IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p9043-d1501934.html

Balancing Efficiency and Environmental Impacts in Greek Viticultural Management Systems: An Integrated Life Cycle and Data Envelopment Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanouil Tziolas

    (Human-Machines Interaction (HUMAIN) Lab, Department of Computer Science, International Hellenic University (IHU), 65404 Kavala, Greece)

  • Aikaterini Karampatea

    (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Oenology, Democritus University of Thrace (DUT), 66100 Drama, Greece)

  • Eleftherios Karapatzak

    (Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-Demeter, P.O. Box 60458, Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • George F. Banias

    (Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre for Research and Technology-Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece)

Abstract

Greek wines excel in quality and exports, but the viticultural sector faces significant challenges from complex supply chains, shifting European policies, and the growing need for sustainability amidst climate change and economic pressures. External environmental costs could affect significantly the decision-making process of farmers, reflecting a broader evaluation of sustainability in viticulture. This study evaluates the economic and environmental impacts of organic, integrated, and conventional viticulture management systems in Drama, Greece using a life cycle (LC) approach and data envelopment analysis (DEA) to determine efficiency, quantify environmental impacts in monetary terms, and incorporate these costs into the analysis. Organic management systems have lower energy consumption and emissions compared to integrated and conventional systems, with organic systems ranging from 4546 to 6573 kWh/ha in energy use and 1358 to 1795 kg CO 2 eq./ha in emissions, while integrated and conventional systems range from 9157 to 12,109 kWh/ha and 2961 to 3661 kg CO 2 eq./ha. The DEA analysis reveals that most organic systems perform efficiently when accounting for environmental costs, whereas conventional systems face significant efficiency declines, with only a few maintaining optimal performance. Policy-supported transitions based on the provider gets principle are crucial for balancing economic and environmental goals in viticulture, as the integration of shadow prices significantly impacts efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanouil Tziolas & Aikaterini Karampatea & Eleftherios Karapatzak & George F. Banias, 2024. "Balancing Efficiency and Environmental Impacts in Greek Viticultural Management Systems: An Integrated Life Cycle and Data Envelopment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9043-:d:1501934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9043/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9043/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozana Nadoveza Jelić & Jurica Šimurina, 2020. "Evaluating sectoral effects of agricultural nitrogen pollution reduction policy in Croatia within a CGE framework," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem & Rafiee, Shahin & Mohammadi, Ali, 2011. "Optimization of energy consumption and input costs for apple production in Iran using data envelopment analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 909-916.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Khoshroo, Alireza & Mulwa, Richard & Emrouznejad, Ali & Arabi, Behrouz, 2013. "A non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis approach for improving energy efficiency of grape production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 189-194.
    5. Sokol, Ondřej & Frýd, Lukáš, 2023. "DEA efficiency in agriculture: Measurement unit issues," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. de Ponti, Tomek & Rijk, Bert & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2012. "The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos & Georgios Kleftodimos & George Vlontzos & Panos M. Pardalos, 2023. "A systematic literature review of data envelopment analysis implementation in agriculture under the prism of sustainability," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-38, March.
    8. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, March.
    9. Verena Seufert & Navin Ramankutty & Jonathan A. Foley, 2012. "Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 229-232, May.
    10. James A. Tobey & Henri Smets, 1996. "The Polluter-Pays Principle in the Context of Agriculture and the Environment," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 63-87, January.
    11. Isabella Ghiglieno & Anna Simonetto & Luca Facciano & Marco Tonni & Pierluigi Donna & Leonardo Valenti & Gianni Gilioli, 2023. "Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Conventional and Organic Vineyards in Northern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Emmanouil Tziolas & Eleftherios Karapatzak & Ioannis Kalathas & Chris Lytridis & Spyridon Mamalis & Stefanos Koundouras & Theodore Pachidis & Vassilis G. Kaburlasos, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of Environmental/Energy Performance under Conventional Labor and Collaborative Robot Scenarios in Greek Viticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    13. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    14. Giacomo Falcone & Anna Irene De Luca & Teodora Stillitano & Alfio Strano & Giuseppa Romeo & Giovanni Gulisano, 2016. "Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Vine-Growing Combining Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Costing and Multicriterial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-34, August.
