IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p12012-d1210860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simplified Equation for Calculating the Water Quality Index (WQI), Kalu River, Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Kushan D. Siriwardhana

    (Water Resources Management and Soft Computing Research Laboratory, Millennium City, Athurugiriya 10150, Sri Lanka)

  • Dimantha I. Jayaneththi

    (Water Resources Management and Soft Computing Research Laboratory, Millennium City, Athurugiriya 10150, Sri Lanka)

  • Ruchiru D. Herath

    (Water Resources Management and Soft Computing Research Laboratory, Millennium City, Athurugiriya 10150, Sri Lanka)

  • Randika K. Makumbura

    (Water Resources Management and Soft Computing Research Laboratory, Millennium City, Athurugiriya 10150, Sri Lanka)

  • Hemantha Jayasinghe

    (Central Environmental Authority, Denzil Kobbekaduwa Mawatha, Battaramulla 10120, Sri Lanka)

  • Miyuru B. Gunathilake

    (Hydrology and Aquatic Environment, Environment and Natural Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy and Research, 1433 Ås, Norway
    Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, Faculty of Technology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland)

  • Hazi Md. Azamathulla

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine P.O. Box 331310, Trinidad and Tobago)

  • Kiran Tota-Maharaj

    (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Infrastructure & Sustainable Engineering, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aston University Birmingham, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK)

  • Upaka Rathnayake

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Construction, Faculty of Engineering and Design, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland)

Abstract

The water supply system plays a major role in the community. The water source is carefully selected based on quality, quantity, and reliability. The quality of water at its sources is continuously deteriorating due to various anthropogenic activities and is a major concern to public health as well. The Kalu River is one of the major water resources in Sri Lanka that supplies potable water to the Kalutara district (a highly populated area) and Rathnapura district. But, there has been no significant research or investigation to examine anthropogenic activities in the river. Due to this, it is difficult to find any proper study related to the overall water quality in the Kalu River. Therefore, this study covers a crucial part related to the water quality of the Kalu River. The spatiotemporal variation of river water quality is highly important not only to processing any treatment activities but also to implementing policy decisions. In this context, water quality management is a global concern as countries strive to meet the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 6, which aims to ensure the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all. Poor water quality can have severe consequences on human health, ecosystems, and economies. Contaminated water sources pose risks of waterborne diseases, reduced agricultural productivity, and ecological imbalances. Hence, assessing and improving water quality is crucial for achieving sustainable development worldwide. Therefore, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis of spatiotemporal analysis of the water quality of the Kalu River using the water quality data of eight locations for 6 years from 2017 to 2023. Nine water quality parameters, including the pH, electrical conductivity, temperature, chemical oxygen demand, biological oxygen demand, total nitrate, total phosphate, total sulfate, total chlorine, and hardness, were used to develop a simple equation to investigate the water quality index (WQI) of the river. Higher WQI values were not recorded near the famous Kalutara Bridge throughout the years, even though the area is highly urbanized and toured due to religious importance. Overall, the water quality of the river can be considered acceptable based on the results of the WQI. The country lockdowns due to COVID-19 might have impacted the results in 2020; this can be clearly seen with the variation of the annual WQI average, as it clearly indicates decreased levels of the WQI in the years 2020 and 2021, and again, the rise of the WQI level in 2022, as this time period corresponds to the lockdown season and relaxation of the lockdown season in the country. Somehow, for most cases in the Kalu River, the WQI level is well below 25, which can be considered acceptable and suitable for human purposes. But, it may need some attention towards the areas to find possible reasons that are not in the range. Nevertheless, the results suggest the importance of continuous water quality monitoring in the Kalu River.

