IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4103-d1078707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Tourism Industry Performance through Support System Facilities and Stakeholders: The Role of Environmental Dynamism

Author

Listed:
  • Fandi Achmad

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Yudha Prambudia

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Augustina Asih Rumanti

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

Abstract

Success in improving the tourism industry’s performance depends on support system facilities and the role of stakeholders. However, the role of stakeholders in increasing tourism potential to support tourism industry activities, especially in a dynamic environment, still needs further elucidation. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to identify the factors that influence the improvement of the tourism industry and to produce strategies for the tourism industry. In this study, we conducted empirical research that elaborated the impact of support system facilities, stakeholders, and environmental dynamism on how the tourism industry achieves optimal performance in environmental dynamism. Support system facilities factors include telecommunication, power sources, transportation, waste management, location, clean water sources, supporting industries, spatial factors, hospitality, safety, and security. This research was based on data from 203 respondents from SMEs located around the tourist area of Rembang Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. This research shows that the tourism industry in Rembang Regency can achieve optimal performance by utilizing and improving spatial factors, clean water sources, and telecommunication. Therefore, stakeholders and SMEs will benefit from support system facilities that can improve their performance in a dynamic tourism industry environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Fandi Achmad & Yudha Prambudia & Augustina Asih Rumanti, 2023. "Improving Tourism Industry Performance through Support System Facilities and Stakeholders: The Role of Environmental Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4103-:d:1078707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nora Zulvianti & Hasdi Aimon & Abror Abror, 2022. "The Influence of Environmental and Non-Environmental Factors on Tourist Satisfaction in Halal Tourism Destinations in West Sumatra, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Aan Jaelani, 2017. "Halal Tourism Industry in Indonesia: Potential and Prospects," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 25-34.
    3. José María Martín Martín & Jose Manuel Guaita Martínez & José Antonio Salinas Fernández, 2018. "An Analysis of the Factors behind the Citizen’s Attitude of Rejection towards Tourism in a Context of Overtourism and Economic Dependence on This Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Justin J. P. Jansen & Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2006. "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1661-1674, November.
    5. Sotirios Varelas & Panagiota Karvela & Nikolaos Georgopoulos, 2021. "The Impact of Information Technology and Sustainable Strategies in Hotel Branding, Evidence from the Greek Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Manuel Rodríguez Díaz & Tomás F. Espino Rodríguez, 2016. "Determining the Sustainability Factors and Performance of a Tourism Destination from the Stakeholders’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Ping Sun & Xiaoming Zhou & Cui Shao & Wenli Wang & Jinkun Sun, 2022. "The Impacts of Environmental Dynamism on Chinese Tour Guides’ Sustainable Performance: Factors Related to Vitality, Positive Stress Mindset and Supportive Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Popa, Simona & Soto-Acosta, Pedro & Martinez-Conesa, Isabel, 2017. "Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 134-142.
    9. Michał Roman & Monika Roman & Emilia Grzegorzewska & Piotr Pietrzak & Kamil Roman, 2022. "Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Tourism in European Countries: Cluster Analysis Findings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Heesup Han & Amr Al-Ansi & Bee-Lia Chua & Beenish Tariq & Aleksandar Radic & Su-hyun Park, 2020. "The Post-Coronavirus World in the International Tourism Industry: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Safer Destination Choices in the Case of US Outbound Tourism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Asnawi Manaf & Novia Purbasari & Maya Damayanti & Nanda Aprilia & Winny Astuti, 2018. "Community-Based Rural Tourism in Inter-Organizational Collaboration: How Does It Work Sustainably? Lessons Learned from Nglanggeran Tourism Village, Gunungkidul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Kim, Bora & Lee, Seoki, 2022. "The impact of celebrity CEOs on restaurant firm performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 869-880.
