IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8281-d1484084.html

Consumers’ Evaluation of Vertebrates and Invertebrates through Price Premiums for Eco-Rice in Urban and Rural Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Qiuran Li

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramaki Azaaoba, Aobaku, Sendai 980-8572, Miyagi, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yusuke Kamimura

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramaki Azaaoba, Aobaku, Sendai 980-8572, Miyagi, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yamane Nagao

    (KRC Co., Ltd., Nagano 381-2217, Nagano, Japan)

  • Miyuki Takahashi

    (PricewaterhouseCoopers Japan LLC, Tokyo 100-0004, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Xintong Zhao

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramaki Azaaoba, Aobaku, Sendai 980-8572, Miyagi, Japan)

  • Tomoko Imoto

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramaki Azaaoba, Aobaku, Sendai 980-8572, Miyagi, Japan)

Abstract

Balancing food production and biodiversity conservation is a big challenge around the world. Eco-friendly agriculture has the potential to overcome these challenges and achieve sustainability. Although some studies show the high valuation of flagship species (e.g., attractive birds and fish) in paddy land where eco-friendly rice is cultivated, limited research has been performed concerning non-specific species such as generalists inhabiting rice paddies that also contribute to agro-biodiversity and ecosystem services. Therefore, this study assesses the valuation of non-flagship vertebrates and invertebrates by applying a choice experiment to vertebrate- and invertebrate-friendly rice. To understand the spatial/regional heterogeneity of the valuation, a questionnaire survey was distributed to both urban and rural citizens in Japan. Our results demonstrated that almost all respondents expressed a desire to protect both vertebrates and invertebrates, with more appreciation for vertebrates than for invertebrates. The analysis also found regional heterogeneity between urban and rural areas in terms of vertebrate and invertebrate evaluations and purchasing intentions. Our findings indicate marketing potential in Japan to promote eco-friendly rice production in relation to vertebrate and invertebrate conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiuran Li & Yusuke Kamimura & Yamane Nagao & Miyuki Takahashi & Xintong Zhao & Tomoko Imoto, 2024. "Consumers’ Evaluation of Vertebrates and Invertebrates through Price Premiums for Eco-Rice in Urban and Rural Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8281-:d:1484084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8281/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8281/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Batte, Marvin T. & Hooker, Neal H. & Haab, Timothy C. & Beaverson, Jeremy, 2007. "Putting their money where their mouths are: Consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 145-159, April.
    2. Becchetti, Leonardo & Salustri, Francesco & Scaramozzino, Pasquale, 2020. "Nudging and corporate environmental responsibility: A natural field experiment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Alan T. Sorensen, 2006. "Social learning and health plan choice," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(4), pages 929-945, December.
    4. Shao, Shuai & Tian, Zhihua & Fan, Meiting, 2018. "Do the rich have stronger willingness to pay for environmental protection? New evidence from a survey in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 83-94.
    5. Wei-Chun Tseng & Ya-Chu Yang & Yun-Ju Chen & Yung-Chih Chen, 2021. "Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Eco-Labeled Products of Formosan Pangolin ( Manis pentadactyla pentadactyla ) Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Alan T. Sorensen, 2006. "Social learning and health plan choice," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 37(4), pages 929-945, December.
    7. Jing Xie & Zhifeng Gao & Marilyn Swisher & Xin Zhao, 2016. "Consumers’ preferences for fresh broccolis: interactive effects between country of origin and organic labels," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(2), pages 181-191, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruomeng Cui & Dennis J. Zhang & Achal Bassamboo, 2019. "Learning from Inventory Availability Information: Evidence from Field Experiments on Amazon," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1216-1235, March.
    2. Engström, Per & Forsell, Eskil, 2018. "Demand effects of consumers’ stated and revealed preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 43-61.
    3. Muzhe Yang & Hsien-Ming Lien & Shin-Yi Chou, 2014. "Is There A Physician Peer Effect? Evidence From New Drug Prescriptions," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(1), pages 116-137, January.
    4. Karen Ruckman & Nilesh Saraf & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2015. "Market Positioning by IT Service Vendors Through Imitation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 100-126, March.
    5. Branko Boskovic, David P.Byrne, Arvind Magesan, 2012. "Herding Among Bureaucrats," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1158, The University of Melbourne.
    6. Stanfors, Maria & Karlsson, Tobias & Andersson, Lars-Fredrik & Eriksson, Liselotte, 2022. "Membership in Mutual Health Insurance Societies: The Case of Swedish Manufacturing, circa 1900," Lund Papers in Economic History 238, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    7. Ali, S. Nageeb, 2018. "Herding with costly information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 713-729.
    8. Hang Xiong & Puqing Wang & Georgiy Bobashev, 2018. "Multiple peer effects in the diffusion of innovations on social networks: a simulation study," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Ilan Lobel & Evan Sadler, 2016. "Preferences, Homophily, and Social Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 564-584, June.
    10. Anastasia Girshina & Thomas Y. Mathä & Michael Ziegelmeyer, 2024. "Peer Effects in Stock Market Participation: Evidence from Immigration," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 70(4), pages 1060-1088, December.
    11. Epstein, Gil S. & Heizler, Odelia & Israeli, Osnat, 2025. "Herd behavior and the intention to vaccinate against COVID-19," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Chahine, Salim & Daher, Mai, 2025. "Do portfolio companies learn from their peers? Evidence from venture capital funding," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Bryan Bollinger & Kenneth Gillingham & Stefan Lamp & Tsvetan Tsvetanov, 2024. "Promotional Campaign Duration and Word of Mouth in Solar Panel Adoption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 1132-1148, September.
    14. Mugerman, Yevgeny & Sade, Orly & Shayo, Moses, 2014. "Long term savings decisions: Financial reform, peer effects and ethnicity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 235-253.
    15. Malani, Anup & Holtzman, Phoebe & Imai, Kosuke & Kinnan, Cynthia & Miller, Morgen & Swaminathan, Shailender & Voena, Alessandra & Woda, Bartek & Conti, Gabriella, 2021. "Effect of Health Insurance in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IZA Discussion Papers 14913, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & David Schmeidler, 2015. "Consumer Choice as Constrained Imitation," PIER Working Paper Archive 15-013, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    17. Amedeo Piolatto, 2015. "Online booking and information: competition and welfare consequences of review aggregators," Working Papers 2015/11, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    18. Grant Miller & A. Mushfiq Mobarak, 2015. "Learning About New Technologies Through Social Networks: Experimental Evidence on Nontraditional Stoves in Bangladesh," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 480-499, July.
    19. Yi Zhao & Jegoo Lee, 2023. "How does board interlock network matter for sustainability? A social learning approach to corporate environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5889-5908, December.
    20. Leonardo Bursztyn & Florian Ederer & Bruno Ferman & Noam Yuchtman, 2012. "Understanding Peer Effects in Financial Decisions: Evidence from a Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 18241, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8281-:d:1484084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.