IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16335-d1288664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Social and Economic Factors Influencing PM2.5 Emissions at the City Level in China

Author

Listed:
  • Han Huang

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Ping Jiang

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Yuanxiang Chen

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Respirable suspended particles (PM2.5) are one of the key components of haze, which not only causes a variety of lung, intestinal, and vascular diseases, but also affects cognitive levels. China is facing the challenge of severe PM2.5 concentrations, especially in urban areas with a high population density. Understanding the key factors that influence PM2.5 concentrations is fundamental for the adoption of targeted measures. Therefore, this study used the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method to identify the key factors influencing PM2.5 concentrations in 236 cities in northeastern, western, central, and eastern China. The findings were as follows. The emission intensity (EI) played an important suppressing role on PM2.5 concentrations in all cities from 2011–2020. The energy intensity (EnI) inhibited PM2.5 concentrations in 157 cities; the economic output (EO) stimulated PM2.5 concentrations in some less economically developed regions; and population (P) spurred PM2.5 concentrations in135 cities, mainly concentrated in developed eastern cities. This study provides a whole picture of the key factors influencing PM2.5 concentrations in Chinese cities, and the findings can act as the scientific basis and guidance for Chinese city authorities in formulating policies toward PM2.5 concentration reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Huang & Ping Jiang & Yuanxiang Chen, 2023. "Analysis of the Social and Economic Factors Influencing PM2.5 Emissions at the City Level in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16335-:d:1288664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ang, B.W. & Liu, F.L., 2001. "A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 537-548.
    2. Wang, Juan & Li, Ziming & Wu, Tong & Wu, Siyu & Yin, Tingwei, 2022. "The decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions from power generation in Chinese provincial power sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Ang, B. W., 2005. "The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 867-871, May.
    4. Zhang, Wei & Wang, Nan, 2021. "Decomposition of energy intensity in Chinese industries using an extended LMDI method of production element endowment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. Yan, Dan & Ren, Xiaohang & Kong, Ying & Ye, Bin & Liao, Zangyi, 2020. "The heterogeneous effects of socioeconomic determinants on PM2.5 concentrations using a two-step panel quantile regression," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yousaf Raza, Muhammad & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Development trend of Pakistan's natural gas consumption: A sectorial decomposition analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    2. Lu, I.J. & Lin, Sue J. & Lewis, Charles, 2007. "Decomposition and decoupling effects of carbon dioxide emission from highway transportation in Taiwan, Germany, Japan and South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 3226-3235, June.
    3. de Freitas, Luciano Charlita & Kaneko, Shinji, 2011. "Decomposition of CO2 emissions change from energy consumption in Brazil: Challenges and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1495-1504, March.
    4. Xuankai Deng & Yanhua Yu & Yanfang Liu, 2015. "Effect of Construction Land Expansion on Energy-Related Carbon Emissions: Empirical Analysis of China and Its Provinces from 2001 to 2011," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Zhang, Chenjun & Wu, Yusi & Yu, Yu, 2020. "Spatial decomposition analysis of water intensity in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Tian, Yihui & Zhu, Qinghua & Geng, Yong, 2013. "An analysis of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 352-361.
    7. Petrick, Sebastian, 2013. "Carbon efficiency, technology, and the role of innovation patterns: Evidence from German plant-level microdata," Kiel Working Papers 1833, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Zbigniew Gołaś, 2022. "Changes in Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions of the Agricultural Sector in Poland from 2000 to 2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Md. Afzal Hossain & Jean Engo & Songsheng Chen, 2021. "The main factors behind Cameroon’s CO2 emissions before, during and after the economic crisis of the 1980s," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4500-4520, March.
    10. Yan, Qingyou & Zhang, Qian & Zou, Xin, 2016. "Decomposition analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in China's regional thermal electricity generation, 2000–2020," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 788-794.
    11. Román-Collado, Rocío & Casado Ruíz, Virginia, 2024. "Key effects contributing to changes in energy imports in the EU-27 between 2000 and 2020: A decomposition analysis based on the Sankey diagram," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Lin, Boqiang & Ouyang, Xiaoling, 2014. "Analysis of energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions and reduction potential in the Chinese non-metallic mineral products industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 688-697.
    13. Fernández González, P. & Landajo, M. & Presno, M.J., 2014. "Tracking European Union CO2 emissions through LMDI (logarithmic-mean Divisia index) decomposition. The activity revaluation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 741-750.
    14. Lin, Boqiang & Lei, Xiaojing, 2015. "Carbon emissions reduction in China's food industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 483-492.
    15. Wang, Wenchao & Mu, Hailin & Kang, Xudong & Song, Rongchen & Ning, Yadong, 2010. "Changes in industrial electricity consumption in china from 1998 to 2007," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3684-3690, July.
    16. Long, Tengju & Wu, Ge & Miao, Zhuang & Chen, Xiaodong, 2024. "Quantifying consumption-based environmental productivity from “Energy-Environment Footprints”," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    17. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2018. "Decomposing the change in energy consumption in China's nonferrous metal industry: An empirical analysis based on the LMDI method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2652-2663.
    18. Henriques, Sofia Teives & Borowiecki, Karol J., 2017. "The drivers of long-run CO2 emissions in Europe, North America and Japan since 1800," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 537-549.
    19. Oluwatoyin J. Gbadeyan & Joseph Muthivhi & Linda Z. Linganiso & Nirmala Deenadayalu, 2024. "Decoupling Economic Growth from Carbon Emissions: A Transition toward Low-Carbon Energy Systems—A Critical Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-38, August.
    20. Chong, Chin Hao & Zhou, Xiaoyong & Zhang, Yongchuang & Ma, Linwei & Bhutta, Muhammad Shoaib & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2023. "LMDI decomposition of coal consumption in China based on the energy allocation diagram of coal flows: An update for 2005–2020 with improved sectoral resolutions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16335-:d:1288664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.