IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6232-d1439786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systems Engineering Approach to Decarbonizing Mining: Analyzing Electrification and CO 2 Emission Reduction Scenarios for Copper Mining Haulage Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Kemalcan Aydogdu

    (Department of Mining Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

  • Sebnem Duzgun

    (Department of Mining Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

  • Evren Deniz Yaylaci

    (SysEne Consulting Inc., Vancouver, BC V6C 0A6, Canada)

  • Fatih Aranoglu

    (Department of Mining Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

Abstract

Due to climate change risks, the public, regulators, and investors require solid actions to minimize the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of mineral extraction and metals production. The mining sector considers alternatives to reduce its carbon footprint by transforming the business and adopting new technologies into operations. Given the capital intensity, technical characteristics, and business structure involved, a shift in the mining industry necessitates impartial insights into the trade-offs and risks. Considering the low-carbon transition trade-offs and risks in mining, this study presents the application of system dynamics modeling (SDM) in mining projects to analyze the impact of decarbonization alternatives with respect to carbon footprint and costs. A system dynamics model of an open-pit copper mine is developed to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as well as capital and operational costs, during the project life cycle. The change in GHG emissions in the business-as-usual scenario with diesel equipment haulage versus the alternative scenario with electric overland conveyor haulage is compared concerning GHG emissions and associated costs. The results unequivocally demonstrated that electrifying material mobility offers significant decarbonization in open-pit mining if the on-site electricity has a low emission factor. The findings also indicate that the substantial cost difference between electrification and diesel alternatives is another major obstacle to implementing electrification in an open-pit copper mine. This research proves that implementing SDM in the mining industry can offer impartial insights into decision-making and enable a thorough evaluation of options using quantitative criteria. It effectively assesses and communicates the trade-offs and risks of transitioning to low-carbon alternatives because it analyzes project variables quantitatively and holistically and is easy to run.

Suggested Citation

  • Kemalcan Aydogdu & Sebnem Duzgun & Evren Deniz Yaylaci & Fatih Aranoglu, 2024. "A Systems Engineering Approach to Decarbonizing Mining: Analyzing Electrification and CO 2 Emission Reduction Scenarios for Copper Mining Haulage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6232-:d:1439786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ansari, Nastaran & Seifi, Abbas, 2013. "A system dynamics model for analyzing energy consumption and CO2 emission in Iranian cement industry under various production and export scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 75-89.
    2. Li, Jingjing & Nian, Victor & Jiao, Jianling, 2022. "Diffusion and benefits evaluation of electric vehicles under policy interventions based on a multiagent system dynamics model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    3. Dehghan, Hamed & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Nahavandi, Nasim, 2021. "A system dynamics model to analyze future electricity supply and demand in Iran under alternative pricing policies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Fatih Aranoglu & Tulay Flamand & Sebnem Duzgun, 2022. "Analysis of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Peru under Climate Impacts Using System Dynamics Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Datola, Giulia & Bottero, Marta & De Angelis, Elena & Romagnoli, Francesco, 2022. "Operationalising resilience: A methodological framework for assessing urban resilience through System Dynamics Model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    6. Li, Qiang & Zhang, Wenjuan & Li, Huiquan & He, Peng, 2017. "CO2 emission trends of China's primary aluminum industry: A scenario analysis using system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 225-235.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akhil Kunche & Bożena Mielczarek, 2021. "Application of System Dynamic Modelling for Evaluation of Carbon Mitigation Strategies in Cement Industries: A Comparative Overview of the Current State of the Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Dehghan, Hamed & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Nahavandi, Nasim, 2021. "A system dynamics model to analyze future electricity supply and demand in Iran under alternative pricing policies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Chenran Jia & Can Ding & Wenhui Chen, 2023. "Research on the Diffusion Model of Electric Vehicle Quantity Considering Individual Choice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Liying Cui & Min Peng & Hengshuo Zhang & Liwei Cui, 2025. "Analysis of the Dynamic System Driving High-Quality Transformation of Resource-Based Regions Through Smart Eco-Innovation: Evidence from Daqing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Ying Zhang & Yunyan Li, 2024. "A Study on the Coupling Coordination of Urban Resilience and the Tourism Economy in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Yingyi Huang & Yuliya Mamatok & Chun Jin, 2021. "Decision-making instruments for container seaport sustainable development: management platform and system dynamics model," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 212-226, June.
    7. Akhil Kunche & Bożena Mielczarek, 2021. "Application of System Dynamic Modelling for Evaluation of CO 2 Emissions and Expenditure for Captive Power Generation Scenarios in the Cement Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Song, Huiling & Wang, Chang & Sun, Kun & Geng, Hongjun & Zuo, Lyushui, 2023. "Material efficiency strategies across the industrial chain to secure indium availability for global carbon neutrality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    9. Junxiao Wei & Kuang Cen, 2019. "A preliminary calculation of cement carbon dioxide in China from 1949 to 2050," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 1343-1362, December.
    10. Martínez-Hernández, Alberto Gabino, 2022. "System Dynamics Modelling and Climate Change Adaptation in Coastal Areas: A Literature Review," FEEM Working Papers 322836, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    11. Md Hasan Maruf & Sameya Afrin July & Mamun Rabbani & Shafrida Sahrani & Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu & Mahidur R. Sarker & Ratil H. Ashique & Md. Shahrial Kabir & A. S. M. Shihavuddin, 2023. "Energy and Exergy-Based Efficiency, Sustainability and Economic Assessment towards Improved Energy Management of a Thermal Power Plant: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Mangla, Sachin Kumar, 2024. "Analysing of the territorial competitiveness index in Izmir through dynamic model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Soares, Ana Jacinta & Tosato, Giorgio, 2024. "An urban system mathematical approach with human factor: The case of pedestrianization in a consolidated area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 489(C).
    14. Wang, Yitong & Fan, Ruguo & Chen, Rongkai & Xie, Xiao & Ke, Can, 2025. "Exploring the coevolution dynamics of residents and recyclers in electric vehicle battery recycling decisions on the two-layer heterogeneous complex networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    15. Dehghan, Hamed & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza, 2022. "A simulation-based optimization model to determine optimal electricity prices under various scenarios considering stakeholders’ objectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    16. Tang, Lei & Guo, Jue & Zhao, Boyang & Wang, Xiuli & Shao, Chengcheng & Wang, Yifei, 2021. "Power generation mix evolution based on rolling horizon optimal approach: A system dynamics analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    17. Shen, Yung-Shuen & Huang, Guan-Ting & Chang-Chien, Chien-Li & Huang, Lance Hongwei & Kuo, Chien-Hung & Hu, Allen H., 2023. "The impact of passenger electric vehicles on carbon reduction and environmental impact under the 2050 net zero policy in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Shen, Angxing & Zhang, Jihong, 2024. "Technologies for CO2 emission reduction and low-carbon development in primary aluminum industry in China: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    19. Li, Yun & Yue, Qiang & He, Junhao & Zhao, Feng & Wang, Heming, 2020. "When will the arrival of China's secondary aluminum era?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    20. Liu, Donghui & Gao, Xiangyun & An, Haizhong & Qi, Yabin & Wang, Ze & Jia, Nanfei & Chen, Zhihua, 2020. "Exploring behavior changes of the lithium market in China: Toward technology-oriented future scenarios," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6232-:d:1439786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.