IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4187-d1080565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

DTMethod: A New Evidence-Based Design Thinking Methodology for Effective Teamwork

Author

Listed:
  • Karolina Dukala

    (Faculty of Psychology in Katowice, SWPS University, 03-815 Warszawa, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Joanna Pyrkosz-Pacyna

    (Faculty of Humanities, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Rafał Czarny

    (Inprogress, 31-351 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Design thinking (DT) emerged as a popular method of problem solving and idea generation in creative teams. However, despite the rapid increase in interest in DT as a practical tool, evidence for its effectiveness is rather scarce. Furthermore, neither the theory underlying the methods used in DT nor the definition of DT is coherent. As such, we have decided to introduce a new approach to DT by designing an evidence-based methodology and testing its efficacy among teams working on a specific task. In this article, we present the design thinking method (DTMethod), developed by an interdisciplinary team of practitioners and academics. We also present empirical evidence on the effectiveness of the DTMethod in the teamwork setting. In our study of 39 teams, we found that by using the DTMethod teams achieved more favorable results in terms of utility and meeting set requirements but not in terms of cost or time efficiency. We also found that individuals working according to the DTMethod reported experiencing less positive emotional states but were, overall, more satisfied with the experience and rated teamwork more favorably in terms of cohesiveness and team effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolina Dukala & Joanna Pyrkosz-Pacyna & Rafał Czarny, 2023. "DTMethod: A New Evidence-Based Design Thinking Methodology for Effective Teamwork," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4187-:d:1080565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neeraj Sonalkar & Ade Mabogunje & Gina Pai & Aparna Krishnan & Bernard Roth, 2016. "Diagnostics for Design Thinking Teams," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, pages 35-51, Springer.
    2. Philipp Skogstad & Larry Leifer, 2011. "A Unified Innovation Process Model for Engineering Designers and Managers," Understanding Innovation, in: Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer & Hasso Plattner (ed.), Design Thinking, pages 19-43, Springer.
    3. Martin Hoegl & Hans Georg Gemuenden, 2001. "Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 435-449, August.
    4. Steven P. Dow & Alana Glassco & Jonathan Kass & Melissa Schwarz & Daniel L. Schwartz & Scott R. Klemmer, 2012. "Parallel Prototyping Leads to Better Design Results, More Divergence, and Increased Self-efficacy," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, edition 127, pages 127-153, Springer.
    5. Jan Schmiedgen & Lea Spille & Eva Köppen & Holger Rhinow & Christoph Meinel, 2016. "Measuring the Impact of Design Thinking," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, pages 157-170, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Englmaier, Florian & Grimm, Stefan & Schindler, David & Schudy, Simeon, 2018. "The Effect of Incentives in Non-Routine Analytical Team Tasks – Evidence from a Field Experiment," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168286, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    3. Amélie Thery & Michel Verstraeten, 2018. "Highlighting the Relations between Interaction Types in Meetings and Group Performance," Working Papers CEB 18-011, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Seongkyoon Jeong & Jae Young Choi, 2012. "The taxonomy of research collaboration in science and technology: evidence from mechanical research through probabilistic clustering analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 719-735, June.
    5. Peerasit Patanakul & Zvi Aronson, 2012. "Managing a Group of Multiple Projects: Do Culture and Leader’s Competencies Matter?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 3(2), pages 217-232, June.
    6. Blindenbach-Driessen, Floortje & van den Ende, Jan, 2006. "Innovation in project-based firms: The context dependency of success factors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 545-561, May.
    7. Bart A. De Jong & Katinka M. Bijlsma-Frankema & Laura B. Cardinal, 2014. "Stronger Than the Sum of Its Parts? The Performance Implications of Peer Control Combinations in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1703-1721, December.
    8. Youkyung Ko & Hwaneui Lee & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2021. "Airline Cabin Crew Team System’s Positive Evaluation Factors and Their Impact on Personal Health and Team Potency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Monika Tkacz & Izaskun Agirre-Aramburu & Aitor Lizartza-Martin, 2023. "Is Team Entrepreneurial Orientation important in generating creative business ideas? The moderating role of team-perceived heterogeneity and the individual creative mindset," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 19(1), pages 79-111.
    10. Wang, Liwen & Zhao, Jane Zheng & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2018. "How do incentives motivate absorptive capacity development? The mediating role of employee learning and relational contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 226-237.
    11. Daniel Tzabbar & Alex Vestal, 2015. "Bridging the Social Chasm in Geographically Distributed R&D Teams: The Moderating Effects of Relational Strength and Status Asymmetry on the Novelty of Team Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 811-829, June.
    12. Edoardo Mollona & Andrea Marcozzi, 2009. "FirmNet: the scope of firms and the allocation of task in a knowledge-based economy," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 109-126, June.
    13. Maqbool, Rashid, 2018. "Efficiency and effectiveness of factors affecting renewable energy projects; an empirical perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 944-956.
    14. Xinya You, 2022. "Applying design thinking for business model innovation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Shoeb Ahmed Memon & Steve Rowlinson & Riza Yosia Sunindijo & Hafiz Zahoor, 2021. "Collaborative Behavior in Relational Contracting Projects in Hong Kong—A Contractor’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Horn, Philipp & Scheffler, Paul & Schiele, Holger, 2014. "Internal integration as a pre-condition for external integration in global sourcing: A social capital perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 54-65.
    17. Haberstroh, Martin & Wolf, Joachim, 2005. "Individuelle Autonomie in Projektteams," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 585, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    18. Musab Isik & Kursad Timuroglu & Yussuf Aliyev, 2015. "The Relationship between Teamwork and Organizational Trust:Relations Between Cognitive, Affective and Action Loyalty," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 4(1), pages 113-132, January.
    19. Rob Kim Marjerison & Matthew Andrews & George Kuan, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Organizations through Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Agility: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Křečková, J. & Rydval, J. & Brožová, H. & Hornická, A., 2017. "Selection of Communication Routes in Agriculture Equipment Company," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4187-:d:1080565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.