IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14368-d1250678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability-Oriented Assessment of Fuel Cells—A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Annika Tampe

    (Department of Management Accounting and Control, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Kristina Höse

    (Department of Management Accounting and Control, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Uwe Götze

    (Department of Management Accounting and Control, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany)

Abstract

Enhancing the sustainability of activities is an undebatable need for decision makers regarding the economy as well as society. Fuel cells and their application in different areas, such as energy supply or mobility, are viewed as a promising means towards more sustainability. However, fuel cells as well as fuel-cell-based application systems cause a couple of possibly conflictive impacts in terms of ecological, economic, and social targets—their positive contribution to sustainability is not confident. Consequently, a significant assessment of sustainability is needed to enable a targeted development of fuel cells and their application systems, including the selection of alternative design variants. Furthermore, such assessment is necessary to provide evidence for the intended improvements and thereby contribute to market success and implementation of the systems. However, an overview of the existing methods for sustainability-related assessment of fuel cells and fuel-cell-based systems as well as the outcomes of the assessments does not exist. Therefore, a systematic literature review is conducted without restriction of fuel cell types and evaluation methods. Such a comprehensive overview does not yet exist to the best of the authors’ knowledge. With regard to the suggested or applied methods, the results show, amongst others, that the economic assessment does not refer to the methodical state-of-art, the social dimension is neglected, and an overall assessment of sustainability, aggregating all three dimensions, is not conducted. Due to the variety of analyzed objects as well as applied methods, the outcomes of the studies provide not more than scattered knowledge about the relevance of components and the advantageousness of fuel cells, their variants, and their application systems regarding sustainability. To contribute to avoiding methodological deficiencies, a procedure model for an integrated assessment is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Annika Tampe & Kristina Höse & Uwe Götze, 2023. "Sustainability-Oriented Assessment of Fuel Cells—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-33, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14368-:d:1250678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jem Bendell, 2022. "Replacing Sustainable Development: Potential Frameworks for International Cooperation in an Era of Increasing Crises and Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Marta Gandiglio & Fabrizio De Sario & Andrea Lanzini & Silvia Bobba & Massimo Santarelli & Gian Andrea Blengini, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Biogas-Fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Integrated in a Wastewater Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Mitja Mori & Rok Stropnik & Mihael Sekavčnik & Andrej Lotrič, 2021. "Criticality and Life-Cycle Assessment of Materials Used in Fuel-Cell and Hydrogen Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Aleksandar Lozanovski & Nicole Whitehouse & Nathanael Ko & Simon Whitehouse, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Fuel Cell Buses in Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Eugene Yin Cheung Wong & Danny Chi Kuen Ho & Stuart So & Chi-Wing Tsang & Eve Man Hin Chan, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Electric Vehicles and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles Using the GREET Model—A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Khalid Al-Khori & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi & Samir Boulfrad & Muammer Koç, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment for Integration of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells into Gas Processing Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Yang, Zijun & Wang, Bowen & Jiao, Kui, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of fuel cell, electric and internal combustion engine vehicles under different fuel scenarios and driving mileages in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Daniel Garraín & Santacruz Banacloche & Paloma Ferreira-Aparicio & Antonio Martínez-Chaparro & Yolanda Lechón, 2021. "Sustainability Indicators for the Manufacturing and Use of a Fuel Cell Prototype and Hydrogen Storage for Portable Uses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Chen, Wei-Ming & Kim, Hana, 2020. "Energy, economic, and social impacts of a clean energy economic policy: Fuel cells deployment in Delaware," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Khaled M. A. Salim & Ruhanita Maelah & Hawa Hishamuddin & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, 2022. "Two Decades of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs): A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Rillo, E. & Gandiglio, M. & Lanzini, A. & Bobba, S. & Santarelli, M. & Blengini, G., 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of biogas-fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 585-602.
