IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14357-d1250341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial Carbon Footprint (ICF) Calculation Approach Based on Bayesian Cross-Validation Improved Cyclic Stacking

Author

Listed:
  • Yichao Xie

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
    Key Laboratory of Integrated Energy Optimization and Secure Operation of Liaoning Province, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

  • Bowen Zhou

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
    Key Laboratory of Integrated Energy Optimization and Secure Operation of Liaoning Province, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

  • Zhenyu Wang

    (State Grid Electric Power Research Institute Wuhan Efficiency Evaluation Company Limited, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Bo Yang

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
    Key Laboratory of Integrated Energy Optimization and Secure Operation of Liaoning Province, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

  • Liaoyi Ning

    (State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Supply Co., Ltd., Panjin Electric Power Supply Company, Panjin 124010, China)

  • Yanhui Zhang

    (Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China)

Abstract

Achieving carbon neutrality is widely regarded as a key measure to mitigate climate change. The industrial carbon footprint (ICF) calculation, as a foundation to achieve carbon neutrality, primarily relies on roughly estimating direct carbon emissions based on information disclosed by industries. However, these estimates may not be comprehensive, timely, and accurate. This paper elaborates on the issue of ICF calculation, dividing a factory’s carbon emissions into carbon emissions directly produced by appliances and electricity consumption carbon emissions, to estimate the total carbon emissions of the factory. An appliance identification method is proposed based on a cyclic stacking method improved by Bayesian cross-validation, and an appliance state correction module SHMM (state-corrected hidden Markov model) is added to identify the state of the appliance and then to calculate the corresponding appliance carbon emissions. Electricity consumption carbon emissions come from the factory’s electricity consumption and the marginal carbon emission factor of the connected bus. Regarding the selection of artificial intelligence models and cross-validation technique required in the appliance identification method, this paper compares the effects of 7 cross-validation techniques, including stratified K-fold, K-fold, Monte Carlo, etc., on 14 machine learning algorithms such as AdaBoost, XGBoost, feed-forward network, etc., to determine the technique and algorithms required for the final appliance identification method. Experiment results show that the proposed appliance identification method estimates device carbon emissions with an error of less than 3%, which is significantly superior to other models, demonstrating that the proposed approach can achieve comprehensive and accurate ICF calculation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yichao Xie & Bowen Zhou & Zhenyu Wang & Bo Yang & Liaoyi Ning & Yanhui Zhang, 2023. "Industrial Carbon Footprint (ICF) Calculation Approach Based on Bayesian Cross-Validation Improved Cyclic Stacking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-35, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14357-:d:1250341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Priyanka & Dharmender Kumar, 2020. "Decision tree classifier: a detailed survey," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 246-269.
    2. Li, Shupeng & Niu, Liping & Yue, Qiang & Zhang, Tingan, 2022. "Trajectory, driving forces, and mitigation potential of energy-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China's primary aluminum industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    3. Nguyen, Quyen & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Kuruppuarachchi, Duminda, 2021. "Predicting corporate carbon footprints for climate finance risk analyses: A machine learning approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Kedong Yin & Lu Liu & Haolei Gu, 2022. "Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Benedetto-Giuseppe Risi & Francesco Riganti-Fulginei & Antonino Laudani, 2022. "Modern Techniques for the Optimal Power Flow Problem: State of the Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Antonio Ruano & Alvaro Hernandez & Jesus Ureña & Maria Ruano & Juan Garcia, 2019. "NILM Techniques for Intelligent Home Energy Management and Ambient Assisted Living: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-29, June.
    7. Zhiqiang Yin & Lin Shi & Junru Luo & Shoukun Xu & Yang Yuan & Xinxin Tan & Jiaqun Zhu, 2023. "Pump Feature Construction and Electrical Energy Consumption Prediction Based on Feature Engineering and LightGBM Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeremi Assael & Thibaut Heurtebize & Laurent Carlier & François Soupé, 2023. "Greenhouse gases emissions: estimating corporate non-reported emissions using interpretable machine learning," Working Papers hal-03905325, HAL.
