IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9719-d1516317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing a Framework to Support Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Sustainable Public Facility Location: Insights from Centro Hospitalar Oeste, Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Gonçalves

    (CiTUA, Centre for Innovation in Territory Urbanism and Architecture, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Carlos Gonçalves

    (GOVCOPP, Research Unity on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Sérgio Barroso

    (CEDRU, Centre for Regional Development and Urban Studies, 1600-454 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Sílvia Spolaor

    (CiTUA, Centre for Innovation in Territory Urbanism and Architecture, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Liliana Calado

    (CEDRU, Centre for Regional Development and Urban Studies, 1600-454 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Sónia Vieira

    (CEDRU, Centre for Regional Development and Urban Studies, 1600-454 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

Finding the optimal location for regional public facilities has historically been a challenge. Numerous studies have sought to find the best solutions, yet few of them provided a framework to incorporate criteria and indicators that look beyond spatial dimensions, aiming at a more sustainable solution fostering economic development, territorial efficiency, environmental sensitivity and, of course, social justice. This research is based on the issues raised by the implementation of the new Centro Hospitalar Oeste (CHO) in Portugal, which has been extensively evaluated in the decision-making process for many years. Recognising that location decisions involve more than spatial concerns, this article proposes the identification of criteria and indicators that integrate social, economic and territorial perspectives to support the construction of a decision-making model based on sustainability principles. A four-phase, sixteen-stage multiple-criteria methodology is proposed to build a technical instrument for overcoming political conflicts and ensuring efficient, rational and participatory processes for public investment allocation. This article offers evidence from a real spatial planning issue to provide a useful framework to promote a more significant and comprehensive social and economic impact of the public investment made in a regional-level facility. This framework helps to determine the fundamental criteria of evaluation and operationalise sustainable and balanced models for the location of public facilities that take into consideration an integrated territorial approach. The methodology presented is open and flexible so that it can be applied and adapted to different contexts and facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Gonçalves & Carlos Gonçalves & Sérgio Barroso & Sílvia Spolaor & Liliana Calado & Sónia Vieira, 2024. "Designing a Framework to Support Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Sustainable Public Facility Location: Insights from Centro Hospitalar Oeste, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9719-:d:1516317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loumeau, Gabriel, 2023. "Locating Public Facilities: Theory and Micro Evidence from Paris," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Florien M. Kruse & Niek W. Stadhouders & Eddy M. Adang & Stef Groenewoud & Patrick P.T. Jeurissen, 2018. "Do private hospitals outperform public hospitals regarding efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care in the European Union? A literature review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 434-453, April.
    3. Giuseppe Moscelli & Luigi Siciliani & Nils Gutacker & Hugh Gravelle, 2016. "Location, quality and choice of hospital: Evidence from England 2002/3 - 2012/13," Working Papers 123cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    4. Teixeira, Joao C. & Antunes, Antonio P., 2008. "A hierarchical location model for public facility planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 92-104, February.
    5. Marsh, Michael T. & Schilling, David A., 1994. "Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Mestre, Ana Maria & Oliveira, Mónica Duarte & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2015. "Location–allocation approaches for hospital network planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 791-806.
    7. Batta, Rajan & Lejeune, Miguel & Prasad, Srinivas, 2014. "Public facility location using dispersion, population, and equity criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 819-829.
    8. Muhammet Gul & Ali Fuat Guneri, 2021. "Hospital Location Selection: A Systematic Literature Review on Methodologies and Applications," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-14, February.
