IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1885-d1040430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Antecedents of Learning Management System Usage among University Lecturers Using an Integrated TAM-TOE Model

Author

Listed:
  • Twana Tahseen Sulaiman

    (Department of Banking and Finance, College of Administration and Financial Sciences, University of Cihan-Erbil, Erbil 44001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq)

  • Anuar Shah Bali Mahomed

    (School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Azmawani Abd Rahman

    (School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Mazlan Hassan

    (School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

Abstract

Even after the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of the learning management system (LMS) is still low among university lecturers in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. The objective of the current study is to understand the factors influencing LMS usage in universities using indicators from Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) framework. This study examined system quality, service quality, information quality, technical support, and government policies as essential variables for affecting LMS usage using perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) as mediating variables. To reach the aim of this study, the conceptual model was proposed based on TAM integrated with external factors adapted from TOE framework. Quantitative research using a questionnaire was conducted on a sample of 393 lecturers. The study used a structural equation modelling technique, and the results were analysed by SmartPLS 4.0 software. The findings show that information quality significantly correlates with PU and PEOU. Service quality, system quality, and government policy show a significant relationship with either PU or PEOU. However, technical support shows an insignificant relationship with PU and PEOU. Inside the TAM itself, PU and PEOU significantly correlate with LMS usage. Finally, the current study demonstrated the role of PU and POEU as mediators between external factors and LMS usage. These study findings have implications for research and practice to guide university leaders and policymakers in understanding the factors that must be addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Twana Tahseen Sulaiman & Anuar Shah Bali Mahomed & Azmawani Abd Rahman & Mazlan Hassan, 2023. "Understanding Antecedents of Learning Management System Usage among University Lecturers Using an Integrated TAM-TOE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1885-:d:1040430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    2. Porter, Constance Elise & Donthu, Naveen, 2006. "Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 999-1007, September.
    3. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.
    4. Hadeel Alharbi & Kamaljeet Sandhu, 2018. "Explaining and predicting continuance usage intention of e-learning recommender systems: an empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(3), pages 297-323.
    5. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    6. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uthman Alturki & Ahmed Aldraiweesh, 2023. "The Factors Influencing 21st Century Skills and Problem-Solving Skills: The Acceptance of Blackboard as Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    2. Yang, Byunghwa & Kim, Youngchan & Yoo, Changjo, 2013. "The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1345-1352.
    3. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2015. "Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 127-142, February.
    4. Brenda Mak & Robert C. Nickerson & Henri Isaac, 2009. "A Model Of Attitudes Towards The Acceptance Of Mobile Phone Use In Public Places," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 305-326.
    5. Julian M. Müller, 2019. "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing—A Study across Europe, China, and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Kamilah Kamaludin & Kamil Zaki Kamaludin, 2017. "User Acceptance of the Human Resource Information System: A Study of a Private Hospital in Malaysia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 207-217.
    7. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Kerstin Pezoldt & Jana Schliewe, 2012. "Akzeptanz von Self-Service-Technologien: State of the Art," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 205-253, March.
    9. Baier, Daniel & Stüber, Eva, 2010. "Acceptance of recommendations to buy in online retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 173-180.
    10. Dhiman, Neeraj & Jamwal, Mohit & Kumar, Ajay, 2023. "Enhancing value in customer journey by considering the (ad)option of artificial intelligence tools," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Abbes, Intissar & Hallem, Yousra & Taga, Nadia, 2020. "Second-hand shopping and brand loyalty: The role of online collaborative redistribution platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    12. Roemer, Ellen & Henseler, Jörg, 2022. "The dynamics of electric vehicle acceptance in corporate fleets: Evidence from Germany," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & J. Sánchez-Fernández, 2018. "A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 25-64, March.
    14. V. Uma Maheswari & Uma Chandrasekaran, 2018. "Buying Insurance Online: Are we there yet?," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 9(2), pages 30-41, May.
    15. Yajiong Xue & Huigang Liang & Liansheng Wu, 2011. "Punishment, Justice, and Compliance in Mandatory IT Settings," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 400-414, June.
    16. Soud M. Almahamid & Amjad F. Tweiqat & Mousa S. Almanaseer, 2016. "University website quality characteristics and success: lecturers' perspective," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(1), pages 41-61.
    17. Kwahk, Kee-Young & Ahn, Hyunchul & Ryu, Young U., 2018. "Understanding mandatory IS use behavior: How outcome expectations affect conative IS use," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 64-76.
    18. Benjamin T. Hazen & Robert E. Overstreet & Yacan Wang, 2015. "Predicting Public Bicycle Adoption Using the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Kumar, Deepak S. & Purani, Keyoor & Viswanathan, Shyam A., 2018. "Influences of ‘appscape’ on mobile app adoption and m-loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 132-141.
    20. Sudipa Majumdar & Vijay Pujari, 2022. "Exploring usage of mobile banking apps in the UAE: a categorical regression analysis," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 177-189, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1885-:d:1040430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.