IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15113-d1264264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Planning for Depot Location and Line Planning Problems in the Intercity Railway Network with Passenger Demand Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Zanyang Cui

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shang Yuan Cun, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Zhimei Wang

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shang Yuan Cun, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Junhua Chen

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shang Yuan Cun, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Xingchen Zhang

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shang Yuan Cun, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Chunxiao Zhao

    (School of Mathematics, Renmin University of China, No. 59 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100872, China)

Abstract

In this study, we present a mathematical model and solution approach for addressing the robust integrated intercity railway depot location and line planning problem (RIDLLPP), which encompasses the initial two stages of the railway planning process. Our primary objective is to identify depot locations that exhibit robustness across a range of likely future scenarios, and this is achieved by incorporating line planning decisions. The model focuses on five critical strategic determinations, namely the depot location, depot storage capacity, line operation, passenger assignment, and fleet allocation. To tackle this complex problem, we propose an iterative solution framework that combines the Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm with improved rounding heuristics (DE-IRH). To evaluate the effectiveness of our framework, we conduct a comparative analysis with the Gurobi solver using multiple medium-sized artificial instances. The results demonstrate that our proposed framework achieves an optimality gap of 4.87% while requiring less computational time. Furthermore, we validate the robustness of the model’s location choices across various input scenarios, thereby providing valuable insights for transportation planning agencies and railway companies that can inform their decision-making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Zanyang Cui & Zhimei Wang & Junhua Chen & Xingchen Zhang & Chunxiao Zhao, 2023. "Integrated Planning for Depot Location and Line Planning Problems in the Intercity Railway Network with Passenger Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15113-:d:1264264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gutierrez, Genaro J. & Kouvelis, Panagiotis & Kurawarwala, Abbas A., 1996. "A robustness approach to uncapacitated network design problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 362-376, October.
    2. Goossens, Jan-Willem & van Hoesel, Stan & Kroon, Leo, 2006. "On solving multi-type railway line planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 403-424, January.
    3. Tönissen, D.D. & Arts, J.J., 2018. "Economies of scale in recoverable robust maintenance location routing for rolling stock," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 360-377.
    4. Siyang Xie & Xi Chen & Zhaodong Wang & Yanfeng Ouyang & Kamalesh Somani & Jing Huang, 2016. "Integrated Planning for Multiple Types of Locomotive Work Facilities Under Location, Routing, and Inventory Considerations," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 391-408, October.
    5. Owen, Susan Hesse & Daskin, Mark S., 1998. "Strategic facility location: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 423-447, December.
    6. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    7. Dönmez, Zehranaz & Kara, Bahar Y. & Karsu, Özlem & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2021. "Humanitarian facility location under uncertainty: Critical review and future prospects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. David Canca & Alicia De-Los-Santos & Gilbert Laporte & Juan A. Mesa, 2016. "A general rapid network design, line planning and fleet investment integrated model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 127-144, November.
    9. Ralf Borndörfer & Martin Grötschel & Marc E. Pfetsch, 2008. "Models for Line Planning in Public Transport," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Mark Hickman & Pitu Mirchandani & Stefan Voß (ed.), Computer-aided Systems in Public Transport, pages 363-378, Springer.
    10. Claessens, M. T. & van Dijk, N. M. & Zwaneveld, P. J., 1998. "Cost optimal allocation of rail passenger lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 474-489, November.
    11. Canca, David & Barrena, Eva, 2018. "The integrated rolling stock circulation and depot location problem in railway rapid transit systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 115-138.
    12. Denise D. Tönissen & Joachim J. Arts & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2019. "Maintenance Location Routing for Rolling Stock Under Line and Fleet Planning Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1252-1270, September.
    13. Aikens, C. H., 1985. "Facility location models for distribution planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 263-279, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tönissen, D.D. & Arts, J.J., 2020. "The stochastic maintenance location routing allocation problem for rolling stock," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. De Rosa, Vincenzo & Gebhard, Marina & Hartmann, Evi & Wollenweber, Jens, 2013. "Robust sustainable bi-directional logistics network design under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 184-198.
    3. Ansari, Sina & Başdere, Mehmet & Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Smilowitz, Karen, 2018. "Advancements in continuous approximation models for logistics and transportation systems: 1996–2016," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 229-252.
    4. Renata Turkeš & Kenneth Sörensen & Daniel Palhazi Cuervo, 2021. "A matheuristic for the stochastic facility location problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 649-694, August.
    5. Schiewe, Alexander & Schiewe, Philine & Schmidt, Marie, 2019. "The line planning routing game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 560-573.
    6. Kress, Dominik & Pesch, Erwin, 2012. "Sequential competitive location on networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 483-499.
    7. Santoso, Tjendera & Ahmed, Shabbir & Goetschalckx, Marc & Shapiro, Alexander, 2005. "A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 96-115, November.
    8. Felipe Caro & Kumar Rajaram & Jens Wollenweber, 2012. "Process Location and Product Distribution with Uncertain Yields," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1050-1063, October.
    9. Sauvey, Christophe & Melo, Teresa & Correia, Isabel, 2019. "Two-phase heuristics for a multi-period capacitated facility location problem with service-differentiated customers," Technical Reports on Logistics of the Saarland Business School 16, Saarland University of Applied Sciences (htw saar), Saarland Business School.
    10. Rodolfo Mendoza-Gómez & Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado & Karla B. Valenzuela-Ocaña, 2019. "An Efficient Decision-Making Approach for the Planning of Diagnostic Services in a Segmented Healthcare System," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1631-1665, September.
    11. David Canca & Belén Navarro-Carmona & Gabriel Villa & Alejandro Zarzo, 2023. "A Multilayer Network Approach for the Bimodal Bus–Pedestrian Line Planning Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-36, October.
    12. Sanjay Dominik Jena & Jean-François Cordeau & Bernard Gendron, 2015. "Dynamic Facility Location with Generalized Modular Capacities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 484-499, August.
    13. Yang, Zhongzhen & Yu, Shunan & Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "Airport location in multiple airport regions (MARs): The role of land and airside accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 98-110.
    14. Varsei, Mohsen & Polyakovskiy, Sergey, 2017. "Sustainable supply chain network design: A case of the wine industry in Australia," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 236-247.
    15. Olivares-Benitez, Elias & Ríos-Mercado, Roger Z. & González-Velarde, José Luis, 2013. "A metaheuristic algorithm to solve the selection of transportation channels in supply chain design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 161-172.
    16. Gustavo Rodrigues de Morais & Yuri Clements Daglia Calil & Gabriel Faria de Oliveira & Rodney Rezende Saldanha & Carlos Andrey Maia, 2023. "A Sustainable Location Model of Transshipment Terminals Applied to the Expansion Strategies of the Soybean Intermodal Transport Network in the State of Mato Grosso, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, January.
    17. Chloe Kim Glaeser & Marshall Fisher & Xuanming Su, 2019. "Optimal Retail Location: Empirical Methodology and Application to Practice," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 86-102, January.
    18. Schuster Puga, Matías & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2017. "A heuristic algorithm for solving large location–inventory problems with demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 413-423.
    19. Roba W. Salem & Mohamed Haouari, 2017. "A simulation-optimisation approach for supply chain network design under supply and demand uncertainties," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1845-1861, April.
    20. Häntsch, Marius & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2016. "Correct accounting for duty drawbacks with outward and inward processing in global production networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 111-127.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15113-:d:1264264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.