IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1159-d1028584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of the Aviation Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) Industry in Northeast Asian Countries: A Suggestion for the Development of Korea’s MRO Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Seungju Nam

    (Aviation Safety Department, Korea Institute of Aviation Safety Technology, Incheon 22851, Republic of Korea)

  • Sejong Choi

    (Air Mechanical Department, Hanseo University, Seosan 32158, Republic of Korea)

  • Georgia Edell

    (Aerospace and Defense Department, Frost and Sullivan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1070052, Japan)

  • Amartya De

    (Aerospace and Defense Department, Frost and Sullivan, Sydney 2000, Australia)

  • Woon-Kyung Song

    (School of Business, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang 10540, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) has become more important to the air transport industry during the pandemic since it plays a crucial role in improving safety, ensuring profitability, and achieving sustainability in the industry. The growth of the Northeast Asian MRO market is forecasted to be remarkable, making the region the next MRO powerhouse. This study investigates the MRO industry in Northeast Asian countries (China, Japan, and Korea) to gain insights for strategical development of the industry. SWOT analysis was used to understand external macro-environment and internal conditions comprehensively, with comparative analysis then performed to find each country’s competitiveness. SWOT analysis of the external environment of the aviation MRO industry in Northeast Asia finds opportunities from increased competition in the air transport industry and technological development and threats caused by aircraft advancements (less scheduled maintenance checks) and a limited workforce. Internal conditions are analyzed using six factors: cost, workforce, geographic presence, quality with shorter turnaround time, technological advancement, and certification. The results indicate that Korea’s MRO industry has strong human resources but weak technological capabilities. The competitive advantage of the Chinese MRO industry stems from both a large number of aircraft and lower costs. While Japan possesses superior MRO technology, high labor costs reduce their industrial competitiveness. Based on a comparative analysis, this study provides strategic insights into the improvements that can be made in the Korean MRO industry. Since composite MRO of newer aircraft presents a small technological gap which can be overcome with high-quality human resources, Korea should focus its resources and policies on promoting the composite MRO industry due to its high growth potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Seungju Nam & Sejong Choi & Georgia Edell & Amartya De & Woon-Kyung Song, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of the Aviation Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) Industry in Northeast Asian Countries: A Suggestion for the Development of Korea’s MRO Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1159-:d:1028584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Rowley & Jun Ishikawa & Ingyu Oh, 2019. "Changing facets of leadership in East Asia: globalization, innovation and performance in Japan, South Korea and China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 161-172, March.
    2. Marina Efthymiou & Katie McCarthy & Chris Markou & John F. O’Connell, 2022. "An Exploratory Research on Blockchain in Aviation: The Case of Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Lee, Wen-Kuei, 2006. "Risk assessment modeling in aviation safety management," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 267-273.
    4. Yoon, Sung Wook & Jeong, Suk Jae, 2015. "An alternative methodology for planning baggage carousel capacity expansion: A case study of Incheon International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 63-74.
    5. Mark Beeson and Troy Lee-Brown, 2017. "The Future of Asian Regionalism: Not What It Used to Be?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201714, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    6. Hayoung Kim & Namryoung Lee, 2022. "The Effects of the In-Flight Safety Information Characteristics on the Safety Behavioral Intention of Airline Passengers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Dhanisetty, V.S. Viswanath & Verhagen, W.J.C. & Curran, Richard, 2018. "Multi-criteria weighted decision making for operational maintenance processes," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 152-164.
    8. Nicholas Borroz and Hunter Marston, 2017. "How Trump can Avoid War with China," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201744, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    9. Nieto, María Rosa & Carmona-Benítez, Rafael Bernardo, 2018. "ARIMA + GARCH + Bootstrap forecasting method applied to the airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Mark Beeson & Troy Lee-Brown, 2017. "The Future of Asian Regionalism: Not What It Used to Be?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 195-206, May.
    11. Machado, Marcio Cardoso & Gomes Eller Araújo, Michelle Aparecida & Soto Urbina, Ligia Maria & Macau, Flavio Romero, 2016. "A qualitative study of outsourced aeronautical maintenance: The case of Brazilian organizations," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 176-184.
