IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8987-d1500688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Regulations, Green Marketing, and Consumers’ Green Product Purchasing Intention: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohuan Li

    (Publicity Department, Harbin University, Harbin 150076, China)

  • Chenggang Wang

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150006, China
    School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150006, China)

  • Dongrong Li

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150006, China)

  • Dongxue Yang

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150006, China)

  • Fan Meng

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150006, China)

  • Yuan Huang

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150006, China)

Abstract

With the strengthening of social environmental regulations, consumers’ green products purchasing intention is also increasing significantly. Simultaneously, green marketing activities have developed into a vital factor affecting consumers’ green products purchasing intention. The first research aim of this paper is to reveal the important relationship between environmental regulation and consumers’ green products purchasing intention. Furthermore, another research aim is to reveal the role of green marketing in environmental regulation and consumers’ green products purchasing intention. To achieve the above purpose, we primarily employ regression analysis, threshold effect analysis, spatial spillover effect analysis, and heterogeneity tests. We come up with some conclusions. First of all, environmental regulations could enhance consumers’ green product purchasing intention. With the reinforcement of environmental regulations, consumers’ green product purchasing intention could be effectively elevated. Secondly, green marketing is a positive mediator of the environmental regulations that affect the consumers’ green product purchasing intention. By enhancing their green marketing capabilities, businesses could also strengthen consumers’ green product purchasing intention. Lastly, in different regions of China, the impact of environmental regulations and green marketing on consumers’ green product purchasing intention varies. In the Eastern region, the influence of environmental regulations on consumers’ green product purchasing intention is most prominent. However, green marketing exerts the greatest impact on the consumers’ green product purchasing intention in the Western region. In addition, this paper provides significant insights for the managers in making management decisions. This is beneficial for enhancing consumers’ green product purchasing intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohuan Li & Chenggang Wang & Dongrong Li & Dongxue Yang & Fan Meng & Yuan Huang, 2024. "Environmental Regulations, Green Marketing, and Consumers’ Green Product Purchasing Intention: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8987-:d:1500688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8987/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8987/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah Al Mamun & Noorshella Che Nawi & Naeem Hayat & Noor Raihani Binti Zainol, 2020. "Predicting the Purchase Intention and Behaviour towards Green Skincare Products among Malaysian Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Li, Guangpei & Wang, Xiaoyu & Su, Shibin & Su, Yuan, 2019. "How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Hong Wang & Baolong Ma & Rubing Bai, 2019. "How Does Green Product Knowledge Effectively Promote Green Purchase Intention?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Hirose, Kosuke & Matsumura, Toshihiro, 2023. "Green transformation in oligopoly markets under common ownership," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Bei Xiong & Ruimei Wang, 2020. "Effect of Environmental Regulation on Industrial Solid Waste Pollution in China: From the Perspective of Formal Environmental Regulation and Informal Environmental Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Lior Rennert & Sharon X. Xie, 2022. "Cox regression model under dependent truncation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 460-473, June.
    7. James Agyei & Shaorong Sun & Emmanuel Kofi Penney & Eugene Abrokwah & Richmond Ofori-Boafo, 2021. "Linking CSR and Customer Engagement: The Role of Customer-Brand Identification and Customer Satisfaction," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    8. Tiago Trancoso & Sofia Gomes, 2024. "Green Shocks: The Spillover Effects of Green Equity Indices on Global Market Dynamics," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Hasan, Mohammad Maruf & Du, Fang, 2023. "Nexus between green financial development, green technological innovation and environmental regulation in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 218-228.
    10. Wander Jager & Marco A. Janssen, 2002. "Stimulating diffusion of green products," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 283-306.
