IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10280-d1528128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement of Free Trade Zones’ Investment Attraction: Sustainable Corporate Development Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ji Li

    (Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Xv Liang

    (Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Xiaomeng Du

    (National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Shunzhi Xv

    (Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

This study explores the measurement of FTZs’ investment attraction from a sustainable corporate development perspective. Through a comprehensive evaluation framework, the study assesses FTZs’ investment attraction across five indicators: urban business environment, economic development strength, innovation and openness vitality, urban environmental friendliness, and high-quality enterprise development. The weights of each layer’s indicators are calculated using entropy weight and the PCA method. The evaluation results of the investment attractiveness of China’s FTZs show that the investment attraction of FTZs in different regions exhibits hierarchical characteristics and unbalanced development. East China and South China occupy the forefront. Disparities in provincial FTZs’ developmental balance are conspicuous. Guangdong, Shanghai, and Beijing top the charts in terms of congruence with their overall environment rankings, whereas Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Fujian exhibit a mismatch between their sub-indices and their relatively strong overall investment attractiveness. Conversely, Henan, Anhui, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Hunan, and Tianjin, though balanced in sub-environmental development, lag in overall investment appeal, necessitating concerted efforts towards balanced development. On the whole, compared with other indicators, innovation and openness vitality and high-quality enterprise development seem relatively weak. Drawing from our insights, foreign investors can choose free trade zones according to their own development needs. Policymakers can devise targeted interventions to bolster FTZs’ investment attractiveness, tailored to scores and rankings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji Li & Xv Liang & Xiaomeng Du & Shunzhi Xv, 2024. "Measurement of Free Trade Zones’ Investment Attraction: Sustainable Corporate Development Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10280-:d:1528128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10280/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10280/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avraham Ebenstein & Maoyong Fan & Michael Greenstone & Guojun He & Peng Yin & Maigeng Zhou, 2015. "Growth, Pollution, and Life Expectancy: China from 1991-2012," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 226-231, May.
    2. Julien Chaisse & Georgios Dimitropoulos, 2021. "Special Economic Zones in International Economic Law: Towards Unilateral Economic Law," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 229-257.
    3. Douglas Z Zeng, 2021. "The Past, Present, and Future of Special Economic Zones and Their Impact," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 259-275.
    4. Lee Branstetter & Ray Fisman & C. Fritz Foley & Kamal Saggi, 2023. "Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kamal Saggi (ed.), Technology Transfer, Foreign Direct Investment, and the Protection of Intellectual Property in the Global Economy, chapter 13, pages 307-316, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Yijia Song & Ruichen Deng & Ruoxi Liu & Qian Peng, 2020. "Effects of Special Economic Zones on FDI in Emerging Economies: Does Institutional Quality Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Zhang, Hongxia & Kim, Heeho, 2022. "Institutional quality and FDI location: A threshold model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Murali Patibandla, 2007. "Pattern of foreign direct investment in developing economies: a comparative analysis of China and India," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2/3/4), pages 356-377.
    8. Manjiao Chi, 2021. "Regulation of Special Economic Zones Through Regional Trade Agreements: Confronting the Synergy Issue," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 423-442.
    9. Primo Braga, Carlos A & Fink, Carsten, 1998. "Reforming Intellectual Property Rights Regimes: Challenges for Developing Countries," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(4), pages 537-554, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nagano, Mamoru, 2013. "Similarities and differences among cross-border M&A and greenfield FDI determinants: Evidence from Asia and Oceania," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 100-118.
    2. Ghosh, Arghya & Morita, Hodaka & Nguyen, Xuan, 2018. "Technology spillovers, intellectual property rights, and export-platform FDI," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 171-190.
    3. Douglas Zhihua Zeng, 2022. "What Determines the Heterogeneous Performance of Special Economic Zones? Evidence from Sub‐Sahara Africa," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(4), pages 495-506, September.
    4. Joseph Owuondo, 2024. "Evaluating the Impact of Participatory Budgeting on Special Economic Zone Project Implementation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 4861-4869, October.
    5. Ju, Heng & Tang, Yao & Zhang, Meilan, 2024. "Air Pollution's Grip: Drug Cost and Its Heterogeneity in China," MPRA Paper 121154, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Armel Ngami & Thomas Seegmuller, 2021. "Pollution and growth: The role of pension in the efficiency of health and environmental policies," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 17(4), pages 390-415, December.
    7. Lin, Jenny X. & Lincoln, William F., 2017. "Pirate's treasure," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 235-245.
    8. Evangelina Dardati & Ramiro de Elejalde & Eugenio Giolito, 2024. "On the short‐term impact of pollution: The effect of PM 2.5 on emergency room visits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 482-508, March.
    9. Ming Liu & Sumner LaCroix, 2011. "The Impact of Stronger Property Rights in Pharmaceuticals on Innovation in Developed and Developing Countries," Working Papers 201116, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
    10. Anna Dugan & Alexia Prskawetz & Natacha Raffin, 2024. "The environment, life expectancy, and growth in overlapping generations models: A survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1593-1621, December.
    11. Neves, Pedro Cunha & Afonso, Oscar & Silva, Diana & Sochirca, Elena, 2021. "The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 196-209.
    12. Feng, Wei & Sun, Shujun & Yuan, Hang, 2023. "Research on the efficiency of factor allocation in the pilot free trade zones," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 727-745.
    13. Lohwasser, Johannes & Bolognesi, Thomas & Schaffer, Axel, 2025. "Impacts of population, affluence and urbanization on local air pollution and land transformation – A regional STIRPAT analysis for German districts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. Nabokin, Tatjana, 2014. "Global Investment Decisions and Patent Protection: Evidence from German Multinationals," Discussion Papers in Economics 21266, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    15. Alimov, Azizjon & Officer, Micah S., 2017. "Intellectual property rights and cross-border mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 360-377.
    16. Jin, Wei & Zhang, ZhongXiang, "undated". "China’s Pursuit of Environmentally Sustainable Development: Harnessing the New Engine of Technological Innovation," EIA: Climate Change: Economic Impacts and Adaptation 232926, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    17. Luo, Weixiang & Xie, Yu, 2020. "Economic growth, income inequality and life expectancy in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Xiaoke Zhang, 2022. "Understanding innovation policy governance: A disaggregated approach," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 303-329, May.
    19. repec:gig:chaktu:v:39:y:2010:i:4:p:111-142 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Sunil Kanwar, 2013. "Innovation, Productivity and IPRs," Working papers 230, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    21. Daniel Nepelski & Giuditta De Prato, 2020. "Technological complexity and economic development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 448-470, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10280-:d:1528128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.