IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v10y2019i5d10.1007_s13198-019-00824-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bi-objective integer programming analysis based on the characteristic equation

Author

Listed:
  • Masar Al-Rabeeah

    (RMIT University
    Basrah University)

  • Santosh Kumar

    (RMIT University
    University of Melbourne)

  • Ali Al-Hasani

    (RMIT University
    Basrah University)

  • Elias Munapo

    (North West University)

  • Andrew Eberhard

    (RMIT University)

Abstract

In this paper, a bi-objective integer programming problem is analysed using the characteristic equation that was developed to solve a single-objective pure integer program. This equation can also provides other ranked solutions i.e. 2nd, 3rd,... best solutions. These solutions are potential non-dominated points for a bi-objective integer program, which is being investigated in this paper. A “C” code is developed to solve the characteristic equation, a tool which is not available in the IBM ILOG CPLEX library. Two versions of this algorithm are developed to identify the non-dominated points for the bi-objective integer programming problem. The second version improves on the first by reducing the number of search steps. Computational experiments are carried out with respect to the two algorithms developed in this paper and comparisons have also been carried out with one of the recently developed method, the balanced box method. These computational experiments indicate that the second version of the algorithm developed in this paper performed significantly better than the first version and out performed the balanced box method with respect to both CPU time and the number of iterations.

Suggested Citation

  • Masar Al-Rabeeah & Santosh Kumar & Ali Al-Hasani & Elias Munapo & Andrew Eberhard, 2019. "Bi-objective integer programming analysis based on the characteristic equation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(5), pages 937-944, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00824-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-019-00824-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-019-00824-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-019-00824-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chalmet, L. G. & Lemonidis, L. & Elzinga, D. J., 1986. "An algorithm for the bi-criterion integer programming problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 292-300, May.
    2. Bérubé, Jean-François & Gendreau, Michel & Potvin, Jean-Yves, 2009. "An exact [epsilon]-constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems: Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Profits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 39-50, April.
    3. Matthias Ehrgott, 2006. "A discussion of scalarization techniques for multiple objective integer programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 343-360, October.
    4. M. Ehrgott & S. Ruzika, 2008. "Improved ε-Constraint Method for Multiobjective Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 375-396, September.
    5. Y. P. Aneja & K. P. K. Nair, 1979. "Bicriteria Transportation Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 73-78, January.
    6. Thomas Stidsen & Kim Allan Andersen & Bernd Dammann, 2014. "A Branch and Bound Algorithm for a Class of Biobjective Mixed Integer Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 1009-1032, April.
    7. Natashia Boland & Hadi Charkhgard & Martin Savelsbergh, 2015. "A Criterion Space Search Algorithm for Biobjective Integer Programming: The Balanced Box Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 735-754, November.
    8. Natashia Boland & Hadi Charkhgard & Martin Savelsbergh, 2015. "A Criterion Space Search Algorithm for Biobjective Mixed Integer Programming: The Triangle Splitting Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 597-618, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boland, Natashia & Charkhgard, Hadi & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2017. "The Quadrant Shrinking Method: A simple and efficient algorithm for solving tri-objective integer programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 873-885.
    2. Cacchiani, Valentina & D’Ambrosio, Claudia, 2017. "A branch-and-bound based heuristic algorithm for convex multi-objective MINLPs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 920-933.
    3. Jesús Sáez-Aguado & Paula Camelia Trandafir, 2018. "Variants of the $$ \varepsilon $$ ε -constraint method for biobjective integer programming problems: application to p-median-cover problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 87(2), pages 251-283, April.
    4. Miriam Enzi & Sophie N. Parragh & Jakob Puchinger, 2022. "The bi-objective multimodal car-sharing problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(2), pages 307-348, June.
    5. Przybylski, Anthony & Gandibleux, Xavier, 2017. "Multi-objective branch and bound," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 856-872.
    6. Hadi Charkhgard & Martin Savelsbergh & Masoud Talebian, 2018. "Nondominated Nash points: application of biobjective mixed integer programming," 4OR, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 151-171, June.
    7. Yıldız, Gazi Bilal & Soylu, Banu, 2019. "A multiobjective post-sales guarantee and repair services network design problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 305-320.
    8. Fattahi, Ali & Turkay, Metin, 2018. "A one direction search method to find the exact nondominated frontier of biobjective mixed-binary linear programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 415-425.
    9. De Santis, Marianna & Grani, Giorgio & Palagi, Laura, 2020. "Branching with hyperplanes in the criterion space: The frontier partitioner algorithm for biobjective integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 57-69.
    10. Seyyed Amir Babak Rasmi & Ali Fattahi & Metin Türkay, 2021. "SASS: slicing with adaptive steps search method for finding the non-dominated points of tri-objective mixed-integer linear programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 841-876, January.
    11. Esmaeili, Somayeh & Bashiri, Mahdi & Amiri, Amirhossein, 2023. "An exact criterion space search algorithm for a bi-objective blood collection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 210-232.
    12. Soylu, Banu, 2018. "The search-and-remove algorithm for biobjective mixed-integer linear programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 281-299.
    13. Natashia Boland & Hadi Charkhgard & Martin Savelsbergh, 2015. "A Criterion Space Search Algorithm for Biobjective Integer Programming: The Balanced Box Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 735-754, November.
    14. Sune Lauth Gadegaard & Lars Relund Nielsen & Matthias Ehrgott, 2019. "Bi-objective Branch-and-Cut Algorithms Based on LP Relaxation and Bound Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 790-804, October.
    15. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    16. Acuna, Jorge A. & Zayas-Castro, José L. & Charkhgard, Hadi, 2020. "Ambulance allocation optimization model for the overcrowding problem in US emergency departments: A case study in Florida," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Soylu, Banu & Katip, Hatice, 2019. "A multiobjective hub-airport location problem for an airline network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 412-425.
    18. Karsu, Özlem & Kocaman, Ayse Selin, 2021. "Towards the Sustainable Development Goals: A Bi-objective framework for electricity access," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Guillermo Cabrera-Guerrero & Matthias Ehrgott & Andrew J. Mason & Andrea Raith, 2022. "Bi-objective optimisation over a set of convex sub-problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(2), pages 1507-1532, December.
    20. Nathan Adelgren & Akshay Gupte, 2022. "Branch-and-Bound for Biobjective Mixed-Integer Linear Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 909-933, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00824-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.