    9. Mateus, Ricardo & Ferreira, J.A. & Carreira, Joao, 2008. "Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): Central Porto high-speed railway station," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    2. Argyris, Nikolaos & Karsu, Özlem & Yavuz, Mirel, 2022. "Fair resource allocation: Using welfare-based dominance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 560-578.
    3. Cardoso, Teresa & Oliveira, Mónica Duarte & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana & Nickel, Stefan, 2016. "Moving towards an equitable long-term care network: A multi-objective and multi-period planning approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 69-85.
    4. Zhengna Song & Tinggan Yan & Yunjian Ge, 2018. "Spatial Equilibrium Allocation of Urban Large Public General Hospitals Based on the Welfare Maximization Principle: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Yoon Ha Lee & Ji Soo Lee & Seung Chan Baek & Won Hwa Hong, 2020. "Spatial Equity with Census Population Data vs. Floating Population Data: The Distribution of Earthquake Evacuation Shelters in Daegu, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Levaggi, Laura & Levaggi, Rosella, 2020. "Is there scope for mixed markets in the provision of hospital care?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Liao, Cong & Scheuer, Bronte & Dai, Teqi & Tian, Yuan, 2020. "Optimizing the spatial assignment of schools to reduce both inequality of educational opportunity and potential opposition rate through introducing random mechanism into proximity-based system," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Maria Barbati & Giuseppe Bruno & Alfredo Marín, 2016. "Balancing the arrival times of users in a two-stage location problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 273-288, November.
    9. Chung, Byung Do & Park, Sungjae & Kwon, Changhyun, 2018. "Equitable distribution of recharging stations for electric vehicles," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-11.
    10. Dongxu Li & Min Su & Xi Guo & Weile Zhang & Tianjiao Zhang, 2022. "The Effect of Medical Choice on Health Costs of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Chronic Disease: Based on Principal-Agent Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Moscone, Francesco & Siciliani, Luigi & Tosetti, Elisa & Vittadini, Giorgio, 2020. "Do public and private hospitals differ in quality? Evidence from Italy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. Young Hoon Lee & Yong Ho Choi, 2020. "Optimal cost adjustment for a selfish routing healthcare network," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 585-604, December.
    13. Comendeiro-Maaløe, Micaela & Ridao-López, Manuel & Gorgemans, Sophie & Bernal-Delgado, Enrique, 2019. "A comparative performance analysis of a renowned public private partnership for health care provision in Spain between 2003 and 2015," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(4), pages 412-418.
    14. Winter, Vera & Thomsen, Mette Kjærgaard & Schreyögg, Jonas & Blankart, Katharina & Duminy, Lize & Schoenenberger, Lukas & Ansah, John P. & Matchar, David & Blankart, Carl Rudolf & Oppel, Eva & Jensen,, 2019. "Improving Service Provision - The Health Care Services' Perspective," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 3(4), pages 163-183.
    15. José M. Cordero & Agustín García-García & Enrique Lau-Cortés & Cristina Polo, 2021. "Efficiency and Productivity Change of Public Hospitals in Panama: Do Management Schemes Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Carayannis, Elias G. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Bento, Paulo & Ferreira, João J.M. & Jalali, Marjan S. & Fernandes, Bernardo M.Q., 2018. "Developing a socio-technical evaluation index for tourist destination competitiveness using cognitive mapping and MCDA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 147-158.
    17. Daniel Avdic & Tugba Bueyuekdurmus & Giuseppe Moscelli & Adam Pilny & Ieva Sriubaite, 2018. "Subjective and objective quality reporting and choice of hospital: Evidence from maternal care services in Germany," CINCH Working Paper Series 1803, Universitaet Duisburg-Essen, Competent in Competition and Health.
    18. Rodolfo Mendoza-Gómez & Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado & Karla B. Valenzuela-Ocaña, 2019. "An Efficient Decision-Making Approach for the Planning of Diagnostic Services in a Segmented Healthcare System," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1631-1665, September.
    19. Francisco Javier Santos Arteaga & Debora Di Caprio & David Cucchiari & Josep M Campistol & Federico Oppenheimer & Fritz Diekmann & Ignacio Revuelta, 2021. "Modeling patients as decision making units: evaluating the efficiency of kidney transplantation through data envelopment analysis," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 55-71, March.
    20. Michael Johnson & David Turcotte & Felicia Sullivan, 2010. "What Foreclosed Homes Should a Municipality Purchase to Stabilize Vulnerable Neighborhoods?," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 363-388, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9719-:d:1516317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.