IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1313-d1683314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential of Informal Green Space (IGS) in Enhancing Urban Green Space Accessibility and Optimization Strategies: A Case Study of Chengdu

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zou

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Liwei Zhang

    (Sichuan Institute of Land and Spatial Planning, Chengdu 610081, China)

  • Wen Huang

    (Sichuan Institute of Land and Spatial Planning, Chengdu 610081, China)

  • Jiao Chen

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

Abstract

The inequity in the distribution of green spaces in megacities has a detrimental effect on the physical and mental well-being of their inhabitants, highlighting the necessity for careful and strategic urban planning, along with appropriate regulatory interventions. Nevertheless, scholarly articles addressing the equity of access to urban green spaces primarily concentrate on urban parks, with limited studies examining the influence of alternative types of green spaces. This research initially recognized and categorized informal green spaces (IGS) located within the Third Ring Road of Chengdu, utilizing the UGS-1m dataset and area of interest (AOI) data, in accordance with a well-defined classification framework. Then, the G2SFCA method and Gini coefficient were employed to assess the impact of IGS on the green space accessibility, especially scenario analysis of open and shared use of green space. The findings indicate that (1) IGS in the narrow sense constitute 21.2% of the overall green spaces within the study area, resulting in a reduction of the Gini coefficient by 0.103; (2) IGS in the broad sense, including public affiliated green spaces, shows an even more positive effect on improving the equity of green space supply, with a reduction of the Gini coefficient by 0.28; (3) there exists great spatial disparity in accessibility improvement effect by different types of IGS, so public policies must be customized to reflect local circumstances, taking into account the practicality and associated costs of management and maintenance of various IGS as well as accessibility enhancement; (4) certain older residential areas may not be amenable to effective enhancement through the use of IGS alone, and these should then adopt a multidimensional greening strategy such as green-roof. The findings of this research offer valuable insights for the planning and management of green spaces in densely populated urban environments, thereby aiding in the development of more refined models for the development of “Garden Cities”.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zou & Liwei Zhang & Wen Huang & Jiao Chen, 2025. "The Potential of Informal Green Space (IGS) in Enhancing Urban Green Space Accessibility and Optimization Strategies: A Case Study of Chengdu," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1313-:d:1683314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1313/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1313/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beata Joanna Gawryszewska & Maciej Łepkowski & Łukasz Pietrych & Anna Wilczyńska & Piotr Archiciński, 2024. "The Structure of Beauty: Informal Green Spaces in Their Users’ Eyes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Minseo Kim & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Katsunori Furuya, 2018. "Residents’ Perception of Informal Green Space—A Case Study of Ichikawa City, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Piotr Archiciński & Arkadiusz Przybysz & Daria Sikorska & Marzena Wińska-Krysiak & Anderson Rodrigo Da Silva & Piotr Sikorski, 2024. "Conservation Management Practices for Biodiversity Preservation in Urban Informal Green Spaces: Lessons from Central European City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Yuehong Long & Jianxin Qin & Yang Wu & Ke Wang, 2023. "Analysis of Urban Park Accessibility Based on Space Syntax: Take the Urban Area of Changsha City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Rupprecht, Christoph, 2017. "Informal urban green space: Residents’ perception, use, and management preferences across four major Japanese shrinking cities," SocArXiv ug86b, Center for Open Science.
    6. Yawen Jin & Rongxiao He & Jingke Hong & Dan Luo & Guoling Xiong, 2023. "Assessing the Accessibility and Equity of Urban Green Spaces from Supply and Demand Perspectives: A Case Study of a Mountainous City in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Stanford, Hugh R. & Hurley, Joe & Garrard, Georgia E. & Kirk, Holly, 2024. "Finding the forgotten spaces: Using a social-ecological framework to map informal green space in Melbourne, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Zhipeng Zhu & Junyi Li & Ziru Chen, 2023. "Green space equity: spatial distribution of urban green spaces and correlation with urbanization in Xiamen, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 423-443, January.