    12. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    13. Seungju Nam & Chunghun Ha & Hyun Cheol Lee, 2018. "Redesigning In-Flight Service with Service Blueprint Based on Text Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 642-664.
    15. Carmona-Benítez, Rafael Bernardo & Nieto, María Rosa, 2020. "SARIMA damp trend grey forecasting model for airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Ho, Ying-Chin & Chang, Ou-Chuan & Wang, Wen-Bo, 2008. "An empirical study of key success factors for Six Sigma Green Belt projects at an Asian MRO company," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 263-269.
    17. Parton, John & Ryley, Tim, 2012. "A business analysis of XL Airways: What lessons can be learned from the failure?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 42-48.
    18. Ian Chambers & Jeremy Russell‐Smith & Robert Costanza & Julian Cribb & Sean Kerins & Melissa George & Glenn James & Howard Pedersen & Paul Lane & Peter Christopherson & Jennifer Ansell & Kamaljit Sang, 2018. "Australia's north, Australia's future: A vision and strategies for sustainable economic, ecological and social prosperity in northern Australia," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 615-640, September.
    19. Nicholas Borroz & Hunter Marston, 2017. "How Trump can Avoid War with China," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 613-620, September.
    20. Nam, Seungju & Song, Woon-Kyung & Yoon, Heekweon, 2023. "An maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) safety oversight system analysis: A case in Korea," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    21. Oster, Clinton V. & Strong, John S. & Zorn, C. Kurt, 2013. "Analyzing aviation safety: Problems, challenges, opportunities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 148-164.
    22. Lurkin, Virginie & Garrow, Laurie A. & Higgins, Matthew J. & Newman, Jeffrey P. & Schyns, Michael, 2018. "Modeling competition among airline itineraries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 157-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel & Sarnie, Robert & Hoover, Jack, 2023. "What does ESG risk premia tell us about mutual fund sustainability levels: A difference-in-differences analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Daniel Zdolšek & Sabina Taškar Beloglavec, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting Ecosystem: A Once-in-a-Lifetime Overhaul during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Wang, Zhanwei & Song, Woon-Kyung, 2020. "Sustainable airport development with performance evaluation forecasts: A case study of 12 Asian airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Jin Zhu & Fei Huang, 2023. "Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Ling, Aifan & Li, Junxue & Wen, Limin & Zhang, Yi, 2023. "When trackers are aware of ESG: Do ESG ratings matter to tracking error portfolio performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Rafael Bernardo Carmona Benitez & Maria Rosa Nieto, 2023. "A methodology for calculating the unmet passenger demand in the air transportation industry," Papers 23003, Working Papers of Business and Economics School. Anahuac University (Mexico)..
    8. Paola Demartini & Claudia Pagliei, 2023. "Can we trust ESG Ratings? Some insights based on a bibliometric analysis of ESG data quality and rating reliability," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2 Suppl.), pages 161-187.
    9. Maria Rosa Nieto & Rafael Bernardo Carmona-Benítez, 2021. "An Approach to Measure the Performance and the Efficiency of Future Airport Infrastructure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Huang, Chia-Jung & Fu, Chiang, 2020. "Incorporating continuous representation of preferences for flight departure times into stated itinerary choice modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 10-20.
    11. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    12. Fang, Mingyue & Nie, Huihua & Shen, Xinyi, 2023. "Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    13. Won-Kyu Lim & Cheong-Kyu Park, 2022. "Mandating Gender Diversity and the Value Relevance of Sustainable Development Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    14. Choi, Gahyun & Park, Kwangyeol & Yi, Eojin & Ahn, Kwangwon, 2023. "Price fairness: Clean energy stocks and the overall market," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    15. Xiaodong Teng & Kun-Shan Wu & Lopin Kuo & Bao-Guang Chang, 2023. "Investigating the double-edged sword effect of environmental, social and governance practices on corporate risk-taking in the high-tech industry," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 511-549, June.
    16. Freundt, Jana & Lange, Andreas, 2021. "On the voluntary provision of public goods under risk," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    17. Willem Schramade, 2016. "Integrating ESG into valuation models and investment decisions: the value-driver adjustment approach," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 95-111, April.
    18. K. Thomas Liaw, 2020. "Survey of Green Bond Pricing and Investment Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Meles, Antonio & Salerno, Dario & Sampagnaro, Gabriele & Verdoliva, Vincenzo & Zhang, Jianing, 2023. "The influence of green innovation on default risk: Evidence from Europe," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 692-710.
    20. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1159-:d:1028584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.