IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4023-d1077061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Superstructure Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming Optimization for the Optimal Processing Pathway Selection of Sludge-to-Energy Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Morsy

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Farzad Hourfar

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Qinqin Zhu

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Ali Almansoori

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates)

  • Ali Elkamel

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    Department of Chemical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

The perception of sewage sludge has increasingly changed from being a waste, which is a burden to the environment and society, to a useful resource of materials and renewable energy. There are several available technologies at different stages of maturity that aim to convert sludge to energy in the form of electricity and/or fuels. In this paper, a decision-making support tool is proposed to help in choosing the optimal pathway for the sludge-to-energy conversion from a techno-economic perspective. The conversion technologies under study are: (1) anaerobic digestion, (2) pyrolysis, (3) gasification, (4) incineration, (5) supercritical water oxidation, (6) supercritical water gasification, as well as the corresponding dewatering and drying methods for each technology. Different synergies between the available technologies are compared by the formulation of a superstructure optimization problem expressed in a mixed-integer non-linear program (MINLP) model. The applicability of the proposed model is explored via a case study for a hypothetical sludge treatment plant with a capacity of 100 tons of dry solids (tDS) per day. The model is solved via the BARON solver using GAMS software within a reasonable processing time. According to the obtained results, the fast pyrolysis technology, coupled with filter press dewatering and thermal drying as pre-treatment steps, show the most promising outcomes with the minimum treatment cost of USD 180/tDS. Fast pyrolysis converts the sludge to bio-oil, which can be used as an alternative fuel after further refining, and biochar, which can be used for soil amendment or adsorption purposes. The model parameters are subject to uncertainty that is addressed in the sensitivity analysis section of this paper. Moreover, the pyrolysis pathway shows a high degree of robustness in most of the sensitivity analysis scenarios. Meanwhile, anaerobic digestion coupled with fast pyrolysis demonstrates the best energy recovery performance upon increasing electricity prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Morsy & Farzad Hourfar & Qinqin Zhu & Ali Almansoori & Ali Elkamel, 2023. "A Superstructure Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming Optimization for the Optimal Processing Pathway Selection of Sludge-to-Energy Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-34, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4023-:d:1077061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4023/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4023/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Meyer, Annelies & Cattrysse, Dirk & Van Orshoven, Jos, 2015. "A generic mathematical model to optimise strategic and tactical decisions in biomass-based supply chains (OPTIMASS)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 247-264.
    2. Ren, Jingzheng & Liang, Hanwei & Dong, Liang & Gao, Zhiqiu & He, Chang & Pan, Ming & Sun, Lu, 2017. "Sustainable development of sewage sludge-to-energy in China: Barriers identification and technologies prioritization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 384-396.
    3. De Meyer, Annelies & Cattrysse, Dirk & Ostermeyer, Pieter & Van Orshoven, Jos, 2016. "Implementation of OPTIMASS to optimise municipal wastewater sludge processing chains: Proof of concept," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 168-178.
    4. Rizwan, Muhammad & Lee, Jay H. & Gani, Rafiqul, 2015. "Optimal design of microalgae-based biorefinery: Economics, opportunities and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 69-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alperay Altıkat & Mehmet Hakkı Alma & Aysun Altıkat & Mehmet Emin Bilgili & Sefa Altıkat, 2024. "A Comprehensive Study of Biochar Yield and Quality Concerning Pyrolysis Conditions: A Multifaceted Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narula, Vishal & Khan, Mohd. Fazil & Negi, Ankit & Kalra, Shashvat & Thakur, Aman & Jain, Siddharth, 2017. "Low temperature optimization of biodiesel production from algal oil using CaO and CaO/Al2O3 as catalyst by the application of response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 879-884.
    2. Narula, Vishal & Thakur, Aman & Uniyal, Ankit & Kalra, Shashvat & Jain, Siddharth, 2017. "Process parameter optimization of low temperature transesterification of algae-Jatropha Curcas oil blend," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 983-988.
    3. Cui, Li & Chan, Hing Kai & Zhou, Yizhuo & Dai, Jing & Lim, Jia Jia, 2019. "Exploring critical factors of green business failure based on Grey-Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 450-461.
    4. Lim, Juin Yau & Teng, Sin Yong & How, Bing Shen & Nam, KiJeon & Heo, SungKu & Máša, Vítězslav & Stehlík, Petr & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2022. "From microalgae to bioenergy: Identifying optimally integrated biorefinery pathways and harvest scheduling under uncertainties in predicted climate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. He, Chao & Zhang, Quanguo & Ren, Jingzheng & Li, Zhaoling, 2017. "Combined cooling heating and power systems: Sustainability assessment under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 755-766.
    6. González Álvarez, José Francisco & Gonzalo de Grado, Jesús, 2019. "Study of combustion in CO2-Capturing semi-closed Brayton cycle conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1276-1290.
    7. Rodríguez, R. & Espada, J.J. & Moreno, J. & Vicente, G. & Bautista, L.F. & Morales, V. & Sánchez-Bayo, A. & Dufour, J., 2018. "Environmental analysis of Spirulina cultivation and biogas production using experimental and simulation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 724-732.
    8. Paul, Sanjoy Kumar & Chowdhury, Priyabrata & Moktadir, Md. Abdul & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2021. "Supply chain recovery challenges in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 316-329.
    9. Tang, J.P. & Lam, H.L. & Abdul Aziz, M.K. & Morad, N.A., 2017. "Palm biomass strategic resource managment – A competitive game analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 456-463.
    10. Henrique Piqueiro & Reinaldo Gomes & Romão Santos & Jorge Pinho de Sousa, 2023. "Managing Disruptions in a Biomass Supply Chain: A Decision Support System Based on Simulation/Optimisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Jensen, Ida Græsted & Münster, Marie & Pisinger, David, 2017. "Optimizing the supply chain of biomass and biogas for a single plant considering mass and energy losses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 744-758.
    12. Nicoletti, Jack & Ning, Chao & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Incorporating agricultural waste-to-energy pathways into biomass product and process network through data-driven nonlinear adaptive robust optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 556-571.
    13. Marwa G. Saad & Noura S. Dosoky & Mohamed S. Zoromba & Hesham M. Shafik, 2019. "Algal Biofuels: Current Status and Key Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Wu, Wei & Wang, Po-Han & Lee, Duu-Jong & Chang, Jo-Shu, 2017. "Global optimization of microalgae-to-biodiesel chains with integrated cogasification combined cycle systems based on greenhouse gas emissions reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 63-82.
    15. Olli-Jussi Korpinen & Mika Aalto & Raghu KC & Timo Tokola & Tapio Ranta, 2023. "Utilisation of Spatial Data in Energy Biomass Supply Chain Research—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Dwivedi, Ashish & Moktadir, Md. Abdul & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & de Carvalho, Daniel Estima, 2022. "Integrating the circular economy and industry 4.0 for sustainable development: Implications for responsible footwear production in a big data-driven world," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Liu, Wan-Yu & Lin, Chun-Cheng & Yeh, Tzu-Lei, 2017. "Supply chain optimization of forest biomass electricity and bioethanol coproduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 630-645.
    18. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Quirion-Blais, Olivier & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Development of a decision support tool for optimizing the short-term logistics of forest-based biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 662-677.
    19. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 587-599.
    20. Indre Siksnelyte & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Deepak Sharma, 2018. "An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4023-:d:1077061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.