IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7556-d1468574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pro-Ecological Consumer Behavior versus Energy Reduction and Sustainable Consumption: A Case from Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Wyrzykowska

    (Institute of Management, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166 St., 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Artur Czech

    (Faculty of Management and Technical Sciences, Warsaw Management University, Kawęczyńska 36 St., 03-772 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Dąbrowska

    (Institute of Management, Warsaw School of Economics, Niepodległości 162 St., 02-544 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Rytko

    (Institute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166 St., 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The concepts of sustainable consumption and production increased in popularity after the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in 2002. Moreover, the focus of attention was turned to the consumer and their key importance in achieving the goals of more sustainable practices. Hence, the main aim of this article is to present the influence of factors related to pro-ecological consumer behaviors on sustainable consumption including energy-use reduction. Epsilon regression was implemented as the research method. This statistical tool enabled the authors to carry out research on such complex phenomena and make the analysis immune to the high correlation among explanatory variables. Moreover, it allowed the authors to consider interactions in the set of diagnostic variables. The research presented in this paper is based on data drawn from the Barometer of Consumer Social Responsibility in Poland for 2022. As the final result of this research, a ranking of pro-ecological consumer behavior factors was constructed. On the one hand, not buying products using excessive packaging can be considered the most important factor of Polish pro-ecological consumer behaviors. On the other hand, trying to choose more ecological products with comparable prices can be regarded as the factor which has the smallest impact. Furthermore, the presented method also allowed for determining the contribution of individual factors to the pro-ecological behavior of consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Wyrzykowska & Artur Czech & Anna Dąbrowska & Anna Rytko, 2024. "Pro-Ecological Consumer Behavior versus Energy Reduction and Sustainable Consumption: A Case from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7556-:d:1468574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7556/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7556/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivan Diaz‐Rainey & John K. Ashton, 2011. "Profiling potential green electricity tariff adopters: green consumerism as an environmental policy tool?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 456-470, November.
    2. Peter Ansu-Mensah, 2021. "Green product awareness effect on green purchase intentions of university students’: an emerging market’s perspective," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Heesup Han, 2020. "Theory of green purchase behavior (TGPB): A new theory for sustainable consumption of green hotel and green restaurant products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2815-2828, September.
    4. Ian H. Rowlands & Daniel Scott & Paul Parker, 2003. "Consumers and green electricity: profiling potential purchasers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 36-48, January.
    5. Abdulkarim Hasan Rashed & Afzal Shah, 2021. "The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2931-2948, March.
    6. Kumju Hwang & Hyewon Kim, 2018. "Are Ethical Consumers Happy? Effects of Ethical Consumers' Motivations Based on Empathy Versus Self-orientation on Their Happiness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 579-598, August.
    7. Artur Czech & Jerzy Lewczuk & Leonas Ustinovichius & Robertas Kontrimovičius, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Assessment of Transport Sustainability in Chosen European Union Countries: A Dynamic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Sapna A. Narula & Anupriya Desore, 2016. "Framing green consumer behaviour research: opportunities and challenges," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Wiser, Ryan H., 2007. "Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3-4), pages 419-432, May.
    10. Richard Johnson, 1966. "The minimal transformation to orthonormality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(1), pages 61-66, March.
    11. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. & Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Bohlen, Greg M., 2003. "Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 465-480, June.
    12. Shigeru Matsumoto & Kenichi Mizobuchi & Shunsuke Managi, 2022. "Household energy consumption," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(1), pages 1-5, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edyta Ropuszyńska-Surma & Magdalena Węglarz & Janusz Szwabiński, 2018. "Energy prosumers. Profiling the energy microgeneration market in Lower Silesia, Poland," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 28(1), pages 75-94.
    2. Alsulami, Abdulkarim & Fairbrass, Jenny & Botelho, Tiago & Assadinia, Shahin, 2024. "Renewable energy and innovation in Saudi Arabia: An exploration of factors affecting consumers' intention to adopt Solar PV," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Tabi, Andrea & Hille, Stefanie Lena & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2014. "What makes people seal the green power deal? — Customer segmentation based on choice experiment in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 206-215.
    4. Edyta Ropuszyńska-Surma & Magdalena Węglarz, 2018. "Profiling End User of Renewable Energy Sources among Residential Consumers in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Andreas Niedermeier & Agnes Emberger‐Klein & Klaus Menrad, 2021. "Which factors distinguish the different consumer segments of green fast‐moving consumer goods in Germany?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1823-1838, May.
    6. Garces-Voisenat, Juan-Pedro & Mukherjee, Zinnia, 2016. "Paying for green energy: The case of the Chilean Patagonia," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 397-414.
    7. Herbes, Carsten & Ramme, Iris, 2014. "Online marketing of green electricity in Germany—A content analysis of providers’ websites," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 257-266.
    8. Johan Jansson, 2011. "Consumer eco‐innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 192-210, March.
    9. F. Testa & F. Iraldo & A Vaccari & E. Ferrari, 2015. "Why Eco‐labels can be Effective Marketing Tools: Evidence from a Study on Italian Consumers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 252-265, May.
    10. Taale, Francis & Kyeremeh, Christian, 2016. "Households׳ willingness to pay for reliable electricity services in Ghana," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 280-288.
    11. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska, 2019. "Do Consumers Want to Pay for Green Electricity? A Case Study from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Ma, Chunbo & Burton, Michael, 2016. "Warm glow from green power: Evidence from Australian electricity consumers," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 106-120.
    13. Ivan Diaz‐Rainey & John K. Ashton, 2011. "Profiling potential green electricity tariff adopters: green consumerism as an environmental policy tool?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 456-470, November.
    14. Chiambaretto, Paul & Laurent, Sara & Schmalz, Ulrike & Fu, Mengying & Rouyre, Audrey & Bildstein, Camille & Fernandez, Anne-Sophie, 2024. "Are consumers willing to pay more for green innovations? Insights from the air transport industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Neringa Vilkaite-Vaitone & Vilma Tamuliene, 2023. "Unveiling the Untapped Potential of Green Consumption in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Ritsuko Ozaki, 2011. "Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Chankrajang, Thanyaporn & Muttarak, Raya, 2017. "Green Returns to Education: Does Schooling Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviours? Evidence from Thailand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 434-448.
    18. Herrmann, J.K. & Savin, I., 2017. "Optimal policy identification: Insights from the German electricity market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 71-90.
    19. Abida Begum & Liu Jingwei & Maqsood Haider & Muhammad Maroof Ajmal & Salim Khan & Heesup Han, 2021. "Impact of Environmental Moral Education on Pro-Environmental Behaviour: Do Psychological Empowerment and Islamic Religiosity Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Pleeging, Emma & van Exel, Job & Burger, Martijn J. & Stavropoulos, Spyridon, 2021. "Hope for the future and willingness to pay for sustainable energy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7556-:d:1468574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.