IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4672-d1659491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Healthcare Plastic Products: Application of the Transition Engineering Design Approach Yields a Novel Concept for Circularity and Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Ahrens

    (School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
    Global Association for Transition Engineering, Chelmsford CM1 1HT, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lisa-Marie Nettlenbusch

    (Global Association for Transition Engineering, Chelmsford CM1 1HT, UK
    Institute for Design Engineering & Drive Technology, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Susan Krumdieck

    (School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
    Global Association for Transition Engineering, Chelmsford CM1 1HT, UK)

  • Alexander Hasse

    (Institute for Design Engineering & Drive Technology, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany)

Abstract

Durable plastics are a sustainability challenge for healthcare products. Orthopedic products are regulated with strict specifications for human tissue interactions. Healthcare engineers and managers select plastic to meet the full range of material properties. Plastic is plentiful, low cost, and reliable, with established supply chains. Used plastic products can be discarded using existing waste management systems with low externality costs for orthopedic businesses. However, plastic is produced from fossil petroleum, raising issues for sustainability commitments of healthcare product companies. Barriers to the transition away from single-use plastic toward circular systems and bio-based healthcare products have been studied, but the transition is a goal that has yet to be realized. This research article reports on a transition engineering design sprint with a medium-sized orthopedic company specializing in orthoses for children and teenagers. The design sprint process engages company experts with systems perspectives on the role of unsustainable plastic in orthopedic healthcare and illuminates opportunities for capturing value in business transition. Two system transition project concepts were co-developed. The first concept is a plastics value map that aims to converge the satisfaction of essential needs with the usefulness of plastics under the limitations of a biophysically constrained future economy. The second concept is an orthopedics library data system concept that would allow reusing of fit-for-purpose used products and to inform the refurbishment of used products. In addition to an explanation of the design of the two concepts, the article presents reflections of co-design stakeholders on the usefulness and usability of the concepts. The article provides a real-world application of the co-design processes in transition engineering and the reflection by the company on the value of the results. The results indicate that the co-designed concepts could enable the company to address its sustainability aspirations and potentially resolve the dissonance of sustainability and business viability.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Ahrens & Lisa-Marie Nettlenbusch & Susan Krumdieck & Alexander Hasse, 2025. "Sustainable Healthcare Plastic Products: Application of the Transition Engineering Design Approach Yields a Novel Concept for Circularity and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4672-:d:1659491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Fischer, 2014. "Fit for the Future? A New Approach in the Debate about What Makes Healthcare Systems Really Sustainable," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Flaviu Moldovan & Liviu Moldovan, 2024. "Sustainable Waste Management in Orthopedic Healthcare Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Stefan Bringezu, 2015. "Possible Target Corridor for Sustainable Use of Global Material Resources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Carolynn L. Smith & Christina Rojas & Yvonne Zurynski & Andrew Partington & Jeffrey Braithwaite, 2025. "From policy to practice: building a resilient, climate aware health system from the ground up," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Yadav, Dinesh & Garg, Ramesh Kumar & Ahlawat, Akash & Chhabra, Deepak, 2020. "3D printable biomaterials for orthopedic implants: Solution for sustainable and circular economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Léa Weimann & Edda Weimann, 2022. "On the Road to Net Zero Health Care Systems: Governance for Sustainable Health Care in the United Kingdom and Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Abrar Mahjoob & Yousef Alfadhli & Vincent Omachonu, 2023. "Healthcare Waste and Sustainability: Implications for a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alla Mostepaniuk & Turgay Akalin & Mohammad Reza Parish, 2023. "Practices Pursuing the Sustainability of A Healthcare Organization: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Maria Antoniadou, 2024. "Integrating Lean Management and Circular Economy for Sustainable Dentistry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Marc Audi & Marc Poulin & Amjad Ali, 2024. "Nexus between Innovation and Ecological Impact: A Moderated Mediation Investigation through Structural Equation Modeling Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 509-518, July.
    4. Martina Pisarra & Marta Marsilio & Letizia Magnani & Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti, 2024. "Sostenibilit? in sanit?: una valutazione degli impatti della telemedicina," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(130), pages 109-136.
    5. Chris McElroy & Daniel W. O'Neill, 2024. "The labour and resource use requirements of a good life for all," Papers 2411.06337, arXiv.org.
    6. Kazim Topuz & Timothy L. Urban & Robert A. Russell & Mehmet B. Yildirim, 2024. "Decision support system for appointment scheduling and overbooking under patient no-show behavior," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 845-873, November.
    7. Zhang, Yajuan & Wang, Zheng & Li, Shuangcheng, 2024. "Can a new power system help maintain planetary boundaries within a safe operating space?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    8. Federica Bosco & Chiara Di Gerio & Gloria Fiorani, 2023. "La sfida della sostenibilit? nelle organizzazioni pubbliche ad alta intensit? di conoscenza. Un modello per integrare le logiche ESG all?interno delle corporate strategies delle organizzazioni sanitar," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(128), pages 47-75.
    9. William E. Rees, 2023. "The human eco-predicament: Overshoot and the population conundrum," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 21(1), pages 21-39.
    10. Christin Seifert, 2018. "The Barriers for Voluntary Environmental Management Systems—The Case of EMAS in Hospitals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Carlotta D’Alessandro & Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska & Małgorzata Tarczyńska-Łuniewska & Cecilia Silvestri & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2024. "Exploring Circular Economy Practices in the Healthcare Sector: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Luthra, Sunil & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Sarkis, Joseph & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2022. "Resources melioration and the circular economy: Sustainability potentials for mineral, mining and extraction sector in emerging economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. van Schie, Vera, 2024. "Governance related factors influencing the implementation of sustainability in hospitals: A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Hettiarachchi, Biman Darshana & Brandenburg, Marcus & Seuring, Stefan, 2022. "Connecting additive manufacturing to circular economy implementation strategies: Links, contingencies and causal loops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    15. Anastasios Sepetis & Konstantinos Georgantas & Ioannis Nikolaou, 2024. "A Proposed Circular Economy Model for Hospital Bio-Waste Management in Municipal Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Vladimir Bulatnikov & Cristinel Petrișor Constantin, 2023. "Assessing Customer Satisfaction to Support Future Improvement Strategies of Healthcare Systems: Evidences from Russia and Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Gang Du & Chuanwang Sun, 2015. "Location Planning Problem of Service Centers for Sustainable Home Healthcare: Evidence from the Empirical Analysis of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Nada Bendahmane & Natacha Gondran & Jacques Chevalier, 2024. "Are Existing LCIA Methods Related to Mineral and Metal Resources Relevant for an AESA Approach Applied to the Building Sector? Case Study on the Construction of New Buildings in France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4672-:d:1659491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.