    13. Anca Băndoi & Elena Jianu & Maria Enescu & Gheorghe Axinte & Sorin Tudor & Daniela Firoiu, 2020. "The Relationship between Development of Tourism, Quality of Life and Sustainable Performance in EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Su Wang & Haihui Xie & Binwei Yun & Xincheng Pu & Zhi Qiu, 2024. "Optimization Strategy for the Spatiotemporal Layout of E-Bike Charging Piles from the Perspective of Sustainable Campus Planning: A Case Study of Zijingang Campus of Zhejiang University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Yixian Mo & Rongxiao He & Qing Liu & Yaoyao Zhao & Shuhai Zhuo & Peng Zhou, 2024. "Spatial Configuration and Accessibility Assessment of Recreational Resources in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Artamevia Salsabila Rizaldi & Augustina Asih Rumanti & Luciana Andrawina, 2024. "Sustainable Tourism Industry in Indonesia through Mapping Natural Tourism Potential: Taxonomy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-44, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barba-Aragón, María Isabel & Jiménez-Jiménez, Daniel, 2020. "HRM and radical innovation: A dual approach with exploration as a mediator," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 791-803.
    2. Lijie Feng & Zhenzhen Zhao & Jinfeng Wang & Ke Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Knowledge Management Capabilities on Innovation Performance from Dynamic Capabilities Perspective: Moderating the Role of Environmental Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Aslam, Muhammad Shakeel & Qammar, Ahmad & Ali, Imran & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar & Ahmed, Farhan & Mohapatra, Amiya Kumar, 2024. "Fostering innovation speed and quality in ICT firms: The role of knowledge governance mechanisms, absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Liu Liu & Hua Zhang, 2021. "How Does Inter-Organizational Relational Governance Propel Firms’ Open Innovation? A Conditional Process Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Gupta, Shivam & Busso, Donatella & Kamboj, Shampy, 2021. "Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 788-798.
    6. Avimanyu Datta, 2016. "Antecedents To Radical Innovations: A Longitudinal Look At Firms In The Information Technology Industry By Aggregation Of Patents," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    8. Rana Muhammad Shahid Yaqub & Aneeta Rehman & Shakeela Kausar & Zakariya Hassan Qureshi, 2022. "Insights from Theory of Reason Action to Determine the Faculty Turn-Over Intentions in HEI’s of Southern Punjab: Mediating and Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Justice and Organizational ," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(2), pages 375-389, june.
    9. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    10. Luc Beal & Hugues Séraphin & Giuseppe Modica & Manuela Pilato & Marco Platania, 2019. "Analysing the Mediating Effect of Heritage Between Locals and Visitors: An Exploratory Study Using Mission Patrimoine as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
    12. Marco Caliendo & Daniel Rodríguez, 2024. "Divergent thinking and post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes: non-linearities and the moderating role of experience," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1523-1553, April.
    13. Orsatti, Gianluca & Pezzoni, Michele & Quatraro, Francesco, 2017. "Where Do Green Technologies Come From? Inventor Teams’ Recombinant Capabilities and the Creation of New Knowledge," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201711, University of Turin.
    14. Varadarajan, Rajan & Kaul, Rupali, 2018. "Doing well by doing good innovations: alleviation of social problems in emerging markets through corporate social innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 225-233.
    15. Xin Liu & Lin Zhang & Abhinav Gupta & Xiaoming Zheng & Changqi Wu, 2022. "Upper echelons and intra‐organizational learning: How executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2351-2381, November.
    16. Guiyang Zhang, 2021. "Employee co-invention network dynamics and firm exploratory innovation: the moderation of employee co-invention network centralization and knowledge-employee network equilibrium," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7811-7836, September.
    17. Matsuno, Ken & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2020. "Proactive marketing response to population aging: The roles of capabilities and commitment of firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 93-104.
    18. Ye Jin Lee & Kwangsoo Shin & Eungdo Kim, 2019. "The Influence of a Firm’s Capability and Dyadic Relationship of the Knowledge Base on Ambidextrous Innovation in Biopharmaceutical M&As," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Aan Jaelani, 2017. "Halal Tourism Industry in Indonesia: Potential and Prospects," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 25-34.
    20. Fei Li & Jin Chen & Ying Ying, 2019. "Innovation Search Scope, Technological Complexity, and Environmental Turbulence: A N-K Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4103-:d:1078707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.