IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1285-d1332342.html

The Impact of Japan’s Discharge of Nuclear-Contaminated Water on Aquaculture Production, Trade, and Food Security in China and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Liang

    (School of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Shilong Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Zhichao Lou

    (School of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Abdelrahman Ali

    (School of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt)

Abstract

The aquaculture and fisheries sectors play critical roles in promoting a global nutritious and climate-friendly food system. The Japanese government started implementing the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water (NCW) into the Pacific Ocean in August 2023, which was followed by stopping the import of seafood from Japan to ensure the safety of imported food for Chinese citizens. The discharge of NCW into the ocean by Japan will directly harm the marine ecological environment and the global ecosystem due to the importance of China as the largest producer, processor, and exporter of aquatic products (APs). This paper employs the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model to simulate the future impacts of discharging the NCW under three different scenarios. The results showed that discharging NCW will lead to a global decline in AP production and also has negative repercussions on the macroeconomic landscape. Japan will face the most significant negative impact on its national macroeconomy, e.g., Japan’s GDP, total imports, total exports, household income, and social welfare will decrease by 2.18%, 3.84%, 8.30%, 2.61%, and $130.07 billion; similarly, for China, the decrease will be 0.03%, 1.21%, 0.08%, and $728.15 billion, respectively. If China’s AP consumption decreases by 10% and 20%, it will result in protein deficits of 1.536 million tons and 3.132 million tons, respectively. Japan’s deficit will reach 138,000 tons and 276,000 tons. This necessitates supplementation via the consumption of other protein-rich foods, posing a significant threat to the nutritional security of food in both China and Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Liang & Shilong Yang & Zhichao Lou & Abdelrahman Ali, 2024. "The Impact of Japan’s Discharge of Nuclear-Contaminated Water on Aquaculture Production, Trade, and Food Security in China and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1285-:d:1332342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Negar Akbari & Pierre Failler & Haoran Pan & Benjamin Drakeford & Andy Forse, 2023. "The Impact of Fisheries on the Economy: A Systematic Review on the Application of General Equilibrium and Input–Output Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Christopher Costello & Ling Cao & Stefan Gelcich & Miguel Á. Cisneros-Mata & Christopher M. Free & Halley E. Froehlich & Christopher D. Golden & Gakushi Ishimura & Jason Maier & Ilan Macadam-Somer & T, 2020. "The future of food from the sea," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7836), pages 95-100, December.
    3. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2021. "Agri-food impacts of Fukushima nuclear accident - lessons learned 10 years after disaster," MPRA Paper 108041, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Uchida, Hirotsugu & Onozaka, Yuko & Morita, Tamaki & Managi, Shunsuke, 2014. "Demand for ecolabeled seafood in the Japanese market: A conjoint analysis of the impact of information and interaction with other labels," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 68-76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linhua Xia & Zhuiwen Lai & Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli, 2025. "The Business Innovation of Consumer Choices and Challenges for Economic Sustainability Practices and Law," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodrigues De Freitas, Rodrigo & Simão Seixas, Cristiana & Regina Da Cal Seixas, Sônia, 2020. "Understanding the past to plan for the future: The small-scale fisheries at Ilha Grande Bay, Brazil," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    2. Jingyi Liu & Feng Gui & Qian Zhou & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2023. "Carbon Footprint of a Large Yellow Croaker Mariculture Models Based on Life-Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Danilo Bertoni & Daniele Cavicchioli & Franco Donzelli & Giovanni Ferrazzi & Dario G. Frisio & Roberto Pretolani & Elena Claire Ricci & Vera Ventura, 2018. "Recent Contributions of Agricultural Economics Research in the Field of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Piotr Eljasik & Remigiusz Panicz & Małgorzata Sobczak & Jacek Sadowski, 2022. "Key Performance Indicators of Common Carp ( Cyprinus carpio L.) Wintering in a Pond and RAS under Different Feeding Schemes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Makiko Nakano, 2019. "Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility by Consumers: Use of Organic Material and Long Working Hours of Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Kyrre Rickertsen & Frode Alfnes & Pierre Combris & Géraldine Enderli & Sylvie Issanchou & Jason F. Shogren, 2017. "French Consumers' Attitudes and Preferences toward Wild and Farmed Fish," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(1), pages 59-81.
    7. Fabio Boncinelli & Francesca Gerini & Benedetta Neri & Leonardo Casini, 2018. "Consumer willingness to pay for non‐mandatory indication of the fish catch zone," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 728-741, October.
    8. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers’ attitudes on carbon footprint labelling. Results of the SUSDIET project," Thünen Working Paper 266396, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    9. Hiroki Wakamatsu & Yuki Maruyama, 2024. "Consumer Preference for Fisheries Improvement Project: Case of Bigeye Tuna in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-11, March.
    10. Asche, Frank & Larsen, Thomas A. & Smith, Martin D. & Sogn-Grundvåg, Geir & Young, James A., 2015. "Pricing of eco-labels with retailer heterogeneity," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 82-93.
    11. Sara Apresentação & Mafalda Rangel & Assunção Cristas, 2024. "Towards Sustainability: A Framework for Evaluating Portuguese Small-Scale Fisheries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Zhu, Zhanguo & Zhang, Tong & Hu, Wuyang, 2023. "The accumulation and substitution effects of multi-nation certified organic and protected eco-origin food labels in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Thøgersen, John, 2023. "How does origin labelling on food packaging influence consumer product evaluation and choices? A systematic literature review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Claude E. Boyd & Aaron A. McNevin & Robert P. Davis, 2022. "The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 805-827, June.
    15. Tom Pickerell & Oliver S. Ashford, 2025. "Ocean-Based Solutions Can Help Close the Climate Emissions Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-10, September.
    16. Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Pálsdóttir, Rakel Gyða & Folwarczny, Michal & Menon, R.G. Vishnu & Fagerstrøm, Asle, 2022. "Increasing the effectiveness of ecological food signaling: Comparing sustainability tags with eco-labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1099-1110.
    17. Ingrid Kelling & Marylyn Carrigan & Andrew F. Johnson, 2023. "Transforming the seafood supply system: challenges and strategies for resilience," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(6), pages 1585-1591, December.
    18. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2025. "Evolution and efficiency of the agricultural utilization wastewaters management chain in Bulgaria," MPRA Paper 127457, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Fagerstrøm, Asle & Eriksson, Niklas & Sigurdsson, Valdimar, 2020. "Investigating the impact of Internet of Things services from a smartphone app on grocery shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Natali, F. & Cacchiarelli, L. & Branca, G., 2022. "There are plenty more (sustainable) fish in the sea: A discrete choice experiment on discarded species in Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1285-:d:1332342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.