IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p810-d1321038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian Approach to Infer the Sustainable Use of Artificial Reefs in Fisheries and Recreation

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Ramos

    (Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-Being (CinTurs), University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

  • Benjamin Drakeford

    (Centre for Blue Governance (CBG), University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, UK)

  • Ana Madiedo

    (Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-Being (CinTurs), University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
    Faculty of Sciences and Technology (FCT), University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

  • Joana Costa

    (Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-Being (CinTurs), University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
    Faculty of Sciences and Technology (FCT), University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

  • Francisco Leitão

    (Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

Abstract

The presence of artificial reefs (ARs) in the south of Portugal that were deployed a few decades ago and the corroboration of fishing patterns and other activities related to the use of these habitats have not been followed. It is important to note that monitoring the use of ARs was difficult in the past but is currently facilitated by the application of non-intrusive tools. In the present study, an approach is developed where, based on monitoring data from fishing and non-fishing boats, influence diagrams (IDs) are constructed to provide some evidence on fisheries or other use patterns and consequent AR effectiveness as coastal tools. These IDs allow us to infer various usefulness scenarios, namely catches, which are tangible, and satisfaction, which is intangible, and overall assessment of ARs and nearby areas in terms of human activities. After calibrating the Bayesian ID based on monitoring evidence, the obtained model was evaluated for several scenarios. In the base case, which assumes the occurrence of more fishing than recreation (assuming 3:1, respectively), the obtained utility is 18.64% (catches) and 31.96% (satisfaction). Of the scenarios run, the one that obtained the best results in the utility nodes together was the second one. The use of these tailored tools and approaches seems to be of fundamental importance for the adequate management of coastal infrastructures, particularly with regard to the inference of fishing resources and their sustainable use. An adequate interpretation based on the use of these tools implies being able to safeguard the ecological balance and economic sustainability of the communities operating in these areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Ramos & Benjamin Drakeford & Ana Madiedo & Joana Costa & Francisco Leitão, 2024. "A Bayesian Approach to Infer the Sustainable Use of Artificial Reefs in Fisheries and Recreation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:810-:d:1321038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/810/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/810/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedro Valadas Monteiro, 2016. "The role of knowledge-intensive service activities on inducing innovation in co-opetition strategies: lessons from the maritime cluster of the Algarve region," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 78-95.
    2. Wise, Laura & Murta, Alberto G. & Carvalho, Joao P. & Mesquita, Marta, 2012. "Qualitative modelling of fishermen's behaviour in a pelagic fishery," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 112-122.
    3. Shenoy, Prakash P., 1994. "A comparison of graphical techniques for decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Roa-Ureta, Ruben H. & Santos, Miguel N. & Leitão, Francisco, 2019. "Modelling long-term fisheries data to resolve the attraction versus production dilemma of artificial reefs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Xuyang Han & Costas Armenakis & Mojgan Jadidi, 2021. "Modeling Vessel Behaviours by Clustering AIS Data Using Optimized DBSCAN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Naranjo-Madrigal, Helven & van Putten, Ingrid & Norman-López, Ana, 2015. "Understanding socio-ecological drivers of spatial allocation choice in a multi-species artisanal fishery: A Bayesian network modeling approach," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 102-115.
    7. Ross D. Shachter, 1986. "Evaluating Influence Diagrams," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 871-882, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prakash Shenoy, 1998. "Game Trees For Decision Analysis," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 149-171, April.
    2. Ruth Y. Dicdican & Yacov Y. Haimes, 2005. "Relating multiobjective decision trees to the multiobjective risk impact analysis method," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 95-108.
    3. Concha Bielza & Peter Müller & David Ríos Insua, 1999. "Decision Analysis by Augmented Probability Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 995-1007, July.
    4. Guo, Rui & Shenoy, Prakash P., 1996. "A note on Kirkwood's algebraic method for decision problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 628-638, September.
    5. Guezguez, Wided & Ben Amor, Nahla & Mellouli, Khaled, 2009. "Qualitative possibilistic influence diagrams based on qualitative possibilistic utilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 223-238, May.
    6. Lander, Diane M. & Pinches, George E., 1998. "Challenges to the Practical Implementation of Modeling and Valuing Real Options," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(3, Part 2), pages 537-567.
    7. Shenoy, Prakash P., 2000. "Valuation network representation and solution of asymmetric decision problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 579-608, March.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:1:y:2006:i::p:162-173 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Fernandez del Pozo, J. A. & Bielza, C. & Gomez, M., 2005. "A list-based compact representation for large decision tables management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(3), pages 638-662, February.
    10. Els Hannes & Diana Kusumastuti & Maikel Espinosa & Davy Janssens & Koen Vanhoof & Geert Wets, 2012. "Mental maps and travel behaviour: meanings and models," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 143-165, April.
    11. Bielza, Concha & Gómez, Manuel & Shenoy, Prakash P., 2011. "A review of representation issues and modeling challenges with influence diagrams," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 227-241, June.
    12. Zitrou, Athena & Bedford, Tim & Walls, Lesley, 2010. "Bayes geometric scaling model for common cause failure rates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 70-76.
    13. Tan, Kim Hua & Zhan, YuanZhu & Ji, Guojun & Ye, Fei & Chang, Chingter, 2015. "Harvesting big data to enhance supply chain innovation capabilities: An analytic infrastructure based on deduction graph," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 223-233.
    14. Robert F. Nease JR, 1996. "Do Violations of the Axioms of Expected Utility Theory Threaten Decision Analysis?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 16(4), pages 399-403, October.
    15. Eisuke Watanabe & Ryuichi Shibasaki, 2023. "Extraction of Bunkering Services from Automatic Identification System Data and Their International Comparisons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Khakzad, Nima, 2021. "Optimal firefighting to prevent domino effects: Methodologies based on dynamic influence diagram and mathematical programming," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    17. Lopez-Diaz, Miguel & Rodriguez-Muniz, Luis J., 2007. "Influence diagrams with super value nodes involving imprecise information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(1), pages 203-219, May.
    18. Oepping, Hardy, 2016. "Ein Bayes-Netz zur Analyse des Absturzrisikos im Gerüstbau [A Bayesian network for analysing the risk of falling from height in scaffolding]," MPRA Paper 73602, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. van Dijk, Diana & Haijema, Rene & Hendrix, Eligius M.T. & Groeneveld, Rolf A. & van Ierland, Ekko C., 2013. "Fluctuating quota and management costs under multiannual adjustment of fish quota," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 230-238.
    20. Mancuso, A. & Compare, M. & Salo, A. & Zio, E., 2021. "Optimal Prognostics and Health Management-driven inspection and maintenance strategies for industrial systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    21. Sean Pascoe & Renae Tobin & Jill Windle & Toni Cannard & Nadine Marshall & Zobaidul Kabir & Nicole Flint, 2016. "Developing a Social, Cultural and Economic Report Card for a Regional Industrial Harbour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:810-:d:1321038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.