    11. Poudou, Jean-Christophe & Sand-Zantman, Wilfried, 2023. "The environmental impact of Internet regulation," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Choi, Pak-Sing & Espinola-Arredondo, Ana & Munoz-Garcia, Felix, 2024. "Environmental regulation under sequential competition," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 52-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi Feng & Yu Feng & Ziyang Liu, 2025. "The Impact Mechanism of Government Environmental Regulation and Green Consumer Orientation (GCO) on Green Purchase Intention: A Case Study of Zespri," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Khanh Huy Nguyen & Mai Dong Tran, 2025. "How Minimalism Drives Green Purchase Intention in Collectivist Cultures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Hongkun Lu & Hong Cheng, 2025. "Blockchain Investment Strategies in Co-Opetitive Supply Chain: Considering Brand Spillover Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie, Yu & Rasool, Zeeshan & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Mattayaphutron, Suchira & Murad, Muhammad, 2024. "Sustainable Central Asia: Impact of fintech, natural resources, renewable energy, and financial inclusion to combat environmental degradation and achieving sustainable development goals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Xingwei Li & Jingru Li & Yicheng Huang & Jinrong He & Xiang Liu & Jiachi Dai & Qiong Shen, 2022. "Construction enterprises’ adoption of green development behaviors: an agent-based modeling approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Jun Liu & Yu Qian & Huihong Chang & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2022. "The Impact of Technology Innovation on Enterprise Capacity Utilization—Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Alharbi, Samar S. & Tabash, Mosab I. & Farooq, Umar & Issa, Suzan Sameer, 2025. "How does climate policy uncertainty determine green innovation adoption? New perspectives from the BRICS," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    5. Sheng Liu & Xin Gu & Xiuying Chen, 2024. "The ecological accountability reform and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from a policy shock," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(8), pages 4176-4194, December.
    6. YuBiao Hao & XueCheng Zhang, 2023. "The impact of environmental regulation on urban green output efficiency: evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5717-5735, June.
    7. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Mandravickaitė, Justina & Bernatonienė, Jurga, 2016. "Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 38-46.
    8. Dixon, Darcie & Mikolon, Sven, 2021. "Cents of self: How and when self-signals influence consumer value derived from choices of green products," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 365-386.
    9. Muntazir Hussain & Ramiz Ur Rehman & Usman Bashir, 2024. "Environmental pollution, innovation, and financial development: an empirical investigation in selected industrialized countries using the panel ARDL approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29217-29248, November.
    10. Yawei Xue & Chunqian Zhu & Yuchen Lu, 2025. "Research on the Influence Mechanism of New Energy Vehicle Promotion Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Liping Wang & Zhijia Wang & Lili Tian & Chuang Li, 2022. "Evolutionary Game and Numerical Simulation of Enterprises’ Green Technology Innovation: Based on the Credit Sales Financing Service of Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Zihao Zhen & Jiabei Chen & Ya Zhang & Jie Qin, 2025. "Navigating Urban Transformation: The Impact of Green Innovation on Sustainable Development Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Johan Jansson, 2011. "Consumer eco‐innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 192-210, March.
    14. Chen Wang & Yeonggil Kim & Changhee Kim, 2022. "Are all CSR Activities in Your SNS Authentic? The Antecedents and Outcomes of Consumer Perceived Authenticity of CSR," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    15. Ying Sun & Kexin Zhang & Xuyang Li, 2024. "The Impact of Environmental Protection Investment and Equity Balance Degree on Economic Performance and Eco-Autonomy: An Empirical Study of China’s A-Share Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Fatima Batool & Ibrahim A. Alhidary & Jhansi Rani Boda & Belal Mahmoud Alwadi & Khurshid Khudoykulov & Mohammad Haseeb, 2025. "Balancing Sustainability and Profitability: The Financial Effect of Green Innovation in Chinese High-Pollution Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-29, April.
    17. Cantono, Simona, 2012. "Unveiling diffusion dynamics: an autocatalytic percolation model of environmental innovation diffusion and the optimal dynamic path of adoption subsidies," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201222, University of Turin.
    18. Bin Fan & Mingyang Li, 2022. "The Effect of Heterogeneous Environmental Regulations on Carbon Emission Efficiency of the Grain Production Industry: Evidence from China’s Inter-Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    19. Lu Tang & Lei Tong, 2025. "A Study on the Impact of the Digital Economy on the Industrial Collaborative Agglomeration of Manufacturing and Productive Service Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Hongjun Cao & Yuxin Fang & Jihui Sun, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Institutional Support on the Servitization Transformation Performance of Manufacturing Firms—Based on a Dual Mediation Model of Business Model Innovation and Technological Inn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8987-:d:1500688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.