IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5327-d1420326.html

How Low-Code Tools Contribute to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the Workplace: A Case Study of a Large Japanese Corporation

Author

Listed:
  • Natsumi Takahashi

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi 923-1292, Ishikawa, Japan
    Hitachi, Ltd., Nippon Seimei Marunouchi Bldg., 1-6-6, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8280, Japan)

  • Amna Javed

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi 923-1292, Ishikawa, Japan)

  • Youji Kohda

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi 923-1292, Ishikawa, Japan)

Abstract

Learning and using technology in the workplace are essential for a company’s commitment to the sustainable development of its resources. Finding competent engineers who can handle information communication technologies (ICTs) is a challenge for companies. Currently, however, the ability to use these technologies is limited to technicians with specialized training, and not everyone can engage in development. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that equity in the use of technology has not yet been realized. This study aims to analyze, based on actual cases, the necessary conditions and mechanisms for people with diverse experiences and circumstances, not limited to engineers, to participate in ICT development to address human resource diversity. The use of technology such as low-code platforms (LCPs) that have recently emerged on the market has shown that nonprofessional engineers without programming training can participate in development projects. This research will be useful to managers in advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) strategies in their workplaces and contribute to organizational research regarding new trends in technology use by individuals: low codability. The findings of this study are of significant relevance to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of decent work and economic growth, as well as gender equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Natsumi Takahashi & Amna Javed & Youji Kohda, 2024. "How Low-Code Tools Contribute to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the Workplace: A Case Study of a Large Japanese Corporation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5327-:d:1420326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shalini Garg & Snehlata Sangwan, 2021. "Literature Review on Diversity and Inclusion at Workplace, 2010–2017," Vision, , vol. 25(1), pages 12-22, March.
    2. Zeynep Arsel & David Crockett & Maura L Scott, 2022. "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the Journal of Consumer Research: A Curation and Research Agenda [When Feeling Younger Depends on Others: The Effects of Social Cues on Older Consumers]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(5), pages 920-933.
    3. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martina Košíková & Petra Vašaničová, 2025. "Exploring the Link Between Digital Readiness and Sustainable Development: A Cluster Analysis of EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renata Frota & Elisa Priori de Deus & Victor Almeida & Leticia Moreira Casotti, 2023. "Clubinho Preto: Children Growing Up with Racial Diversity," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 27(Vol. 27 N), pages 220269-2202.
    2. Zara Contractor & Germ'an Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," Papers 2508.00717, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    3. Christoph Riedl & Eric Bogert, 2024. "Who Benefits from AI? Self-Selection, Skill Gap, and the Hidden Costs of AI Feedback," Papers 2409.18660, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    4. Carvajal, Daniel & Franco, Catalina & Isaksson, Siri, 2024. "Will Artificial Intelligence Get in the Way of Achieving Gender Equality?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 3/2024, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics, revised 28 Apr 2025.
    5. Riccardo Zanardelli, 2025. "Navigating the safe harbor paradox in human-machine systems," Papers 2509.14057, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    6. Francesco Venturini, 2025. "Generative AI and Income Growth: Early Evidence on Global Data," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 31-46.
    7. Giampaolo Bonomi, 2026. "The Division of Understanding: Specialization and Democratic Accountability," Papers 2604.09871, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    8. Musa Essa, 2023. "Diversity from the customer's perspective: Good or bad? The case of disability," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(1), pages 81-98, March.
    9. Leonardo Gambacorta & Enisse Kharroubi & Aaron Mehrotra & Livia Pancotto, 2026. "Economic impact of AI in emerging market economies," BIS Bulletins 121, Bank for International Settlements.
    10. Standaert, Thomas & Andries, Petra, 2026. "Overcoming difficulties in knowledge transfer: Harnessing the power of AI to drive process innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Andrew Johnston & Christos A. Makridis, 2026. "AI, Output, and Employment," CESifo Working Paper Series 12579, CESifo.
    12. Lilia Patrignani, 2024. "Understanding digital trade," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 841, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    13. David Rothschild, 2025. "Comment on "The Coasean Singularity? Demand, Supply, and Market Design with AI Agents"," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Transformative AI, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Feiyang Xu & Poonacha K. Medappa & Murat M. Tunc & Martijn Vroegindeweij & Jan C. Fransoo, 2025. "AI-Assisted Programming Decreases the Productivity of Experienced Developers by Increasing the Technical Debt and Maintenance Burden," Papers 2510.10165, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    15. Amali Matharaarachchi & Wishmitha Mendis & Kanishka Randunu & Daswin De Silva & Gihan Gamage & Harsha Moraliyage & Nishan Mills & Andrew Jennings, 2024. "Optimizing Generative AI Chatbots for Net-Zero Emissions Energy Internet-of-Things Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Sonya A Grier & David Crockett & Guillaume D Johnson & Kevin D Thomas & Tonya Williams Bradford, 2024. "Race in consumer research: past, present and future," Post-Print hal-04200003, HAL.
    17. Andreas D. Landmark & Johan E. Ravn & Hans Y. Torvatn & Lisbeth Øyum, 2024. "Digital Transformations Through the Lens of the Collaborative, Co-Generative and Domesticative," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 537-548, October.
    18. Martin Baily & David Byrne & Aidan Kane & Paul Soto, 2025. "Generative AI at the Crossroads: Light Bulb, Dynamo, or Microscope?," Papers 2505.14588, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    19. Yukun Zhang & Tianyang Zhang, 2026. "Generative AI as a Non-Convex Supply Shock: Market Bifurcation and Welfare Analysis," Papers 2601.12488, arXiv.org.
    20. Leonardo Gambacorta & Han Qiu & Shuo Shan & Daniel M Rees, 2024. "Generative AI and labour productivity: a field experiment on coding," BIS Working Papers 1208, Bank for International Settlements.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5327-:d:1420326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.