IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11268-d1550166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Decarbonizing Strategies of China’s Iron and Steelmaking Industry: A Comprehensive Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zichao Wei

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Kai Xue

    (College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
    Beijing Yanshan Earth Critical Zone National Research Station, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)

  • Guangwen Hu

    (College of Material Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yufeng Wu

    (College of Material Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yanfen Wang

    (College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    Beijing Yanshan Earth Critical Zone National Research Station, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
    State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System Science (LATPES), Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Decarbonizing the iron and steelmaking industry is critical for China to pursue the net-zero emissions target and advance sustainable industrialization (SDG 9). This paper addresses the urgent need for decarbonization strategies in this sector, aiming to align with China’s carbon neutrality goals by 2060. By reviewing the current technological advancements and potential pathways for deep decarbonization, including process optimization, hydrogen-based direct reduction, and carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), these decarbonization technologies are categorized into six strategic approaches: systemic energy efficiency improvement, resource recycling, process optimization and innovation, breakthrough smelting, product iterative upgrading, and CCUS. These strategies also align with SDG 13 (climate action) by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy) through the promotion of clean energy technologies. These strategies are evaluated for their emission reduction potential and technological maturity. The results indicate that, while efficiency improvements and resource recycling are currently the most mature and widely implemented strategy, significant breakthroughs in hydrogen metallurgy and CCUS are essential for achieving long-term carbon neutrality. Based on an analysis, a comprehensive roadmap is proposed, detailing the near-term to long-term actions required for the industry’s transition. The near-term focus (up to 2030) should be on enhancing energy efficiency and process optimization, whereas the mid-term (2030–2050) focus should emphasize the adoption of hydrogen-based technologies and CCUS. By the 2050–2060 period, the industry should achieve widespread commercialization of breakthrough smelting technologies and CCUS, ensuring the achievement of carbon neutrality. This study intends to provide a systematic framework and strategic recommendations for policymakers and industry stakeholders to guide the decarbonization of China’s iron and steelmaking sector, addressing both technological and economic challenges to achieve sustainable and low-carbon development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zichao Wei & Kai Xue & Guangwen Hu & Yufeng Wu & Yanfen Wang, 2024. "The Decarbonizing Strategies of China’s Iron and Steelmaking Industry: A Comprehensive Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11268-:d:1550166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lulu Song & Stijn Ewijk & Eric Masanet & Takuma Watari & Fanran Meng & Jonathan M. Cullen & Zhi Cao & Wei-Qiang Chen, 2023. "Author Correction: China’s bulk material loops can be closed but deep decarbonization requires demand reduction," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(11), pages 1272-1272, November.
    2. Ruochong Xu & Dan Tong & Steven J. Davis & Xinying Qin & Jing Cheng & Qinren Shi & Yang Liu & Cuihong Chen & Liu Yan & Xizhe Yan & Huaxuan Wang & Dongsheng Zheng & Kebin He & Qiang Zhang, 2023. "Plant-by-plant decarbonization strategies for the global steel industry," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(10), pages 1067-1074, October.
    3. Michele Andreotti & Carlo Brondi & Davide Micillo & Ron Zevenhoven & Johannes Rieger & Ayoung Jo & Anne-Laure Hettinger & Jan Bollen & Enrico Malfa & Claudio Trevisan & Klaus Peters & Delphine Snaet &, 2023. "SDGs in the EU Steel Sector: A Critical Review of Sustainability Initiatives and Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Di Foggia, Giacomo & Beccarello, Massimo, 2024. "Decarbonization in the European Steel Industry: Strategies, Risks, and Commitments," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Articles .
    5. Idiano D’Adamo & Cristina Di Carlo & Massimo Gastaldi & Edouard Nicolas Rossi & Antonio Felice Uricchio, 2024. "Economic Performance, Environmental Protection and Social Progress: A Cluster Analysis Comparison towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    6. An, Runying & Yu, Biying & Li, Ru & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2018. "Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China’s iron and steel industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 862-880.
    7. Wang, R.Q. & Jiang, L. & Wang, Y.D. & Font-Palma, C. & Skoulou, V. & Roskilly, A.P., 2024. "Woody biomass waste derivatives in decarbonised blast furnace ironmaking process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Kim, Yeonbae & Worrell, Ernst, 2002. "International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 827-838, August.
    9. Kirschen, Marcus & Badr, Karim & Pfeifer, Herbert, 2011. "Influence of direct reduced iron on the energy balance of the electric arc furnace in steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6146-6155.
