IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3419-d1067323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation and E-Commerce Models, the Technology Catalysts for Sustainable Development: The Emirate of Dubai Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Alessio Faccia

    (School of Business, University of Birmingham Dubai, Dubai 341799, United Arab Emirates
    University College London-Centre for Blockchain Technology (UCL-CBT), London WC1E6BT, UK)

  • Corlise Liesl Le Roux

    (American University in the Emirates, Dubai 503000, United Arab Emirates)

  • Vishal Pandey

    (Jindal Global Business School, O.P. Jindal Global University (JGU), Sonipat 131001, Haryana, India)

Abstract

Innovation and e-commerce models are essential in sustainable development globally. They are among the most important technology and innovation catalysts of Dubai’s pillars. Technologies are essential parts of the strategic approach that aims to become a completely paperless city through digitalisation. The analyses begin with reviewing the most relevant literature on sustainable e-commerce and the e-commerce models. Furthermore, the research identifies the innovation and sustainable paradigms most suitable for developing technologies and e-commerce successfully. Finally, the focus is shifted to the best and most innovative and sustainable e-commerce practices adopted by the companies, contextualised in the Emirate of Dubai as a relevant case study. The primary outcome of this research demonstrated how a thriving environment, marked by adequate investments and opportunities provided by the government, supported e-commerce development and technology adoption. Subsequently, those models are matched with sustainable strategies. The analysis is carried out through an organic growth research framework. The results, therefore, provide valuable insights to multiple stakeholders. Indeed, despite some limitations, the Emirates of Dubai can be considered a benchmark in terms of a strategic digitalisation approach, as its ecosystem proves particularly fruitful for e-commerce development and company sales growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessio Faccia & Corlise Liesl Le Roux & Vishal Pandey, 2023. "Innovation and E-Commerce Models, the Technology Catalysts for Sustainable Development: The Emirate of Dubai Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3419-:d:1067323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mika Pasanen, 2007. "Sme Growth Strategies: Organic Or Non-Organic?," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 317-338.
    2. John E. Ettlie & William P. Bridges & Robert D. O'Keefe, 1984. "Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 682-695, June.
    3. WARTER, Iulian & WARTER, Liviu, 2017. "Cultural Due Diligence In M&A. Importance Of Soft Risks Factors," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 17(2), pages 38-61.
    4. Christopher L. Weber & Jonathan G. Koomey & H. Scott Matthews, 2010. "The Energy and Climate Change Implications of Different Music Delivery Methods," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(5), pages 754-769, October.
    5. Chrissa Pagitsas, 2022. "Chief Sustainability Officers At Work," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-4842-7866-6, September.
    6. Bahadir, S. Cem & Bharadwaj, Sundar & Parzen, Michael, 2009. "A meta-analysis of the determinants of organic sales growth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 263-275.
    7. Magali Jara & Dany Vyt & Olivier Mevel & Thierry Morvan & Nélida Morvan, 2018. "Measuring customers benefits of click and collect," Post-Print halshs-01806403, HAL.
    8. Kendra Briken & Phil Taylor, 2018. "Fulfilling the ‘British way’: beyond constrained choice—Amazon workers' lived experiences of workfare," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5-6), pages 438-458, November.
    9. Robert Mogielnicki, 2021. "Free Zones in Dubai: Accelerators for Artificial Intelligence in the Gulf," Springer Books, in: Elie Azar & Anthony N. Haddad (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in the Gulf, chapter 0, pages 141-159, Springer.
    10. Maria Chiara Di Guardo & Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Elona Marku, 2019. "M&A and diversification strategies: what effect on quality of inventive activity?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 669-692, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adel Ben Youssef & Mounir Dahmani, 2023. "Examining the Drivers of E-Commerce Adoption by Moroccan Firms: A Multi-Model Analysis," Post-Print hal-04374231, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verhoeven, Dennis & Bakker, Jurriën & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2016. "Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 707-723.
    2. Peschl, Markus F. & Bottaro, Gloria & Hartner-Tiefenthaler, Martina & Rötzer, Katharina, 2014. "Learning how to innovate as a socio-epistemological process of co-creation. Towards a constructivist teaching strategy for innovation," MPRA Paper 66539, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Axenbeck, Janna & Niebel, Thomas, 2021. "Climate Protection Potentials of Digitalized Production Processes: Microeconometric Evidence," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238007, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Cai, Ya-Jun & Lo, Chris K.Y., 2020. "Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Ola, Oreoluwa & Menapace, Luisa, 2020. "A meta-analysis understanding smallholder entry into high-value markets," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Spanos, Yiannis E. & Voudouris, Irini, 2009. "Antecedents and trajectories of AMT adoption: The case of Greek manufacturing SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 144-155, February.
    9. Gosselin, Maurice, 1997. "The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 105-122, February.
    10. Heng, M.S.H. & Trauth, E.M. & Fischer, S., 1994. "An innovation model of information planning," Serie Research Memoranda 0007, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    11. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Vivona, Roberto, 2021. "Depoliticizing the European immigration debate: How to employ public sector innovation to integrate migrants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    12. Dost Mir & Arshad Muhammad & Afsar Bilal, 2018. "The Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Types of Process Innovation Capabilities and Moderating Role of Social Capital," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Li-Min Chuang & Wen-Chia Tsai, 2014. "The Organizational Innovativeness Inventory for information and electronic enterprises: Development and Validation," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(4), pages 302-309.
    14. Paul E. Bierly III & Paula S. Daly, 2007. "Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(4), pages 493-516, July.
    15. Molina-Morales, Francesc Xavier & Martínez-Cháfer, Luís & Valiente-Bordanova, David, 2017. "Disruptive Technological Innovations as New Opportunities for Mature Industrial Clusters. The Case of Digital Printing Innovation in the Spanish Ceramic Tile Cluster," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 39, pages 39-57.
    16. Escrig-Tena, Ana B. & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes & García-Juan, Beatriz & Beltrán-Martín, Inmaculada, 2018. "The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1-14.
    17. Barbara Kasulaitis & Callie W. Babbitt & Anna Christina Tyler, 2021. "The role of consumer preferences in reducing material intensity of electronic products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 435-447, April.
    18. Hullova, Dusana & Trott, Paul & Simms, Christopher Don, 2016. "Uncovering the reciprocal complementarity between product and process innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 929-940.
    19. Yulia Vertakova & Inga Vselenskaya & Vladimir Plotnikov, 2021. "Mergers and Acquisitions Risk Modeling," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    20. Ciabuschi, Francesco & Forsgren, Mats & Martín Martín, Oscar, 2012. "Headquarters involvement and efficiency of innovation development and transfer in multinationals: A matter of sheer ignorance?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 130-144.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3419-:d:1067323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.