IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3160-d1373087.html

Innovating the Local Plan through Co-Creation and the Public Sociology Approach toward Urban Regeneration: An Italian Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Polci

    (School of Architecture and Design, University of Camerino, 63100 Ascoli Piceno, Italy)

  • Ilenia Pierantoni

    (School of Architecture and Design, University of Camerino, 63100 Ascoli Piceno, Italy)

Abstract

This paper examines the role of social research and communication methodologies in fostering substantive democratic participation and policy co-production within the context of urban regeneration initiatives anchored in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This research critically analyzes the “becoming public” of sociology and social research in participatory design processes related to traditional urban planning instruments at the local scale (Regulatory Plans) in the Italian context, specifically through the case study of the Municipality of Appignano. It questions the role of sociology in activating a competent public sphere and promoting deliberative democracy at urban and territorial design levels and whether we can identify the traits of public sociology in facilitating the different stages of these processes. This paper details a participatory process in Appignano that sought to innovate urban regeneration within complex legislative frameworks, emphasizing community engagement and interdisciplinary approaches. The findings reveal a community actively participating in the regeneration process, demonstrating a high level of agreement on various urban development strategies aimed at sustainability. This study underscores the capacity of public sociology to facilitate public debate and democratic dialogue and suggests that such participatory approaches can significantly contribute to sustainable and resilient urban development, highlighting the potential of sociology as a moral and political force in urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Polci & Ilenia Pierantoni, 2024. "Innovating the Local Plan through Co-Creation and the Public Sociology Approach toward Urban Regeneration: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3160-:d:1373087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3160/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3160/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russell J. Dalton, 2008. "Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 76-98, March.
    2. Russell J. Dalton, 2008. "Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 76-98, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Oser & Marc Hooghe & Zsuzsa Bakk & Roberto Mari, 2023. "Changing citizenship norms among adolescents, 1999-2009-2016: A two-step latent class approach with measurement equivalence testing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4915-4933, October.
    2. An, Youngeun & Lee, Youngsun & Oh, Soon-young & Lee, Jeong Youn, 2024. "How can young adults be civically engaged? The role of academic achievement standards in enhancing civic and social engagement in the case of South Korea," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Gugushvili, Alexi, 2024. "Perceptions of the Consequences of War in Ukraine: Exploring a Russian Paradox," SocArXiv y8rzh, Center for Open Science.
    4. Piatak Jaclyn, 2023. "Do Sociocultural Factors Drive Civic Engagement? An Examination of Political Interest and Religious Attendance," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 185-204, April.
    5. Sofie Marien & Marc Hooghe & Ellen Quintelier, 2010. "Inequalities in Non‐institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi‐level Analysis of 25 countries," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(1), pages 187-213, February.
    6. Li, Xuan, 2020. "The critical assessment of the youth policy and youth civic engagement in Denmark and three Danish municipalities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Mark Visser & Maurice Gesthuizen & Gerbert Kraaykamp, 2019. "Work Values and Political Participation: A Cross-National Analysis," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 682(1), pages 186-203, March.
    8. Cato Waeterloos & Peter Conradie & Michel Walrave & Koen Ponnet, 2021. "Digital Issue Movements: Political Repertoires and Drivers of Participation among Belgian Youth in the Context of ‘School Strike for Climate’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Igor Vidačak & Mario Munta & Ana Matan, 2025. "Too Far to Reach? Explaining Low Croatian Participation in the European Citizens' Initiative," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    10. Kathrin Ackermann & Jonathan Mylius & Annette Haussmann & Stefanie Wiloth, 2025. "Living Up to Your Own Standards? Patterns of Civic Norms and Volunteering in Germany," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    11. Max Boholm & Elina Lindgren & Ellen Breitholtz & Robin Cooper & Gregor Rettenegger & Björn Rönnerstrand & Asad Sayeed, 2026. "Tracking dogwhistles online and through time using distributional semantics," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 1-33, May.
    12. Ramos Javier & Padilla Javier & Chueca Enrique, 2019. "Abstentionism, Voting Advice Applications and Voting Activation," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 55-85, June.
    13. Quinton Mayne & Brigitte Geißel, 2018. "Don’t Good Democracies Need “Good” Citizens? Citizen Dispositions and the Study of Democratic Quality," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 33-47.
    14. Yingying Sun & Yue Zhang, 2019. "Who Is Happier in China? Exploring Determinant Factors Using Religion as a Moderator," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2022. "Does Political Participation Strengthen the Relationship between Civic Morality and Environmentally Friendly Attitudes? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    16. Carolyn Barber & Jessica Ross, 2018. "Cross-Cohort Changes in Adolescents’ Civic Attitudes from 1999 to 2009: An Analysis of Sixteen Countries," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(2), pages 681-703, April.
    17. Michele Micheletti & Dietlind Stolle, 2012. "Sustainable Citizenship and the New Politics of Consumption," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 644(1), pages 88-120, November.
    18. Şehide Kilinc, 2025. "Research Trends on Political Participation of School Aged Children and Adolescents: Bibliometric Mapping and Content Analysis," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(2), pages 753-787, April.
    19. Yeshwork Gizaw Zewdie & Demis Alamirew Getahun & Yitayal Alemu Mengistu & Sefinew Alemu Mekonnen & Missaye Mulatie Mengstie, 2024. "Explaining motivational factors of employees’ behavior towards customers’ satisfaction using the theory of planned behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Livia Elisa Ortensi & Veronica Riniolo, 2020. "Do Migrants Get Involved in Politics? Levels, Forms and Drivers of Migrant Political Participation in Italy," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 133-153, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3160-:d:1373087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.