Suggested Citation

  • Kushan D. Siriwardhana & Dimantha I. Jayaneththi & Ruchiru D. Herath & Randika K. Makumbura & Hemantha Jayasinghe & Miyuru B. Gunathilake & Hazi Md. Azamathulla & Kiran Tota-Maharaj & Upaka Rathnayake, 2023. "A Simplified Equation for Calculating the Water Quality Index (WQI), Kalu River, Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12012-:d:1210860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12012/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12012/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiran Tota-Maharaj & Parneet Paul, 2015. "Sustainable Approaches for Stormwater Quality Improvements with Experimental Geothermal Paving Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Chamara P. Liyanage & Koichi Yamada, 2017. "Impact of Population Growth on the Water Quality of Natural Water Bodies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Easterly, William, 2009. "How the Millennium Development Goals are Unfair to Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 26-35, January.
    4. Mariana M. Vaccaro & Alberto García-Liñeiro & Alicia Fernández-Cirelli & Alejandra V. Volpedo, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Water in Sport Equine Production in Argentina: A Case Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-8, November.
    5. Berthet, Alice & Vincent, Audrey & Fleury, Philippe, 2021. "Water quality issues and agriculture: An international review of innovative policy schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dawn C. Parker & Kathryn H. Jacobsen & Maction K. Komwa, 2009. "A Qualitative Study of the Impact of HIV/AIDS on Agricultural Households in Southeastern Uganda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Kenneth Harttgen & Stephan Klasen, 2010. "Fragility and MDG Progress: How useful is the Fragility Concept?," Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth - Discussion Papers 41, Courant Research Centre PEG.
    3. Dang, Hai-Anh H. & Serajuddin, Umar, 2020. "Tracking the sustainable development goals: Emerging measurement challenges and further reflections," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    4. Laura Camfield & Andrew Crabtree & Keetie Roelen, 2013. "Editorial: Poverty, Vulnerability and Resilience in a Post-2015 World," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 599-608, September.
    5. Maxim Pinkovskiy & Xavier Sala-i-Martin, 2014. "Africa is on time," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 311-338, September.
    6. Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko & Greenstein, Joshua & Stewart, David, 2013. "How Should MDG Success and Failure be Judged: Faster Progress or Achieving the Targets?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 19-30.
    7. Winthrop, Rebecca & Anderson, Kate & Cruzalegui, Inés, 2015. "A review of policy debates around learning in the post-2015 education and development agenda," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 297-307.
    8. Afolabi Tunde Ahmed & Imran Ur Rahman, 2020. "The Impact of FDI and Foreign Aid on the Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 4(6), pages 53-70.
    9. Benjamin Leo, 2010. "Who Are the MDG Trailblazers? A New MDG Progress Index," Working Papers id:2926, eSocialSciences.
    10. Martin Ravallion, 2012. "Why Don't We See Poverty Convergence?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 504-523, February.
    11. William Joe & Udaya Shankar Mishra, 2015. "On Reckoning Level Differentials in the Measurement of Progress: An Illustration in the Context of Deliveries Assisted by Skilled Health Personnel," IEG Working Papers 352, Institute of Economic Growth.
    12. Jose Antonio Alonso & Ana Luiza Cortez & Stephan Klasen, 2014. "LDC and other country groupings: How useful are current approaches to classify countries in a more hetergeneous developing world?," CDP Background Papers 021, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    13. Temple, Jonathan R.W., 2010. "Aid and Conditionality," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Dani Rodrik & Mark Rosenzweig (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 4415-4523, Elsevier.
    14. Saroj Kumar & Abhishek Kumar & Rakesh Kumar & William Joe, 2021. "Social Demographics and Health Achievements An Ecological Analysis of Institutional Delivery and Immunization Coverage in India," IEG Working Papers 427, Institute of Economic Growth.
    15. Mirzaei, Mohsen & Jafari, Ali & Gholamalifard, Mehdi & Azadi, Hossein & Shooshtari, Sharif Joorabian & Moghaddam, Saghi Movahhed & Gebrehiwot, Kindeya & Witlox, Frank, 2020. "Mitigating environmental risks: Modeling the interaction of water quality parameters and land use cover," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Maria Lo Bue & Stephan Klasen, 2013. "Identifying Synergies and Complementarities Between MDGs: Results from Cluster Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 647-670, September.
    17. Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, 2013. "Global Development Goal Setting as a Policy Tool for Global Governance: Intended and Unintended Consequences," Working Papers 108, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    18. Taylor, Stephen & Spaull, Nicholas, 2015. "Measuring access to learning over a period of increased access to schooling: The case of Southern and Eastern Africa since 2000," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 47-59.
    19. Wang, Hao & Jasim, Abbas & Chen, Xiaodan, 2018. "Energy harvesting technologies in roadway and bridge for different applications – A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1083-1094.
    20. Jacob, Arun, 2017. "Mind the Gap: Analyzing the Impact of Data Gap in Millennium Development Goals’ (MDGs) Indicators on the Progress toward MDGs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 260-278.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12012-:d:1210860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.