    10. Ren, Ming & Lu, Pantao & Liu, Xiaorui & Hossain, M.S. & Fang, Yanru & Hanaoka, Tatsuya & O'Gallachoir, Brian & Glynn, James & Dai, Hancheng, 2021. "Decarbonizing China’s iron and steel industry from the supply and demand sides for carbon neutrality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    11. Tianyang Lei & Daoping Wang & Xiang Yu & Shijun Ma & Weichen Zhao & Can Cui & Jing Meng & Shu Tao & Dabo Guan, 2023. "Global iron and steel plant CO2 emissions and carbon-neutrality pathways," Nature, Nature, vol. 622(7983), pages 514-520, October.
    12. Chen, Wenying & Yin, Xiang & Ma, Ding, 2014. "A bottom-up analysis of China’s iron and steel industrial energy consumption and CO2 emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1174-1183.
    13. Zhang, Hanxin & Sun, Wenqiang & Li, Weidong & Ma, Guangyu, 2022. "A carbon flow tracing and carbon accounting method for exploring CO2 emissions of the iron and steel industry: An integrated material–energy–carbon hub," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    14. Lulu Song & Stijn Ewijk & Eric Masanet & Takuma Watari & Fanran Meng & Jonathan M. Cullen & Zhi Cao & Wei-Qiang Chen, 2023. "China’s bulk material loops can be closed but deep decarbonization requires demand reduction," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(10), pages 1136-1143, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Biying & Dai, Ying & Fu, Jiahao & Qi, Jiahong & Li, Xia, 2025. "Industrial risks assessment for the large-scale development of electric arc furnace steelmaking technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    2. Wang, Xiaoyang & Yu, Biying & An, Runying & Sun, Feihu & Xu, Shuo, 2022. "An integrated analysis of China’s iron and steel industry towards carbon neutrality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    3. Yang, Honghua & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng, 2023. "Tracing China's steel use from steel flows in the production system to steel footprints in the consumption system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Liu, Xianmei & Liu, Yuxiang & Bai, Caiquan & Peng, Rui & Chi, Yuanying, 2024. "Pathways for decarbonizing China's iron and steel industry using cost-effective mitigation technologies: An integrated analysis with top-down and bottom-up models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    5. Sheinbaum-Pardo, Claudia, 2016. "Decomposition analysis from demand services to material production: The case of CO2 emissions from steel produced for automobiles in Mexico," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 245-255.
    6. Vögele, Stefan & Grajewski, Matthias & Govorukha, Kristina & Rübbelke, Dirk, 2020. "Challenges for the European steel industry: Analysis, possible consequences and impacts on sustainable development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    7. Li, Yibo & Li, Juan & Sun, Mei & Guo, Yanzi & Cheng, Faxin & Gao, Cuixia, 2024. "Analysis of carbon neutrality technology path selection in the steel industry under policy incentives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    8. Wang, Ying & Yan, Yuxin & Liu, Hanxiao & Luo, Xiang & Wu, Tao & Zheng, Chenghang & Lin, Qingyang & Gao, Xiang, 2025. "An integrated assessment model for cost-effective long-term decarbonization pathways in China's iron and steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Yihan Wang & Zongguo Wen & Mao Xu & Christian Doh Dinga, 2025. "Long-term transformation in China’s steel sector for carbon capture and storage technology deployment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Song, Weiming & Zhou, Jianan & Li, Yujie & Yang, Jian & Cheng, Rijin, 2021. "New technology for producing high-quality combustible gas by high-temperature reaction of dust-removal coke powder in mixed atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Yihan Wang & Chen Chen & Yuan Tao & Zongguo Wen, 2025. "Uneven renewable energy supply constrains the decarbonization effects of excessively deployed hydrogen-based DRI technology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Shao, Tianming & Pan, Xunzhang & Li, Xiang & Zhou, Sheng & Zhang, Shu & Chen, Wenying, 2022. "China's industrial decarbonization in the context of carbon neutrality: A sub-sectoral analysis based on integrated modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Harvey, L.D. Danny, 2024. "A bottom-up assessment of recent (2016–20) energy use by the global iron and steel industry constrained to match a top-down (International Energy Agency) assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    14. Fang Wan & Jizu Li & Yunfei Han & Xilong Yao, 2024. "Research of the Impact of Hydrogen Metallurgy Technology on the Reduction of the Chinese Steel Industry’s Carbon Dioxide Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Zhang, Lei & Jiang, Peng & Zhang, Yibo & Fan, Yee Van & Geng, Yong, 2024. "Recycling impacts of renewable energy generation-related rare earth resources: A SWOT-based strategical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    16. Zhang, Hanxin & Sun, Wenqiang & Li, Weidong & Ma, Guangyu, 2022. "A carbon flow tracing and carbon accounting method for exploring CO2 emissions of the iron and steel industry: An integrated material–energy–carbon hub," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    17. Sinha, Rakesh Kumar & Chaturvedi, Nitin Dutt, 2019. "A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Yongxia Chen & Zhe Rao & Lin Yuan & Tianlong Meng, 2025. "Evaluation of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction in Steel Enterprises Using an Improved Dempster–Shafer Evidence Theory: A Case Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-26, April.
    19. Wang, Peng & Zhao, Shen & Dai, Tao & Peng, Kun & Zhang, Qi & Li, Jiashuo & Chen, Wei-Qiang, 2022. "Regional disparities in steel production and restrictions to progress on global decarbonization: A cross-national analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    20. Qiu, Ziyang & Du, Tao & Yue, Qiang & Na, Hongming & Sun, Jingchao & Yuan, Yuxing & Che, Zichang & Wang, Yisong & Li, Yingnan, 2023. "A multi-parameters evaluation on exergy for hydrogen metallurgy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11268-:d:1550166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.