IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p12859-d1224975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Consumer’s Adaptation to the Creative Culture of Theme Parks on Review Usefulness

Author

Listed:
  • Shugang Li

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Qian Dou

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Hui Chen

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Zhaoxu Yu

    (Department of Automation, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

Abstract

In the era of information overload and repetitive reviews, there has been limited exploration into the influence of consumers’ cultural adaptation to creative symbols in theme parks on the usefulness of online reviews, which is significant for enhancing tourism experiences, targeted marketing, personalized services, and informed tourism choices. This study aims to bridge this gap by examining how cultural adaptation factors interact and impact the review usefulness, and by considering the role of cultural adaptation in simplifying information during consumer decision-making processes. Additionally, the study investigates how consumers’ decision reference points, represented by advanced ticket levels, moderate their attention to attribute consistency when evaluating the review usefulness. A sample of 5929 valid consumer reviews of Disney theme parks from 2019 to 2022 on Meituan.com is analyzed using latent semantic analysis and Tobit regression to test the proposed hypotheses. We find that high symbolic creativity reviews stimulate cultural adaptation and increase attention to service attributes when evaluating review usefulness. Moreover, advanced ticket levels do not moderate the usefulness of extremely negative reviews. However, they do have a moderating effect on the usefulness of extremely positive reviews, with the direction of moderation differing based on the levels of symbolic creativity.

Suggested Citation

  • Shugang Li & Qian Dou & Hui Chen & Zhaoxu Yu, 2023. "The Impact of Consumer’s Adaptation to the Creative Culture of Theme Parks on Review Usefulness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12859-:d:1224975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12859/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12859/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Zhiwei & Park, Sangwon, 2015. "What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-151.
    2. Jiang, Hong & Ren, Xinhui, 2019. "Model of passenger behavior choice under flight delay based on dynamic reference point," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 51-60.
    3. Shu-Hua Chang, 2022. "Eliciting Brand Loyalty with Elements of Customer Experience: A Case Study on the Creative Life Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Kim, Junghun & Park, Stephen Youngjun & Lee, Jongsu, 2018. "Do people really want renewable energy? Who wants renewable energy?: Discrete choice model of reference-dependent preference in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 761-770.
    5. Russo, J Edward & Leclerc, France, 1994. "An Eye-Fixation Analysis of Choice Processes for Consumer Nondurables," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(2), pages 274-290, September.
    6. Cheng, Yi-Hsiu & Ho, Hui-Yi, 2015. "Social influence's impact on reader perceptions of online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 883-887.
    7. Dong, Ping & Siu, Noel Yee-Man, 2013. "Servicescape elements, customer predispositions and service experience: The case of theme park visitors," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 541-551.
    8. Bettman, James R & Luce, Mary Frances & Payne, John W, 1998. "Constructive Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(3), pages 187-217, December.
    9. Chen, Ching-Fu & Phou, Sambath, 2013. "A closer look at destination: Image, personality, relationship and loyalty," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 269-278.
    10. Johnson, Michael D, 1984. "Consumer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable Alternatives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(3), pages 741-753, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basu, Shankha & Savani, Krishna, 2017. "Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 76-91.
    2. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Blut, Markus & Chowdhry, Nivriti & Mittal, Vikas & Brock, Christian, 2015. "E-Service Quality: A Meta-Analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 679-700.
    4. Moradi, Masoud & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2023. "Differential effects of analytical versus emotional rhetorical style on review helpfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Shao, Wei & Lye, Ashley & Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn, 2009. "Different strokes for different folks: A method to accommodate decision -making heterogeneity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 495-501.
    6. Yani Wang & Jun Wang & Tang Yao, 2019. "What makes a helpful online review? A meta-analysis of review characteristics," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 257-284, June.
    7. Raoofpanah, Iman & Zamudio, César & Groening, Christopher, 2023. "Review reader segmentation based on the heterogeneous impacts of review and reviewer attributes on review helpfulness: A study involving ZIP code data," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Tamao Miura & Shoji Yamamoto, 2022. "Analysis of Factors Influencing the Choice between Ownership and Sharing: Qualitative and Quantitative Survey Results on Car Sharing Service Users Conducted in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Hee Jin Kim & Song Oh Yoon, 2016. "The effect of category label specificity on consumer choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 765-777, December.
    10. Savannah Wei Shi & Michel Wedel & F. G. M. (Rik) Pieters, 2013. "Information Acquisition During Online Decision Making: A Model-Based Exploration Using Eye-Tracking Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1009-1026, May.
    11. Zuschke, Nick, 2020. "The impact of task complexity and task motivation on in-store marketing effectiveness: An eye tracking analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 337-350.
    12. Roest, Henk & Rindfleisch, Aric, 2010. "The influence of quality cues and typicality cues on restaurant purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 10-18.
    13. Srivastava, Vartika & Kalro, Arti D., 2019. "Enhancing the Helpfulness of Online Consumer Reviews: The Role of Latent (Content) Factors," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 33-50.
    14. Wästlund, Erik & Otterbring, Tobias & Gustafsson, Anders & Shams, Poja, 2015. "Heuristics and resource depletion: eye-tracking customers’ in situ gaze behavior in the field," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 95-101.
    15. Elena Reutskaja & Rosemarie Nagel & Colin F. Camerer & Antonio Rangel, 2011. "Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(2), pages 900-926, April.
    16. Yi, Jisu & Oh, Yun Kyung, 2022. "The informational value of multi-attribute online consumer reviews: A text mining approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Leask, Anna, 2016. "Visitor attraction management: A critical review of research 2009–2014," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 334-361.
    18. Lien Thi Kim Nguyen & Hao-Hsuan Chung & Kristine Velasquez Tuliao & Tom M. Y. Lin, 2020. "Using XGBoost and Skip-Gram Model to Predict Online Review Popularity," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    19. Elisa Monnot & Fanny Reniou & Béatrice Parguel & Leila Elgaaied-Gambier, 2019. "“Thinking Outside the Packaging Box”: Should Brands Consider Store Shelf Context When Eliminating Overpackaging?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 355-370, January.
    20. , & ,, 2011. "Search, choice, and revealed preference," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 6(1), January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12859-:d:1224975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.