IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15068-d1263309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes and Pro-Environmental Behavior of Representatives of Generation Z from the Example of Poland and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Andruszkiewicz

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Mariola Grzybowska-Brzezińska

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Grzywińska-Rąpca

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Paweł Dariusz Wiśniewski

    (Collegium of Socio-Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Generation Z (Gen Z) accounts for 40% of the world’s consumer population. Its representatives set the market trends that will shape products and services in the near future. Taking into account the potential and characteristics of Gen Z, it seems reasonable to ask questions such as the following: To what extent are young people engaged in pro-environmental actions? Is awareness of the state of environmental degradation and consumer pragmatism related to nationality? The main purpose of this article is to assess the attitudes and pro-environmental behavioral patterns of young consumers in Poland and Germany. We conducted a review of studies available in the literature related to trends in the behavior of consumers from Gen Z and the greening of consumption. Moreover, we carried out empirical research using CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing) methodology, with the participation of representatives of Gen Z. This study showed differences between Gen Z representatives from Poland and those from Germany in terms of their attitudes and declarations towards pro-environmental market behavioral patterns. This research has revealed a higher sensitivity towards the degradation of the environment among young consumers from Germany and has shown a lower level of environmental awareness among the representatives of Gen Z from Poland.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Andruszkiewicz & Mariola Grzybowska-Brzezińska & Małgorzata Grzywińska-Rąpca & Paweł Dariusz Wiśniewski, 2023. "Attitudes and Pro-Environmental Behavior of Representatives of Generation Z from the Example of Poland and Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15068-:d:1263309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15068/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15068/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gul Shah Sabary & Lukáš Durda & Arif Ibne Asad & Aleksandr Kljuènikov, 2023. "Key motivational factors behind Asian immigrant entrepreneurship: A causal relationship analysis employing the DEMATEL approach for Germany," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 18(1), pages 287-318, March.
    2. Zuzana Virglerova & Eva Ivanova & Jan Dvorsky & Jaroslav Belas & Tomáš Krulický, 2021. "Selected factors of internationalisation and their impact on the SME perception of the market risk," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 1011-1032, December.
    3. Duong Cong Doanh & Katarzyna Gadomska-Lila & Le Thi Loan, 2021. "Antecedents of green purchase intention: a cross-cultural empirical evidence from Vietnam and Poland," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 935-971, December.
    4. Yao Song & Zhenzhen Qin & Zihao Qin, 2020. "Green Marketing to Gen Z Consumers in China: Examining the Mediating Factors of an Eco-Label–Informed Purchase," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    5. Igor Borisov & Szergej Vinogradov, 2022. "Inclusiveness as a key determinant of work engagement: evidence from V4 countries," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(4), pages 1015-1050, December.
    6. Gul Shah Sabary & Aleksandr Kljuènikov, 2023. "Barriers to immigrant entrepreneurship: A causal relationship analysis of the Asian immigrant entrepreneurs in Germany employing the DEMATEL approach," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 18(2), pages 491-522, June.
    7. Roberts, James A. & Bacon, Donald R., 1997. "Exploring the Subtle Relationships between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 79-89, September.
    8. Malgorzata Grzywinska-Rapca, 2021. "Economic Welfare and Subjective Assessments of Financial Situation of European Households," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 948-968.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malin Jonell & Beatrice Crona & Kelsey Brown & Patrik Rönnbäck & Max Troell, 2016. "Eco-Labeled Seafood: Determinants for (Blue) Green Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Carter, Kealy & Jayachandran, Satish & Murdock, Mitchel R., 2021. "Building A Sustainable Shelf: The Role of Firm Sustainability Reputation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 507-522.
    3. Jaiswal, Deepak & Kant, Rishi, 2018. "Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 60-69.
    4. Marilia Bossle & Marcia de Barcellos & Luciana Vieira, 2015. "Eco-innovative food in Brazil: perceptions from producers and consumers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Eva M. Murgado-Armenteros & María Gutierrez-Salcedo & Francisco José Torres-Ruiz, 2020. "The Concern about Biodiversity as a Criterion for the Classification of the Sustainable Consumer: A Cross-Cultural Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Kamyar Kianpour & Maryam Asghari, 2012. "Importance of Price for Buying Environmentally Friendly Products," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 4(6), pages 371-375.
    7. Mariusz Czupich & Justyna Łapińska & Vojtěch Bartoš, 2022. "Environmental Sustainability Assessment of the European Union’s Capital Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Sandra Ferreira & Olga Pereira, 2023. "Antecedents of Consumers’ Intention and Behavior to Purchase Organic Food in the Portuguese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Chirag Malik & Neeraj Singhal, 2017. "Consumer Environmental Attitude and Willingness to Purchase Environmentally Friendly Products: An SEM Approach," Vision, , vol. 21(2), pages 152-161, June.
    10. Tandon, Anushree & Dhir, Amandeep & Kaur, Puneet & Kushwah, Shiksha & Salo, Jari, 2020. "Why do people buy organic food? The moderating role of environmental concerns and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    11. Jean-Marie Codron & Lucie Siriex & Thomas Reardon, 2006. "Social and environmental attributes of food products in an emerging mass market: Challenges of signaling and consumer perception, with European illustrations," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 23(3), pages 283-297, October.
    12. Wilson Kong & Amran Harun & Rini Suryati Sulong & Jaratin Lily, 2014. "The Influence of Consumers Perception of Green Products on Green Purchase Intention," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(8), pages 924-939, August.
    13. Johan Jansson, 2011. "Consumer eco‐innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 192-210, March.
    14. Zhongfu Tan & Burhan Sadiq & Tayyeba Bashir & Hassan Mahmood & Yasir Rasool, 2022. "Investigating the Impact of Green Marketing Components on Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Brand Image and Brand Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Grunert, Klaus G. & Hieke, Sophie & Wills, Josephine, 2014. "Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 177-189.
    16. Franky Varah & Mirinchonme Mahongnao & Deep Jyoti Francis & Tuisem Shimrah, 2020. "Measuring environmental attitudes and behaviors: a study of undergraduate students in Delhi," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1291-1306, August.
    17. Jui-Che Tu & Ya-Wen Tu & Tai-Ran Wang, 2018. "An Investigation of the Effects of Infographics and Green Messages on the Environmental Attitudes of Taiwanese Online Shoppers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Kalamas, Maria & Cleveland, Mark & Laroche, Michel, 2014. "Pro-environmental behaviors for thee but not for me: Green giants, green Gods, and external environmental locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 12-22.
    19. Andrea Szilagyi & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Laura Bacali & Elena-Simina Lakatos & Andreea-Loredana Birgovan, 2022. "Consumers in the Circular Economy: A Path Analysis of the Underlying Factors of Purchasing Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    20. Abdul Waheed & Qingyu Zhang & Yasir Rashid & Muhammad Sohail Tahir & Muhammad Wasif Zafar, 2020. "Impact of green manufacturing on consumer ecological behavior: Stakeholder engagement through green production and innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1395-1403, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15068-:d:1263309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.