IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1466-d1701864.html

Residents’ Perceptions of Informal Green Spaces in High-Density Cities: Urban Land Governance Implications from Taipei

Author

Listed:
  • Chen-Yi Sun

    (Department of Land Economics, National Chengchi University, Taipei 11605, Taiwan)

  • Tzu-Pei Chiang

    (Department of Land Economics, National Chengchi University, Taipei 11605, Taiwan)

  • Ya-Wen Wu

    (Department of Management Information Systems, National Chengchi University, Taipei 11605, Taiwan)

Abstract

In high-density and land-scarce urban environments such as Taipei—a typical example of compact development in East Asia—informal green spaces (IGSs)—defined as unmanaged or unplanned vegetated urban areas such as vacant lots, street verges, and railway margins—play a growing role in urban environmental and social dynamics. This study explores residents’ perceptions of IGSs and examines how these spaces contribute to urban sustainability and land governance. Using a mixed-methods approach that combines the literature review, field observations, and a structured public opinion survey in Taipei’s Wenshan District, the study identifies key perceived benefits and drawbacks of IGSs. Findings show that residents highly value IGSs for enhancing urban greenery, offering recreational opportunities, and promoting physical and mental health. However, concerns persist regarding safety, sanitation, and maintenance—particularly fears of waste accumulation, mosquito breeding, and risks to children. The results highlight the dual nature of IGSs as both vital ecological assets and potential sources of urban disorder. These insights underscore the need for inclusive, community-based governance models that can transform IGSs into legitimate components of green infrastructure. The study contributes to emerging discussions on adaptive urban land governance by proposing that informal spaces be strategically integrated into urban planning frameworks to enhance environmental equity, resilience, and citizen well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen-Yi Sun & Tzu-Pei Chiang & Ya-Wen Wu, 2025. "Residents’ Perceptions of Informal Green Spaces in High-Density Cities: Urban Land Governance Implications from Taipei," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1466-:d:1701864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1466/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1466/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minseo Kim & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Katsunori Furuya, 2018. "Residents’ Perception of Informal Green Space—A Case Study of Ichikawa City, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Piotr Archiciński & Arkadiusz Przybysz & Daria Sikorska & Marzena Wińska-Krysiak & Anderson Rodrigo Da Silva & Piotr Sikorski, 2024. "Conservation Management Practices for Biodiversity Preservation in Urban Informal Green Spaces: Lessons from Central European City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Andrzej Długoński & Diana Dushkova, 2021. "The Hidden Potential of Informal Urban Greenspace: An Example of Two Former Landfills in Post-Socialist Cities (Central Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Rupprecht, Christoph, 2017. "Informal urban green space: Residents’ perception, use, and management preferences across four major Japanese shrinking cities," SocArXiv ug86b, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Zou & Liwei Zhang & Wen Huang & Jiao Chen, 2025. "The Potential of Informal Green Space (IGS) in Enhancing Urban Green Space Accessibility and Optimization Strategies: A Case Study of Chengdu," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Biernacka, Magdalena & Kronenberg, Jakub & Łaszkiewicz, Edyta & Czembrowski, Piotr & Amini Parsa, Vahid & Sikorska, Daria, 2023. "Beyond urban parks: Mapping informal green spaces in an urban–peri-urban gradient," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Duy Thong Ta & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Google Street View and Machine Learning—Useful Tools for a Street-Level Remote Survey: A Case Study in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam and Ichikawa, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Nándor Zoltán Tráser & Gyula Nagy & Lajos Boros, 2025. "Uncovering Urban Green Space (Dis)Investment Through Cultural Ecosystem Service Potential: A Case Study of Szeged, Hungary," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. Richard Smardon, 2020. "Thomas Panagopoulos. Landscape urbanism and green infrastructure," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 208-209, June.
    7. Catarina Patoilo Teixeira & Cláudia Oliveira Fernandes & Jack Ahern, 2021. "Novel Urban Ecosystems: Opportunities from and to Landscape Architecture," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Qiang Sheng & Dongyang Wan & Boya Yu, 2021. "Effect of Space Configurational Attributes on Social Interactions in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Andrzej Długoński & Diana Dushkova & Dagmar Haase, 2022. "Urban Cemeteries—Places of Multiple Diversity and Challenges. A Case Study from Łódź (Poland) and Leipzig (Germany)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Daeho Kim & Yoonji Kim & Hyun Chan Sung & Seongwoo Jeon, 2025. "A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Potential Demand for Urban Parks Using Long-Term Population Projections," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-33, October.
    11. Walter Dachaga & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Land Tenure Security and Health Nexus: A Conceptual Framework for Navigating the Connections between Land Tenure Security and Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Haixia Zhao & Binjie Gu & Jinding Fan & Junqi Wang & Liancong Luo, 2023. "Socioeconomic Factors Influence the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Blue–Green Infrastructure Demand: A Case of Nanjing City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Minseo Kim & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Katsunori Furuya, 2018. "Residents’ Perception of Informal Green Space—A Case Study of Ichikawa City, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Agnieszka Stacherzak & Maria Hełdak, 2019. "Borough Development Dependent on Agricultural, Tourism, and Economy Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Simon Stork & Bernd Pölling & Wolf Lorleberg & Rolf Morgenstern & Jan-Henning Feil, 2023. "Clustering Business Models of Heterogeneous Nature-Based Solutions Implementing Innovative Governance and Financing Concepts," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Monika Kopecká & Harini Nagendra & Andrew Millington, 2018. "Urban Land Systems: An Ecosystems Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4, January.
    17. Jackie Parker & Greg D. Simpson, 2018. "Public Green Infrastructure Contributes to City Livability: A Systematic Quantitative Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Daer Su & Jie Chen & Hongyu Li & Shixian Luo & Jing Xie & Huixin Wang & Fuhao Sun & Wanyue Ren & Takeshi Kinoshita, 2024. "Quantifying the Wild: Public Acceptance and Challenges of Urban Wildscapes in Chiba, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Yiming Liu & Xiangxiang Pan & Qing Liu & Guicai Li, 2023. "Establishing a Reliable Assessment of the Green View Index Based on Image Classification Techniques, Estimation, and a Hypothesis Testing Route," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Jiayi Jiang & Hong Xu & Ruochen Ma & Shi Chen & Huixin Wang & Ziang Zheng, 2024. "What Is the Perceived Environmental Restorative Potential of Informal Green Spaces? An Empirical Study Based on Visitor-Employed Photography," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1466-:d:1701864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.