IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4841-d1663832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain Investment Strategies in Co-Opetitive Supply Chain: Considering Brand Spillover Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Hongkun Lu

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610051, China)

  • Hong Cheng

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610051, China)

Abstract

As environmental issues are of worldwide concern and consumers grow more concerned about the environment, green investments have emerged as a key factor in attracting consumers. To enhance consumer trust in enterprise investments in green and sustainable practices, blockchain technology, with its tamper-resistant and traceable characteristics, is being adopted by an increasing number of enterprises. However, the resulting spillover effect may lead to adverse consequences in a co-opetitive supply chain. This study examines a green supply chain comprising Brand O, a high brand value entity, and a contract manufacturer (CM) with lower brand value. The two parties collaborate through outsourced production while competing in the retail market. Three decision-making models were constructed, namely, without blockchain, Brand O adopting blockchain, and the CM adopting blockchain, and equilibrium solutions were derived to facilitate analysis. We find that Brand O tends not to introduce blockchain in order to avoid the loss of brand value and the spillover of consumer trust. The CM tends to introduce blockchain to enhance its products’ environmental impact and gain an exclusive competitive advantage, targeting the high-end market. These findings guide managers and practitioners in a co-opetitive green supply chain: high brand value retailers should cautiously evaluate blockchain’s impact, staying alert to risks hidden beneath benefits; upstream manufacturers can prioritize blockchain adoption for competitive advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongkun Lu & Hong Cheng, 2025. "Blockchain Investment Strategies in Co-Opetitive Supply Chain: Considering Brand Spillover Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4841-:d:1663832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiayan Xu & Vernon N. Hsu & Baozhuang Niu, 2018. "The Impacts of Markets and Tax on a Multinational Firm's Procurement Strategy in China," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(2), pages 251-264, February.
    2. Pan, Cong, 2019. "Manufacturer’s direct distribution with incumbent retailer’s product line choice," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 136-139.
    3. Xiaohuan Li & Chenggang Wang & Dongrong Li & Dongxue Yang & Fan Meng & Yuan Huang, 2024. "Environmental Regulations, Green Marketing, and Consumers’ Green Product Purchasing Intention: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Deqing Ma & Pengcheng Ma & Jinsong Hu, 2024. "The Impact of Blockchain Technology Adoption on an E-Commerce Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Consumer Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-41, February.
    5. Li, Guo & Li, Lin & Sethi, Suresh P. & Guan, Xu, 2019. "Return strategy and pricing in a dual-channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 153-164.
    6. De Giovanni, Pietro, 2020. "Blockchain and smart contracts in supply chain management: A game theoretic model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong, 2019. "Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 155-166.
    8. Giuseppe Varavallo & Giuseppe Caragnano & Fabrizio Bertone & Luca Vernetti-Prot & Olivier Terzo, 2022. "Traceability Platform Based on Green Blockchain: An Application Case Study in Dairy Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Huihui Liu & Shuguang Sun & Ming Lei & G. Keong Leong & Honghui Deng, 2016. "Research on Cost Information Sharing and Channel Choice in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-12, May.
    10. Luona Song & Yiqing Luo & Zixi Chang & Chunhua Jin & Merveille Nicolas, 2022. "Blockchain Adoption in Agricultural Supply Chain for Better Sustainability: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Senyu & Tang, Huajun & Lin, Zhijun & Lu, Jing, 2022. "Pricing and sales-effort analysis of dual-channel supply chain with channel preference, cross-channel return and free riding behavior based on revenue-sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    3. Ren, Da & Guo, Rui & Lan, Yanfei & Shang, Changjing, 2021. "Shareholding strategies for selling green products on online platforms in a two-echelon supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Tan, Yiheng & Huang, Xiying & Li, Wei, 2023. "Does blockchain-based traceability system guarantee information authenticity? An evolutionary game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    5. Ma, Haicheng & Lou, Gaoxiang & Fan, Tijun & Chan, Hing Kai & Chung, Sai Ho, 2021. "Conventional automotive supply chains under China's dual-credit policy: fuel economy, production and coordination," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Boyu Liu & Xiameng Si & Haiyan Kang, 2022. "A Literature Review of Blockchain-Based Applications in Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida, 2021. "Dynamic decision making in a mixed market under cooperation: Towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Md Maruf Hossan Chowdhury & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Eijaz Ahmed Khan & A. K. M. Shakil Mahmud, 2024. "A Decision Support Model for Barriers and Optimal Strategy Design in Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chain Management," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(3), pages 467-486, September.
    9. Chirantan Mondal & Bibhas C. Giri, 2022. "Analyzing a manufacturer-retailer sustainable supply chain under cap-and-trade policy and revenue sharing contract," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 4057-4092, September.
    10. Li, Mengfan & Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong & Yu, Yugang, 2025. "Green design and information sharing in a horizontally competitive supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    11. Jiarui Fan & Yuning Zhou, 2023. "Empirical Analysis of Financing Efficiency and Constraints Effects on the Green Innovation of Green Supply Chain Enterprises: A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Khouja, Moutaz & Hammami, Ramzi, 2023. "Optimizing price, order quantity, and return policy in the presence of consumer opportunistic behavior for online retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 683-703.
    13. Kumar, Patanjal & Baraiya, Rajendra & Das, Debashree & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar & Xu, Lei & Mangla, Sachin Kumar, 2021. "Social responsibility and cost-learning in dyadic supply chain coordination," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Jun-bin Wang & Lufei Huang, 2021. "A Game-Theoretic Analytical Approach for Fostering Energy-Saving Innovation in the Electric Vehicle Supply Chain," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    15. Yu, Yanan & He, Yong & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    16. Xia, Jing & Zheng, Yan & Yang, Lehe & Xiao, Yujie, 2024. "Government intervention in green technology innovation: The carrot, the stick or both?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    17. Linghong Zhang & Wence Shi, 2025. "The Impacts of the US Inflation Reduction Act on EV Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Ning, Jiajun & Xiong, Lixin, 2024. "Analysis of the dynamic evolution process of the digital transformation of renewable energy enterprises based on the cooperative and evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    19. Yaxin Wang & Haoyu Wen & ZhongQuan Hu & Yuntao Zhang, 2023. "Collaborative Innovation Strategy of Supply Chain in the Context of MCU Domestic Substitution : A Differential Game Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1039-1074, March.
    20. Jinxuan Song & Xu Yan, 2023. "Impact of Government Subsidies, Competition, and Blockchain on Green Supply Chain Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4841-:d:1663832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.