    2. İsmail Hakkı Çavdar & Vahit Feryad, 2021. "Efficient Design of Energy Disaggregation Model with BERT-NILM Trained by AdaX Optimization Method for Smart Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Saima Akhtar & Sulman Shahzad & Asad Zaheer & Hafiz Sami Ullah & Heybet Kilic & Radomir Gono & Michał Jasiński & Zbigniew Leonowicz, 2023. "Short-Term Load Forecasting Models: A Review of Challenges, Progress, and the Road Ahead," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, May.
    4. Gourlay, Sydney & Kilic, Talip & Martuscelli, Antonio & Wollburg, Philip & Zezza, Alberto, 2021. "Viewpoint: High-frequency phone surveys on COVID-19: Good practices, open questions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Cristina Puente & Rafael Palacios & Yolanda González-Arechavala & Eugenio Francisco Sánchez-Úbeda, 2020. "Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring (NILM) for Energy Disaggregation Using Soft Computing Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Ivana Krtolica & Dragan Savić & Bojana Bajić & Snežana Radulović, 2022. "Machine Learning for Water Quality Assessment Based on Macrophyte Presence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Haltor Mataifa & Senthil Krishnamurthy & Carl Kriger, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of the Particle Swarm Optimization and Primal-Dual Interior-Point Algorithms for Transmission System Volt/VAR Optimization in Rectangular Voltage Coordinates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-29, September.
    8. Francisco Porles-Ochoa & Ruben Guevara, 2023. "Moderation of Clean Energy Innovation in the Relationship between the Carbon Footprint and Profits in CO₂e-Intensive Firms: A Quantitative Longitudinal Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Popescu, Ioana-Stefania & Gibon, Thomas & Hitaj, Claudia & Rubin, Mirco & Benetto, Enrico, 2023. "Are SRI funds financing carbon emissions? An input-output life cycle assessment of investment funds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    10. Hernandez-Matheus, Alejandro & Löschenbrand, Markus & Berg, Kjersti & Fuchs, Ida & Aragüés-Peñalba, Mònica & Bullich-Massagué, Eduard & Sumper, Andreas, 2022. "A systematic review of machine learning techniques related to local energy communities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Andrea Mariscotti, 2022. "Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring Applied to AC Railways," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Malki, Zohair & Atlam, El-Sayed & Hassanien, Aboul Ella & Dagnew, Guesh & Elhosseini, Mostafa A. & Gad, Ibrahim, 2020. "Association between weather data and COVID-19 pandemic predicting mortality rate: Machine learning approaches," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Sarra Houidi & Dominique Fourer & François Auger & Houda Ben Attia Sethom & Laurence Miègeville, 2021. "Comparative Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring Methods Using Relevant Features and Transfer Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, May.
    14. Wang Gao & Jiajia Wei & Shixiong Yang, 2023. "The Asymmetric Effects of Extreme Climate Risk Perception on Coal Futures Return Dynamics: Evidence from Nonparametric Causality-In-Quantiles Tests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Muhammed-Fatih Kaya, 2022. "Pattern Labelling of Business Communication Data," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1203-1234, December.
    16. Veronica Piccialli & Antonio M. Sudoso, 2021. "Improving Non-Intrusive Load Disaggregation through an Attention-Based Deep Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Debnath, Ramit & Bardhan, Ronita & Misra, Ashwin & Hong, Tianzhen & Rozite, Vida & Ramage, Michael H., 2022. "Lockdown impacts on residential electricity demand in India: A data-driven and non-intrusive load monitoring study using Gaussian mixture models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Everton Luiz de Aguiar & André Eugenio Lazzaretti & Bruna Machado Mulinari & Daniel Rodrigues Pipa, 2021. "Scattering Transform for Classification in Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Christos Athanasiadis & Dimitrios Doukas & Theofilos Papadopoulos & Antonios Chrysopoulos, 2021. "A Scalable Real-Time Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring System for the Estimation of Household Appliance Power Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Zheng Liu & Maryam Majidi & Haonan Wang & Denis Mende & Martin Braun, 2023. "Time Series Optimization-Based Characteristic Curve Calculation for Local Reactive Power Control Using Pandapower - PowerModels Interface," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14357-:d:1250341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.