IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p9094-d1502849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Configuration and Accessibility Assessment of Recreational Resources in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park

Author

Listed:
  • Yixian Mo

    (College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Rongxiao He

    (College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Qing Liu

    (College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Yaoyao Zhao

    (College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Shuhai Zhuo

    (College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Peng Zhou

    (College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

Abstract

Recreational resources, fundamental to ecological experiences, are critical in balancing conservation with development. Effective ecotourism planning is especially vital for newly established protected areas such as the Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park in China’s developing system of natural conservation areas. Targeting Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park, this study applies nearest neighbor index, kernel density analysis, and exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) to study the spatial pattern of 274 recreational resource points. Results indicate a clustered spatial pattern with significant differences in resource density among municipalities. Specifically, 98% of these resources can be reached in 3 h, with an average travel time of 91 min, and cultural resources exhibit greater accessibility than natural resources. Natural resource availability and ethnic culture are major factors of resource distribution and accessibility. This research offers a theoretical basis and practical guidance for optimizing recreational resource allocation and promoting ecotourism in the park, contributing to the ongoing discussion of sustainable tourism development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yixian Mo & Rongxiao He & Qing Liu & Yaoyao Zhao & Shuhai Zhuo & Peng Zhou, 2024. "Spatial Configuration and Accessibility Assessment of Recreational Resources in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9094-:d:1502849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Musrat Gul Bhellar & Gopal Das & Haris Shaikh & Basel Sultan, 2023. "GIS-Based Sustainable Accessibility Mapping of Urban Parks: Evidence from the Second Largest Settlement of Sindh, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Xinyang Wu & Chuying Chen, 2022. "Spatial Distribution and Accessibility of High Level Scenic Spots in Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Fandi Achmad & Yudha Prambudia & Augustina Asih Rumanti, 2023. "Improving Tourism Industry Performance through Support System Facilities and Stakeholders: The Role of Environmental Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Mavoa, Suzanne & Witten, Karen & McCreanor, Tim & O’Sullivan, David, 2012. "GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 15-22.
    5. Yuehong Long & Jianxin Qin & Yang Wu & Ke Wang, 2023. "Analysis of Urban Park Accessibility Based on Space Syntax: Take the Urban Area of Changsha City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Xiao, Xiao & Aultman-Hall, Lisa & Manning, Robert & Voigt, Brian, 2018. "The impact of spatial accessibility and perceived barriers on visitation to the US national park system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 205-214.
    7. Dan Yuan & Runhan Wu & Dong Li & Lei Zhu & Yaguang Pan, 2023. "Spatial Patterns Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultural Resources in the Yellow River National Cultural Park, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhipeng Xing & Sidong Zhao & Kerun Li, 2023. "Evolution Pattern and Spatial Mismatch of Urban Greenspace and Its Impact Mechanism: Evidence from Parkland of Hunan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-31, November.
    2. Xiaosi Zhang & Jizhong Shao, 2024. "Evaluation of the Suitability of Street Vending Planning in Urban Public Space in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Chen, Shaopei & Claramunt, Christophe & Ray, Cyril, 2014. "A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 12-23.
    4. Lissy La Paix & Karst Geurs, 2015. "Scenarios for measuring station-based impedances in a national transport model," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1310, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Kaplan, Sigal & Popoks, Dmitrijs & Prato, Carlo Giacomo & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2014. "Using connectivity for measuring equity in transit provision," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 82-92.
    6. Xiaodong Zhang & Haoying Han & Yongjun Tang & Zhilu Chen, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Tourism Resources in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Aaron Golub & Glenn Robinson & Brendan Nee Brendan Nee, 2013. "Making accessibility analyses accessible: A tool to facilitate the public review of the effects of regional transportation plans on accessibility," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(3), pages 17-28.
    8. Jing Luo & Guangping Chen & Chang Li & Bingyan Xia & Xuan Sun & Siyun Chen, 2018. "Use of an E2SFCA Method to Measure and Analyse Spatial Accessibility to Medical Services for Elderly People in Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Dewulf, Bart & Neutens, Tijs & Vanlommel, Mario & Logghe, Steven & De Maeyer, Philippe & Witlox, Frank & De Weerdt, Yves & Van de Weghe, Nico, 2015. "Examining commuting patterns using Floating Car Data and circular statistics: Exploring the use of new methods and visualizations to study travel times," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 41-51.
    10. Lin, Ting (Grace) & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Robinson, Todd P. & Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Church, Richard L. & Olaru, Doina & Tapin, John & Han, Renlong, 2014. "Spatial analysis of access to and accessibility surrounding train stations: a case study of accessibility for the elderly in Perth, Western Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 111-120.
    11. Li Lin & Yuting Chen & Hong Zhu & Jiwang You, 2023. "The Effect of Color Saturation of Travel Pictures on Consumer Appeal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Yu Zou & Liwei Zhang & Wen Huang & Jiao Chen, 2025. "The Potential of Informal Green Space (IGS) in Enhancing Urban Green Space Accessibility and Optimization Strategies: A Case Study of Chengdu," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Silva, Cecília & Patatas, Tiago & Amante, Ana, 2017. "Evaluating the usefulness of the structural accessibility layer for planning practice – Planning practitioners’ perception," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 137-149.
    14. Bo Zhang & Liangyu Zhou & Zhiwen Yin & Ao Zhou & Jue Li, 2023. "Study on the Correlation Characteristics between Scenic Byway Network Accessibility and Self-Driving Tourism Spatial Behavior in Western Sichuan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Wang, Hui & Loo, Becky P.Y., 2024. "The public transport disadvantaged in a highly transit-oriented city: An analytical framework, key challenges and opportunities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Zuo, Ting & Wei, Heng & Liu, Hao & Yang, Y. Jeffrey, 2019. "Bi-level optimization approach for configuring population and employment distributions with minimized vehicle travel demand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 161-172.
    17. Cheng, Shaowu & Xie, Bing & Bie, Yiming & Zhang, Yaping & Zhang, Shen, 2018. "Measure dynamic individual spatial-temporal accessibility by public transit: Integrating time-table and passenger departure time," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 235-247.
    18. Xuefei Guo & Lijun Zhu & Yuansheng Tang & Zhijun Li, 2023. "Increased Humidity Improved Desert Riparian Ecosystems in the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China, from 1990 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Widener, Michael J. & Farber, Steven & Neutens, Tijs & Horner, Mark, 2015. "Spatiotemporal accessibility to supermarkets using public transit: an interaction potential approach in Cincinnati, Ohio," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 72-83.
    20. Karner, Alex, 2018. "Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 24-32.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9094-:d:1502849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.