IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1219-d1330868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Green Agricultural Production Decision-Making by Agricultural Cooperatives under Government Subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Yinglong Xin

    (School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

  • Yaoqun Xu

    (Institute of System Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

  • Yi Zheng

    (School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

Abstract

As a result of the ongoing development and advancement of green agriculture in China, consumers have benefited in numerous ways from green agricultural products. Consumers are increasingly attempting to purchase green agricultural products. However, there are still some problems in relation to green agricultural products, such as the inability of agricultural co-operatives to meet consumers’ demands due to the low return on investment of green agricultural products. To solve the above problems, this paper constructs an evolutionary game model involving the government, agricultural co-operatives, and consumers. In addition, simulation experiments were conducted to simulate and analyze the stakeholders’ strategic decisions in different situations. The results of this study show that government subsidies are effective in promoting the production of green agricultural products by agricultural cooperatives. The yield of green agricultural products, the degree of greenness of agricultural products, and the additional branding benefits of government subsidies for agricultural cooperatives can significantly influence the willingness of agricultural cooperatives to produce green agricultural products and the willingness of consumers to consume green agricultural products. Finally, some suggestions are given to solve the above problems. The findings of this study can provide a valuable reference for government subsidy strategy makers and valuable insights into the sustainable development of the green produce industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinglong Xin & Yaoqun Xu & Yi Zheng, 2024. "A Study on Green Agricultural Production Decision-Making by Agricultural Cooperatives under Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1219-:d:1330868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yunlong Sui & Qiang Gao, 2023. "Farmers’ Endowments, Technology Perception and Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Bin Li & Onur Boyabatlı & Buket Avcı, 2023. "Economic and Environmental Implications of Biomass Commercialization in Agricultural Processing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3561-3577, June.
    3. Feixiao Wang & Yaoqun Xu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Quality of Agricultural Products in Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Iain Davies & Zoe Lee & Ine Ahonkhai, 2012. "Do Consumers Care About Ethical-Luxury?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 37-51, March.
    5. Peng, Hongjun & Pang, Tao, 2019. "Optimal strategies for a three-level contract-farming supply chain with subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 274-286.
    6. Krittinee Nuttavuthisit & John Thøgersen, 2017. "The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Green Products: The Case of Organic Food," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 323-337, January.
    7. Achabou, Mohamed Akli & Dekhili, Sihem, 2013. "Luxury and sustainable development: Is there a match?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1896-1903.
    8. Lin, Wensheng & Huang, Jikun, 2021. "Impacts of agricultural incentive policies on land rental prices: New evidence from China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Tajbakhsh, Alireza & Mosadegh Sedghy, Bahareh, 2021. "The reflection of competition and coordination on organic agribusiness supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Mao, Hui & Zhou, Li & Ying, RuiYao & Pan, Dan, 2021. "Time Preferences and green agricultural technology adoption: Field evidence from rice farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victoria-Sophie Osburg & Iain Davies & Vignesh Yoganathan & Fraser McLeay, 2021. "Perspectives, Opportunities and Tensions in Ethical and Sustainable Luxury: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 201-210, March.
    2. Sharma, Amalesh & Soni, Mauli & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Haque, Tanjum, 2022. "From silos to synergies: A systematic review of luxury in marketing research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 893-907.
    3. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Anne Michaut-Denizeau, 2020. "Are millennials really more sensitive to sustainable luxury? A cross-generational international comparison of sustainability consciousness when buying luxury," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 35-47, January.
    4. Janssen, Catherine & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Leblanc, Sina, 2017. "Should luxury brands say it out loud? Brand conspicuousness and consumer perceptions of responsible luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 167-174.
    5. Cesare Amatulli & Matteo Angelis & Alessandro M. Peluso & Isabella Soscia & Gianluigi Guido, 2019. "The Effect of Negative Message Framing on Green Consumption: An Investigation of the Role of Shame," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 1111-1132, July.
    6. Kong, Hyun Min & Witmaier, Alexander & Ko, Eunju, 2021. "Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 640-651.
    7. Karatzas, Stelios & Kapoulas, Alexandros & Priporas, Constantinos Vasilios, 2019. "Consumers' perceptions on complexity and prospects of ethical luxury: Qualitative insights from Taiwan," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 224-232.
    8. Amatulli, Cesare & De Angelis, Matteo & Pino, Giovanni & Guido, Gianluigi, 2020. "An investigation of unsustainable luxury: How guilt drives negative word-of-mouth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 821-836.
    9. Koronaki, Eirini & Kyrousi, Antigone G. & Panigyrakis, George G., 2018. "The emotional value of arts-based initiatives: Strengthening the luxury brand–consumer relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 406-413.
    10. Oguzhan Essiz & Aysu Senyuz, 2024. "Predicting the value‐based determinants of sustainable luxury consumption: A multi‐analytical approach and pathway to sustainable development in the luxury industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1721-1758, March.
    11. Wen-Yun Chang & Viriya Taecharungroj & Supara Kapasuwan, 2022. "Sustainable Luxury Consumers’ Preferences and Segments: Conjoint and Cluster Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Arrigo, Elisa, 2018. "The flagship stores as sustainability communication channels for luxury fashion retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 170-177.
    13. Sara Alghanim & Nelson Oly Ndubisi, 2022. "The Paradox of Sustainability and Luxury Consumption: The Role of Value Perceptions and Consumer Income," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    14. Victoria-Sophie Osburg & Vignesh Yoganathan & Fabian Bartsch & Mbaye Fall Diallo & Hongfei Liu, 2024. "How Sustainable Luxury Influences Product Value Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions: A Comparative Study of Emerging vs. Developed Markets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 713-738, May.
    15. Mbaye Fall Diallo & Norchène Ben Dahmane Mouelhi & Mahesh Gadekar & Marie Schill, 2021. "CSR Actions, Brand Value, and Willingness to Pay a Premium Price for Luxury Brands: Does Long-Term Orientation Matter?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 241-260, March.
    16. Yanzi Li & Jiahui Xu & Fuqiang Liu & Xinshi Zhang, 2024. "Impact and Mechanism of Digital Information Selection on Farmers’ Ecological Production Technology Adoption: A Study on Wheat Farmers in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Quach, Sara & Septianto, Felix & Thaichon, Park & Nasution, Reza Ashari, 2022. "The role of art infusion in enhancing pro-environmental luxury brand advertising," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Feng, Yunting & Tong, Xun & Zhu, Qinghua, 2020. "The market value of sustainable practices in the luxury industry: An identity mismatch and institutional theoretical perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    19. Jennifer Kunz & Stephanie May & Holger J. Schmidt, 2020. "Sustainable luxury: current status and perspectives for future research," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 541-601, July.
    20. Adıgüzel, Feray & Donato, Carmela, 2021. "Proud to be sustainable: Upcycled versus recycled luxury products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 137-146.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1219-:d:1330868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.