    12. Cheng, Cai & Cherian, Jacob & Sial, Muhammad Safdar & Zaman, Umer & Niroumandi, Hosein, 2021. "Performance assessment of a novel biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell power generation cycle; Economic analysis and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Wagner, U. & Eckl, R. & Tzscheutschler, P., 2006. "Energetic life cycle assessment of fuel cell powertrain systems and alternative fuels in Germany," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 3062-3075.
    14. Lu, Qiang & Zhang, Bo & Yang, Shichun & Peng, Zhaoxia, 2022. "Life cycle assessment on energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    15. Agostini, Alessandro & Belmonte, Nadia & Masala, Alessio & Hu, Jianjiang & Rizzi, Paola & Fichtner, Maximilian & Moretto, Pietro & Luetto, Carlo & Sgroi, Mauro & Baricco, Marcello, 2018. "Role of hydrogen tanks in the life cycle assessment of fuel cell-based auxiliary power units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Schäfer, Andreas & Heywood, John B. & Weiss, Malcolm A., 2006. "Future fuel cell and internal combustion engine automobile technologies: A 25-year life cycle and fleet impact assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 2064-2087.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khaled M. A. Salim & Ruhanita Maelah & Hawa Hishamuddin & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, 2022. "Two Decades of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs): A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Renzhi Lyu & Zhenpo Wang & Zhaosheng Zhang, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment Based on Whole Industry Chain Assessment of FCEVs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Wang, Dawei & Zamel, Nada & Jiao, Kui & Zhou, Yibo & Yu, Shuhai & Du, Qing & Yin, Yan, 2013. "Life cycle analysis of internal combustion engine, electric and fuel cell vehicles for China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 402-412.
    4. Çalışır, Duran & Ekici, Selcuk & Midilli, Adnan & Karakoc, T. Hikmet, 2023. "Benchmarking environmental impacts of power groups used in a designed UAV: Hybrid hydrogen fuel cell system versus lithium-polymer battery drive system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    5. Simons, Andrew & Bauer, Christian, 2015. "A life-cycle perspective on automotive fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 884-896.
    6. Stropnik, R. & Sekavčnik, M. & Ferriz, A.M. & Mori, M., 2018. "Reducing environmental impacts of the ups system based on PEM fuel cell with circular economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 824-835.
    7. Yan, Xiaoyu & Crookes, Roy J., 2009. "Life cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for road transportation fuels in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2505-2514, December.
    8. Ren, Maohui & Zhou, Tao & Wang, ChenXi, 2024. "New energy vehicle innovation network, innovation resources agglomeration externalities and energy efficiency: Navigating industry chain innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Evers, V.H.M. & Kirkels, A.F. & Godjevac, M., 2023. "Carbon footprint of hydrogen-powered inland shipping: Impacts and hotspots," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    10. Desreveaux, A. & Bouscayrol, A. & Trigui, R. & Hittinger, E. & Castex, E. & Sirbu, G.M., 2023. "Accurate energy consumption for comparison of climate change impact of thermal and electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    11. Liu, Yajie & Dong, Feng & Wang, Yulong & Li, Jingyun & Qin, Chang, 2023. "Assessment of the energy-saving and environment effects of China's gasoline vehicle withdrawal under the impact of geopolitical risks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    12. Maketo, Lydia & Ashworth, Peta, 2025. "Social acceptance of green hydrogen in European Union and the United Kingdom: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    13. Florenta Dinita & George Barjoveanu & Carmen Teodosiu, 2025. "An Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment of End-of-Life Vehicles Management in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Dong, Weijie & He, Guoqing & Cui, Quansheng & Sun, Wenwen & Hu, Zhenlong & Ahli raad, Erfan, 2022. "Self-scheduling of a novel hybrid GTSOFC unit in day-ahead energy and spinning reserve markets within ancillary services using a novel energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    15. Ding, Xiaoyi & Lv, Xiaojing & Weng, Yiwu, 2019. "Coupling effect of operating parameters on performance of a biogas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine hybrid system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    16. Lu, Qiang & Zhang, Bo & Yang, Shichun & Peng, Zhaoxia, 2022. "Life cycle assessment on energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    17. Guo, Yi & Tang, Yuming & Wang, Lingzi & Wang, Yuli & Peng, Xueyuan, 2024. "Optimal design of operating frequency for the ionic liquid compressor applied in hydrogen storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    18. Ingrao, Carlo & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Adamczyk, Janusz & Ferrante, Valentina & Messineo, Antonio & Huisingh, Donald, 2019. "Investigating energy and environmental issues of agro-biogas derived energy systems: A comprehensive review of Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 296-307.
    19. Chen, Leyuan & Wang, Yao & Jiang, Yancui & Zhang, Caizhi & Liao, Quan & Li, Jun & Wu, Jihao & Gao, Xin, 2024. "Life cycle assessment of liquid hydrogen fuel for vehicles with different production routes in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    20. Kühne, Reinhart, 2010. "Electric buses – An energy efficient urban transportation means," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4510-4513.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14368-:d:1250678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.