    15. Emmanouil Tziolas & Eleftherios Karapatzak & Ioannis Kalathas & Aikaterini Karampatea & Antonios Grigoropoulos & Aadil Bajoub & Theodore Pachidis & Vassilis G. Kaburlasos, 2023. "Assessing the Economic Performance of Multipurpose Collaborative Robots toward Skillful and Sustainable Viticultural Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Karafolas, Simeon, 2007. "Wine Roads in Greece: A Cooperation for the Development of Local Tourism in Rural Areas," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 35(01), pages 1-20.
    17. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2007. "Data Envelopment Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-45283-8, March.
    18. Taxidis, Efstratios T. & Menexes, George C. & Mamolos, Andreas P. & Tsatsarelis, Constantinos A. & Anagnostopoulos, Christos D. & Kalburtji, Kyriaki L., 2015. "Comparing organic and conventional olive groves relative to energy use and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the cultivation of two varieties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 117-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgios Bartzas & Maria Doula & Konstantinos Komnitsas, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment of Key Mediterranean Agricultural Products at the Farm Level Using GHG Measurements," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zehui & Xie, Jianhui, 2025. "Water constraint mitigation and agricultural productivity: Evidence from the China’s South-to-North Water Diversion Project," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Nadimi, Reza & Tokimatsu, Koji, 2019. "Potential energy saving via overall efficiency relying on quality of life," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 283-299.
    3. Cheng, Gang & Qian, Zhenhua, 2011. "Dea数据标准化方法及其在方向距离函数模型中的应用 [Data normalization for data envelopment analysis and its application to directional distance function]," MPRA Paper 31995, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Pin-Chih Wang & Yuh-Ming Lee & Chiu-Yang Chen, 2014. "Estimation of Resource Productivity and Efficiency: An Extended Evaluation of Sustainability Related to Material Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Houshyar, Ehsan & Azadi, Hossein & Almassi, Morteza & Sheikh Davoodi, Mohammad Javad & Witlox, Frank, 2012. "Sustainable and efficient energy consumption of corn production in Southwest Iran: Combination of multi-fuzzy and DEA modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 672-681.
    6. Wencheng Li & Lei Wang & Qi Wan & Weijia You & Shaowen Zhang, 2022. "A Configurational Analysis of Family Farm Management Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Jie Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Pengzhen Yin & Malin Song, 2017. "Measuring energy and environmental performance for regions in China by using DEA-based Malmquist indices," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 715-735, October.
    8. Joanna Domagała, 2021. "Economic and Environmental Aspects of Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Kenichi Kashiwagi & Hajime Kamiyama, 2023. "Effect of adoption of organic farming on technical efficiency of olive-growing farms: empirical evidence from West Bank of Palestine," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Tian, Dong & Zhang, Min & Xiong, Chuqiao & Mu, Weisong & Feng, Jianying, 2019. "Measuring the energy consumption and energy efficiency in two-harvest-a-year grape cultivation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Chung, Rebecca H. & Hadi, Sholih Nugroho, 2025. "Assessment of total factor productivity and methane efficiency of beef cattle producers worldwide," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem & Rafiee, Shahin & Jafari, Ali & Mohammadi, Ali, 2011. "Optimization of energy consumption for soybean production using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3765-3772.
    13. Aleksandra GÓRECKA & Joanna BARAN, 2018. "Efficiency of Investments in Regional Airports in Poland," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 26(38).
    14. Higham, L.E. & Handel, I. & Boden, L. & Moran, D., 2024. "Benchmarking sustainability performance in UK free-range laying hen flocks," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Necmi Kemal Avkiran, 2017. "An illustration of multiple-stakeholder perspective using a survey across Australia, China and Japan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 93-121, January.
    16. Kevin Nowag & Jitka Janová, 2024. "Micro-data efficiency evaluation of agricultural companies: The case of Germany and neighbouring countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(11), pages 565-576.
    17. Nsiri, Nour & Kleftodimos, Georgios & Drogué, Sophie, 2025. "Efficiency of agricultural systems in Morocco: A meta-frontier analysis of resource use and water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    18. Pérez, Karen & González-Araya, Marcela C. & Iriarte, Alfredo, 2017. "Energy and GHG emission efficiency in the Chilean manufacturing industry: Sectoral and regional analysis by DEA and Malmquist indexes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 290-302.
    19. Malgorzata Guzowska & Magdalena Kotnis, 2024. "Analysis of the Dynamic of Effectiveness of City Halls’ Social Networking Sites in Poland as a Factor in Building an Efficient Public E-Services," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1595-1611.
    20. Anirban Nandy & Piyush Kumar Singh & Alok Kumar Singh, 2021. "Systematic Review and Meta- regression Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Agricultural Production Systems," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(2), pages 396-421, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9043-:d:1501934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.