IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13018-d1228092.html

Embedding Technology Interface and Digital Payment Drivers in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model: Transforming Behavioral Intention to Sustained Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Savita Gupta

    (Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Patiala 147004, India)

  • Ravi Kiran

    (Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Patiala 147004, India)

  • Rakesh Kumar Sharma

    (Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Patiala 147004, India)

Abstract

Purpose: The present study was undertaken with the purpose of embedding Technology Interface drivers and Digital Payment drivers as additional drivers in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) to examine their influence on the Behavioral Intention of online shoppers. Technology Interface drivers include chatbots (CBs) and virtual try-on (VTO) technology. Further, this study also links Behavioral Intention with Sustained Intention to analyze whether it translates into repeated online buying. Research Methods: The study is based on a survey instrument using snowball sampling with data collected from 600 consumers from northern India. The study uses PLS-SEM for gauging the association of UTAUT2 drivers, Technology Interface drivers, and Digital Payment drivers with Behavioral Intention. Findings/Results: The results show a positive and significant association with Behavioral Intention of Technology Interface drivers and Digital Payment drivers as additional drivers to UTAUT2 drivers. UTAUT2 drivers had the highest impact (β: 0.465), followed by Digital Payment and Technology Interface drivers (β: 0.263 and β: 0.211). Further examination suggests a positive impact of Behavioral Intention on Sustained Intention (β: 0.868). The outcomes reflect that the model explained 69.5% of the variation in Behavioral Intention and 75.4% of the variation in Sustained Intention. Implications: The study suggests that Indian managers need to adopt DPM as a support service to make online shopping a worthwhile experience. Technology Interface drivers have a comparatively lower coefficient, indicating that in India, they are yet to reach the optimum level for consumers to adopt them fully. Efforts to transform Behavioral Intention into repeated online buying or Sustained Intention may go a long way in building a strong, committed community of online sellers to assist in enhancing customer experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Savita Gupta & Ravi Kiran & Rakesh Kumar Sharma, 2023. "Embedding Technology Interface and Digital Payment Drivers in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model: Transforming Behavioral Intention to Sustained Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13018-:d:1228092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13018/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13018/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    2. Jadil, Yassine & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model in the mobile banking literature: The moderating role of sample size and culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 354-372.
    3. Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2020. "Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Naciye Güliz Uğur & Aykut Hamit Turan, 2018. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: E-learning adoption of academicians: a proposal for an extended model," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 393-405, April.
    5. Tzu-Hsin Chu & Cheng-Min Chao & Hsieh-Hsi Liu & Der-Fa Chen, 2022. "Developing an Extended Theory of UTAUT 2 Model to Explore Factors Influencing Taiwanese Consumer Adoption of Intelligent Elevators," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    6. Ramon Palau-Saumell & Santiago Forgas-Coll & Javier Sánchez-García & Emilio Robres, 2019. "User Acceptance of Mobile Apps for Restaurants: An Expanded and Extended UTAUT-2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Urvashi Tandon & Ravi Kiran & Ash N. Sah, 2018. "The influence of website functionality, drivers and perceived risk on customer satisfaction in online shopping: an emerging economy case," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 57-91, February.
    8. Liebrecht, Christine & Tsaousi, Christina & van Hooijdonk, Charlotte, 2021. "Linguistic elements of conversational human voice in online brand communication: Manipulations and perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 124-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K Padma Kiran & Naga Sailaja Vedala, 2025. "Assessing Unified Payments Interface (UPI) adoption and usage through the interplay of UTAUT factors," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Junzhe & Opute, Abdullah Promise & Jawad, Caroline & Zhan, Meng, 2025. "The influence of artificial intelligence chatbot problem solving on customers’ continued usage intention in e-commerce platforms: an expectation-confirmation model approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Sebastián Molinillo & Elena Higueras-Castillo, 2022. "Do biometric payment systems work during the COVID-19 pandemic? Insights from the Spanish users' viewpoint," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Sonali Singh & Sumeet Singh Jasial & Richa Misra & Ajay Bansal, 2024. "Online Retail Service Quality: What Matters Most for Customer Satisfaction?," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 13(5), pages 600-615, October.
    4. Tingting Liu & Zichen Zheng & Zhichao Wen & Shangyun Wu & Yaru Liu & Jing Cao & Zhixiong Weng, 2022. "Factors Influencing Residents’ Behavior in Internet Recycling: From the Perspective of the Adoption of New Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Meennapa Rukhiran & Napasorn Phaokla & Paniti Netinant, 2022. "Adoption of Environmental Information Chatbot Services Based on the Internet of Educational Things in Smart Schools: Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, November.
    6. Li, Meichan & Wang, Rui, 2023. "Chatbots in e-commerce: The effect of chatbot language style on customers’ continuance usage intention and attitude toward brand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Schmidt, Sebastian & Saraceni, Adriana, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen, 2021. "Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on public managers’ attitudes toward digital transformation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Si Xu & Pengfei Chen & Ge Zhang, 2024. "Exploring Chinese University Educators’ Acceptance and Intention to Use AI Tools: An Application of the UTAUT2 Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    10. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    11. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo & Charles Mallans Rambo & Charles Misiko Wafula, 2024. "Hedging Derivatives and Performance of Renewable Energy Projects in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(8), pages 619-630, August.
    13. Deepak, 2016. "Antecedent Value of Professional Commitment and Job Involvement in Determining Job Satisfaction," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 41(2), pages 154-164, May.
    14. Marianela Denegri & María Baeza & Natalia Salinas-Oñate & Verónica Peñaloza & Horacio Miranda & Ligia Orellana, 2014. "Materialism in Pedagogy Students in Chile," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 505-521, June.
    15. Tomislav Letnik & Katja Hanžič & Giuseppe Luppino & Matej Mencinger, 2022. "Impact of Logistics Trends on Freight Transport Development in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Julia Eichholz & Thorsten Knauer & Sandra Winkelmann, 2023. "Digital Maturity of Forecasting and its Impact in Times of Crisis," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 443-481, December.
    17. Zhihui Wang & Liangzhen Nie & Eila Jeronen & Lihua Xu & Meiai Chen, 2023. "Understanding the Environmentally Sustainable Behavior of Chinese University Students as Tourists: An Integrative Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. repec:bjc:journl:v:8:y:2022:i:12:p:28-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    20. repec:plo:pone00:0155225 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Kang, Min Jung & Park, Heejun, 2011. "Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3465-3475, June.
    22. repec:plo:pone00:0121767 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. chatterjee, susmita, 2017. "Empowerment translated to transition," MPRA Paper 80067, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13018-:d:1228092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.