IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3623-d1070363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biobjective Optimization Model Considering Risk and Profit for the Multienterprise Layout Design in Village-Level Industrial Parks in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xuemin Liu

    (Research Institute of Macro-Safety Science, School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Guozhong Huang

    (Research Institute of Macro-Safety Science, School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shengnan Ou

    (Research Institute of Macro-Safety Science, School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xingyu Xiao

    (Research Institute of Macro-Safety Science, School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xuehong Gao

    (Research Institute of Macro-Safety Science, School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhangzhou Meng

    (Shunde Association of Work Safety, Foshan 528000, China)

  • Youqiang Pan

    (Shunde Association of Work Safety, Foshan 528000, China)

  • Ibrahim M. Hezam

    (Department of Statistics & Operations Research, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

With the advent and development of Industry 4.0 and 5.0, manufacturing modes have changed and numerous newly complicated and integrated village-level industrial parks have emerged in the Southeast of China, where several enterprises are gathered in the same multistory building. The number of floors and surrounding enterprises can have an impact on accident risk. To reduce the overall risk level of industrial parks, the layout of enterprises with different risks needs to be well designed and optimized. However, to date, limited studies have been conducted to emphatically consider safety and optimize the enterprise layout at an industrial area level, and most studies focus on the cost of the layout. Therefore, this study proposed three biobjective mathematical optimization models to obtain the trade-off between minimizing risk and maximizing rental profit. Risk factors include the enterprise location and the association risk; the enterprise inherent safety risks are not considered. To solve this problem, a specific linearization strategy was proposed and an epsilon-constraint method was applied to obtain Pareto-optimal solutions. Subsequently, an industrial park in Shunde, China, was considered as a case study to verify the performance of the proposed models and methods. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of critical parameters was conducted. The critical factors influencing the objective functions were also analyzed to provide valuable managerial insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuemin Liu & Guozhong Huang & Shengnan Ou & Xingyu Xiao & Xuehong Gao & Zhangzhou Meng & Youqiang Pan & Ibrahim M. Hezam, 2023. "Biobjective Optimization Model Considering Risk and Profit for the Multienterprise Layout Design in Village-Level Industrial Parks in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3623-:d:1070363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3623/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3623/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bérubé, Jean-François & Gendreau, Michel & Potvin, Jean-Yves, 2009. "An exact [epsilon]-constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems: Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Profits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 39-50, April.
    2. Li, Ling, 2018. "China's manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 66-74.
    3. Derhami, Shahab & Smith, Jeffrey S. & Gue, Kevin R., 2020. "A simulation-based optimization approach to design optimal layouts for block stacking warehouses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Li, Jinhua & Smith, Alice E., 2018. "Block layout for attraction-based enterprises," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1100-1112.
    5. Ramazan Şahin & Sadegh Niroomand & Esra Duygu Durmaz & Saber Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi, 2020. "Mathematical formulation and hybrid meta-heuristic solution approaches for dynamic single row facility layout problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 313-336, December.
    6. Wang, Ruiqi & Zhao, Huan & Wu, Yan & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao & Liu, Mengxi, 2018. "An industrial facility layout design method considering energy saving based on surplus rectangle fill algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1038-1051.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dang, Duc-Cuong & Guibadj, Rym Nesrine & Moukrim, Aziz, 2013. "An effective PSO-inspired algorithm for the team orienteering problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 332-344.
    2. Alkaraan, Fadi & Elmarzouky, Mahmoud & Hussainey, Khaled & Venkatesh, V.G., 2023. "Sustainable strategic investment decision-making practices in UK companies: The influence of governance mechanisms on synergy between industry 4.0 and circular economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Tang, Lianhua & Li, Yantong & Bai, Danyu & Liu, Tao & Coelho, Leandro C., 2022. "Bi-objective optimization for a multi-period COVID-19 vaccination planning problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Srivastava, Deepak Kumar & Kumar, Vikas & Ekren, Banu Yetkin & Upadhyay, Arvind & Tyagi, Mrinal & Kumari, Archana, 2022. "Adopting Industry 4.0 by leveraging organisational factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Jinxuan Song & Xu Yan, 2023. "Impact of Government Subsidies, Competition, and Blockchain on Green Supply Chain Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Zhongwei Zhang & Lihui Wu & Zhaoyun Wu & Wenqiang Zhang & Shun Jia & Tao Peng, 2022. "Energy-Saving Oriented Manufacturing Workshop Facility Layout: A Solution Approach Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Nicolas Jozefowiez & Gilbert Laporte & Frédéric Semet, 2012. "A Generic Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization Problems: Application to the Multilabel Traveling Salesman Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 554-564, November.
    8. Diclehan Tezcaner & Murat Köksalan, 2011. "An Interactive Algorithm for Multi-objective Route Planning," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 379-394, August.
    9. Junkai He & Feng Chu & Feifeng Zheng & Ming Liu, 2021. "A green-oriented bi-objective disassembly line balancing problem with stochastic task processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 71-93, January.
    10. Kuldeep Lamba & Ravi Kumar & Shraddha Mishra & Shubhangini Rajput, 2020. "Sustainable dynamic cellular facility layout: a solution approach using simulated annealing-based meta-heuristic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 5-26, July.
    11. Xuecheng Tian & Yanxia Guan & Shuaian Wang, 2023. "Data Transformation in the Predict-Then-Optimize Framework: Enhancing Decision Making under Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, September.
    12. Na Yu & Chunfeng Zhao, 2021. "Chain Innovation Mechanism of the Manufacturing Industry in the Yangtze River Delta of China Based on Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    13. O’Neill, Sam & Wrigley, Paul & Bagdasar, Ovidiu, 2022. "A mixed-integer linear programming formulation for the modular layout of three-dimensional connected systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 739-754.
    14. Ahn, Jaemyung & de Weck, Olivier & Geng, Yue & Klabjan, Diego, 2012. "Column generation based heuristics for a generalized location routing problem with profits arising in space exploration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 47-59.
    15. Wangying Xu & Xiaobing Yu, 2022. "Adaptive Guided Spatial Compressive Cuckoo Search for Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, February.
    16. Xun Liu & Xiaobo Li, 2022. "Exploring the Formation Mechanism of Unsafe Construction Behavior and Testing Efficient Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Elmira Farrokhizadeh & Seyed Amin Seyfi-Shishavan & Sule Itir Satoglu, 2022. "Blood supply planning during natural disasters under uncertainty: a novel bi-objective model and an application for red crescent," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 73-113, December.
    18. Christian Artigues & Nicolas Jozefowiez & Boadu M. Sarpong, 2018. "Column generation algorithms for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems with a min–max objective," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(2), pages 117-142, June.
    19. Burdett, Robert & Kozan, Erhan, 2016. "A multi-criteria approach for hospital capacity analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 505-521.
    20. Peter Reiter & Walter Gutjahr, 2012. "Exact hybrid algorithms for solving a bi-objective vehicle routing problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(1), pages 19-43, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3623-:d:1070363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.