    9. Krzysztof Herman & Leon Ciechanowski & Aleksandra Przegalińska, 2021. "Emotional Well-Being in Urban Wilderness: Assessing States of Calmness and Alertness in Informal Green Spaces (IGSs) with Muse—Portable EEG Headband," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taiyun Xia & Liwei Zhang & Yu Zou, 2025. "Mismatch Between Heat Exposure Risk and Blue-Green Exposure in Wuhan: A Coupled Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen-Yi Sun & Tzu-Pei Chiang & Ya-Wen Wu, 2025. "Residents’ Perceptions of Informal Green Spaces in High-Density Cities: Urban Land Governance Implications from Taipei," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Jiayi Jiang & Hong Xu & Ruochen Ma & Shi Chen & Huixin Wang & Ziang Zheng, 2024. "What Is the Perceived Environmental Restorative Potential of Informal Green Spaces? An Empirical Study Based on Visitor-Employed Photography," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Duy Thong Ta & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Google Street View and Machine Learning—Useful Tools for a Street-Level Remote Survey: A Case Study in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam and Ichikawa, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Nándor Zoltán Tráser & Gyula Nagy & Lajos Boros, 2025. "Uncovering Urban Green Space (Dis)Investment Through Cultural Ecosystem Service Potential: A Case Study of Szeged, Hungary," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Xiaosi Zhang & Jizhong Shao, 2024. "Evaluation of the Suitability of Street Vending Planning in Urban Public Space in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Hong Wu & Cong Gong & Rui Wang & Xiaoyue Niu & Yu Cao & Changhao Cao & Changjuan Hu, 2025. "Moderating Effects of Park Accessibility and External Environment on Park Satisfaction in a Mountainous City," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    8. Richard Smardon, 2020. "Thomas Panagopoulos. Landscape urbanism and green infrastructure," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 208-209, June.
    9. Catarina Patoilo Teixeira & Cláudia Oliveira Fernandes & Jack Ahern, 2021. "Novel Urban Ecosystems: Opportunities from and to Landscape Architecture," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Bing-Bing Zhou & Jingyuan Liu & Xiaoke Wang, 2025. "Advancing Sustainability Through Land-Related Approaches: Insights from NRC (1999) and a Bold Call to Action," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.
    11. Qiang Sheng & Dongyang Wan & Boya Yu, 2021. "Effect of Space Configurational Attributes on Social Interactions in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Daeho Kim & Yoonji Kim & Hyun Chan Sung & Seongwoo Jeon, 2025. "A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Potential Demand for Urban Parks Using Long-Term Population Projections," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-33, October.
    13. Walter Dachaga & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Land Tenure Security and Health Nexus: A Conceptual Framework for Navigating the Connections between Land Tenure Security and Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Haixia Zhao & Binjie Gu & Jinding Fan & Junqi Wang & Liancong Luo, 2023. "Socioeconomic Factors Influence the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Blue–Green Infrastructure Demand: A Case of Nanjing City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Agnieszka Olszewska-Guizzo & Ayako Mukoyama & Sho Naganawa & Ippeita Dan & Syeda Fabeha Husain & Cyrus S. Ho & Roger Ho, 2021. "Hemodynamic Response to Three Types of Urban Spaces before and after Lockdown during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-12, June.
    16. Minseo Kim & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Katsunori Furuya, 2018. "Residents’ Perception of Informal Green Space—A Case Study of Ichikawa City, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Zhipeng Xing & Sidong Zhao & Kerun Li, 2023. "Evolution Pattern and Spatial Mismatch of Urban Greenspace and Its Impact Mechanism: Evidence from Parkland of Hunan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-31, November.
    18. Agnieszka Stacherzak & Maria Hełdak, 2019. "Borough Development Dependent on Agricultural, Tourism, and Economy Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Stefania Toscano & Daniela Romano & Valerio Lazzeri & Luca Leotta & Francesca Bretzel, 2025. "How Can Plants Used for Ornamental Purposes Contribute to Urban Biodiversity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, April.
    20. Katherine Stewart & Maria Ignatieva, 2025. "Recognising the Fourth Nature: A Case Study of Spontaneous Urban Vegetation in Southwest Australian Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1313-:d:1683314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.