IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4517-d1656674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing Growth and Emission Reduction: Evaluating Carbon Tax’s Impact on Sustainable Development in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ruilin Li

    (School of Political Science and Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea)

  • Xiaoqian Song

    (School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
    China Institute of Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Aiwen Zhao

    (College of Finance, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221018, China)

  • Xi Zhang

    (School of Business, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Jiajie Li

    (Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines, School of Resource and Safety Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ziao Yu

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Hong Sun

    (Zao Zhuang Mining Group Co., Ltd., Zaozhuang 277000, China)

Abstract

The carbon tax is a crucial economic instrument for China; it aims to encourage the reduction of carbon emissions and provide additional revenue for the government in order to promote the transformation of society towards low-carbon and sustainable development. The suboptimal carbon tax refers to the carbon tax rate that achieves the best balance between emission reduction targets and economic benefits. Using China’s 2020 Non-competitive Input–Output Table, which encompasses 42 sectors, alongside carbon emission data sourced from the China Carbon Emission Accounts and Datasets (CEADs) covering 47 sectors, this study established a Carbon Tax-adjusted Input–Output Table of China’s Non-competitive Carbon Emissions 2020 (26 sectors) and constructed a multi-objective suboptimal carbon tax model based on an input–output price change model. Based on these, the suboptimal carbon tax rates under four different sets of constraints were simulated, including 49.2 CNY/ton (low inflation), 98.3 CNY/ton (low-to-medium inflation), 147.1 CNY/ton (medium-to-high inflation), and 195.5 CNY/ton (high inflation). We found that the suboptimal carbon tax should take into account its impact on prices, carbon reduction, and GDP, and higher carbon tax rates lead to more significant macroeconomic impacts and increased efforts in reducing emissions. Policy recommendations have also been put forward, such as launching a comprehensive research framework, establishing a synergistic and complementary mechanism between carbon taxation and carbon trading, designing a dynamic carbon tax, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruilin Li & Xiaoqian Song & Aiwen Zhao & Xi Zhang & Jiajie Li & Ziao Yu & Hong Sun, 2025. "Balancing Growth and Emission Reduction: Evaluating Carbon Tax’s Impact on Sustainable Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4517-:d:1656674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Ploeg, Frederick & Rezai, Armon, 2017. "Cumulative emissions, unburnable fossil fuel, and the optimal carbon tax," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 216-222.
    2. J. A. Mirrlees, 1971. "An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 38(2), pages 175-208.
    3. Distefano, Tiziano & D’Alessandro, Simone, 2023. "Introduction of the carbon tax in Italy: Is there room for a quadruple-dividend effect?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Aiwen Zhao & Xiaoqian Song & Jiajie Li & Qingchun Yuan & Yingshun Pei & Ruilin Li & Michael Hitch, 2023. "Effects of Carbon Tax on Urban Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence in China Environmental Governance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Fouquet, Roger & O'Garra, Tanya, 2022. "In pursuit of progressive and effective climate policies: Comparing an air travel carbon tax and a frequent flyer levy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Liu, Na & Yao, Xilong & Wan, Fang & Han, Yunfei, 2023. "Are tax revenue recycling schemes based on industry-differentiated carbon tax conducive to realizing the “double dividend”?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Dissou, Yazid & Siddiqui, Muhammad Shahid, 2014. "Can carbon taxes be progressive?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 88-100.
    8. de Bruin, Kelly & Yakut, Aykut Mert, 2024. "Efficiency–equity trade-off in the Irish carbon tax: A CGE investigation of mixed revenue recycling schemes," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Qi & Liu, Kui, 2024. "Hero or Devil: A comparison of different carbon tax policies for China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    2. David Klenert & Gregor Schwerhoff & Ottmar Edenhofer & Linus Mattauch, 2018. "Environmental Taxation, Inequality and Engel’s Law: The Double Dividend of Redistribution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(3), pages 605-624, November.
    3. Blumkin, Tomer & Sadka, Efraim & Shem-Tov, Yotam, 2011. "Labor Migration and the Case for Flat Tax," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275759, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Roozbeh Hosseini & Larry E. Jones & Ali Shourideh, 2009. "Risk Sharing, Inequality and Fertility," NBER Working Papers 15111, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Karin Mayr, 2003. "Immigration and Majority Voting on Income Redistriubtion-Is there a Case for Opposition from Natives?," Economics working papers 2003-08, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    6. Andreas Pollak, 2008. "Optimal Unemployment Insurance with Variable Skill Levels," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 164(4), pages 696-726, December.
    7. Kenneth Judd & Scott E. Page, 2004. "Computational Public Economics," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 6(2), pages 195-202, May.
    8. Andrea Attar & Thomas Mariotti & François Salanié, 2020. "The Social Costs of Side Trading," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(630), pages 1608-1622.
    9. Stefanie Stantcheva, 2020. "Dynamic Taxation," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 801-831, August.
    10. Antinolfi, Gaetano & Azariadis, Costas & Bullard, James, 2016. "The Optimal Inflation Target In An Economy With Limited Enforcement," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 582-600, March.
    11. Bas Jacobs, 2013. "Optimal redistributive tax and education policies in general equilibrium," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(2), pages 312-337, April.
    12. Frode Brevik & Manfred Gärtner, 2006. "Macroeconomic effects of banking secrecy when tax evasion is endogenous," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2006 2006-10, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
    13. Börjesson, Maria & Asplund, Disa & Hamilton, Carl, 2021. "Optimal kilometre tax for electric passenger cars," Working Papers 2021:3, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    14. Ed Westerhout & Kees Folmer, 2007. "Co-payment systems in health care; between moral hazard and risk reduction," CPB Discussion Paper 78.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    15. Blomquist, Soren & Micheletto, Luca, 2006. "Optimal redistributive taxation when government's and agents' preferences differ," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(6-7), pages 1215-1233, August.
    16. Fredrik Carlsson & Dinky Daruvala & Olof Johansson‐Stenman, 2005. "Are People Inequality‐Averse, or Just Risk‐Averse?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 72(287), pages 375-396, August.
    17. Jacquet, Laurence & Lehmann, Etienne, 2021. "How to Tax Different Incomes?," IZA Discussion Papers 14739, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Pierre Cahuc & Stéphane Carcillo, 2014. "The Detaxation of Overtime Hours: Lessons from the French Experiment," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(2), pages 361-400.
    19. Boadway, Robin & Marceau, Nicolas & Sato, Motohiro, 1997. "An Agency Model of Welfare and Disability Assistance," Queen's Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers 273383, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    20. Casey Rothschild & Florian Scheuer, 2014. "A Theory of Income Taxation under Multidimensional Skill Heterogeneity," NBER Working Papers 19822, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4517-:d:1656674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.