IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4357-d1399169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-Conscious Consumption in the Climate Change Era: Decoding the Mediating Role of Food Safety and Environmental Concerns between Health Literacy and Take-Out Food Consumption in China

Author

Listed:
  • Liming Lin

    (School of Internet Economics and Business, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350014, China)

  • Xiaosan Zhang

    (Research Center for Belt and Road Financial and Economic Development, Xiamen National Accounting Institute, Xiamen 361000, China)

  • Muhammad Anwar Khan

    (Quality Assurance Directorate, Bahria University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Awais Mehmood

    (Business Studies Department, Bahria Business School, Bahria University, Islamabad Campus, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Kamran Khan

    (Management Studies Department, Bahria Business School, Bahria University, Islamabad Campus, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

Abstract

With take-out food consumption rapidly increasing in China, understanding the factors influencing this dietary shift is crucial for public health, food security, and the environment. This study explores the role of health literacy in take-out food consumption, considering the mediating effects of food safety and environmental concerns and the moderating effect of perceived behavioral control. Cross-sectional survey data from 526 respondents were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and regression to assess the relationships between health literacy, food safety concern, environmental concern, perceived behavioral control, and take-out food consumption frequency. The results revealed that health literacy is negatively associated with consumers’ take-out food consumption frequency; this relationship is completely mediated by food safety and environmental concerns. Furthermore, perceived behavioral control was found to strengthen the impact of food safety and environmental concerns on take-out food consumption frequency. This research advances the interdisciplinary understanding of health literacy’s impact on take-out food consumption by identifying its negative correlation and the mediating roles of food safety concern and environmental concern, with perceived behavioral control intensifying this relationship. Practical implications include the development of public health campaigns and food delivery platforms to strengthen supervision, and digital tools to empower consumers to make informed dietary choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Liming Lin & Xiaosan Zhang & Muhammad Anwar Khan & Muhammad Awais Mehmood & Muhammad Kamran Khan, 2024. "Eco-Conscious Consumption in the Climate Change Era: Decoding the Mediating Role of Food Safety and Environmental Concerns between Health Literacy and Take-Out Food Consumption in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4357-:d:1399169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michal Carrington & Benjamin Neville & Gregory Whitwell, 2010. "Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 139-158, November.
    2. Grunert, Klaus G. & Hieke, Sophie & Wills, Josephine, 2014. "Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 177-189.
    3. Jawad Iqbal & Donglei Yu & Maria Zubair & Muhammad Imran Rasheed & Hafiz Muhammad Usman Khizar & Muhammad Imran, 2021. "Health Consciousness, Food Safety Concern, and Consumer Purchase Intentions Toward Organic Food: The Role of Consumer Involvement and Ecological Motives," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carla Rossi & Francesca Rivetti, 2020. "Assessing Young Consumers’ Responses to Sustainable Labels: Insights from a Factorial Experiment in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Malin Jonell & Beatrice Crona & Kelsey Brown & Patrik Rönnbäck & Max Troell, 2016. "Eco-Labeled Seafood: Determinants for (Blue) Green Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Nadine E. van der Waal & Frans Folkvord & Rachid Azrout & Corine S. Meppelink, 2022. "Can Product Information Steer towards Sustainable and Healthy Food Choices? A Pilot Study in an Online Supermarket," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Carlo Genova & Tommaso Tonet, 2025. "Sustainable Food Purchasing in an Urban Context: Retail Availability and Consumers’ Representations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Rebecca Boehm & Hannah Kitchel & Selena Ahmed & Anaya Hall & Colin M. Orians & John Richard Stepp & Al Robbat, Jr. & Timothy S. Griffin & Sean B. Cash, 2019. "Is Agricultural Emissions Mitigation on the Menu for Tea Drinkers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Sun, Yuting & Zhang, Jianting & Li, Yixuan, 2024. "Realisation that online advertisements are misleading: Involvement of middle-aged and older adults with botanical dietary supplements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Robert Mai & Stefan Hoffmann & Ingo Balderjahn, 2021. "When drivers become inhibitors of organic consumption: the need for a multistage view," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1151-1174, November.
    8. Kjersti Nes & Federico Antonioli & Pavel Ciaian, 2024. "Trends in sustainability claims and labels for newly introduced food products across selected European countries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 371-390, April.
    9. Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Damian Kocot, 2022. "Determinants of Purchase Behavior of Young E-Consumers of Eco-Friendly Products to Further Sustainable Consumption Based on Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Morais, Ana Catarina & Ishida, Akira & Matsuda, Ruriko, 2024. "Ethical food consumption drivers in Japan. A S–O-R framework application using PLS-SEM with a MGA assessment based on clustering," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Yan, Min & Filieri, Raffaele & Gorton, Matthew, 2021. "Continuance intention of online technologies: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Katja H. Brunk & Cara Boer, 2020. "How do Consumers Reconcile Positive and Negative CSR-Related Information to Form an Ethical Brand Perception? A Mixed Method Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 443-458, January.
    13. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Climate-Friendly Food in European Countries," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276930, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. Valentina Carfora & Patrizia Catellani, 2022. "Advertising Innovative Sustainable Fashion: Informational, Transformational, or Sustainability Appeal?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Zou, Lili Wenli & Chan, Ricky Y.K., 2019. "Why and when do consumers perform green behaviors? An examination of regulatory focus and ethical ideology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 113-127.
    16. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    17. Antonino Galati & Giuseppina Migliore & Alkis Thrassou & Giorgio Schifani & Giuseppina Rizzo & Nino Adamashvili & Maria Crescimanno, 2023. "Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Agri-Food Products Delivered with Electric Vehicles in the Short Supply Chains," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 12(2), pages 193-207, June.
    18. Hempel, Corinna & Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2022. "The Gap between Citizens’ Concerns and Consumers’ Actions: Which Factors Impair the Adoption of Food-related Mitigation Options?," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(01), January.
    19. Coralie Hellwig & Kim Bolton & Greta Häggblom-Kronlöf & Kamran Rousta, 2022. "Aspects Affecting Food Choice in Daily Life as Well as Drivers and Barriers to Engagement with Fungi-Based Food—A Qualitative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Tiia-Lotta Pekkanen, 2021. "Institutions and Agency in the Sustainability of Day-to-Day Consumption Practices: An Institutional Ethnographic Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 241-260, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4357-:d:1399169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.