvimäki, Matti, 2021. "The local economic impacts of regeneration projects: Evidence from UK's single regeneration budget," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    21. Mark D. Partridge & Dan S. Rickman & M. Rose Olfert & Ying Tan, 2015. "When Spatial Equilibrium Fails: Is Place-Based Policy Second Best?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1303-1325, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4988-:d:1667245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.