IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10945-d1192602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examination of Higher Education Teachers’ Self-Perception of Digital Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Facilitating Conditions: An Empirical Study in the Context of China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaorui Wang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zuwang Chu

    (Institute of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

In the digital age, it is necessary for higher education teachers to improve their digital competence to face the challenges of the advancement of technology. Because there are few studies on the digital competence of higher education teachers in the context of Asia, the aim of this study was to describe Chinese higher education teachers’ self-perceptions of digital competence and investigate the effects of self-efficacy and facilitating conditions and how they predict teachers’ digital competence. For this purpose, a quantitative methodology was used. A final sample of 525 in-service higher education teachers from China completed the questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, inferential analysis, and latent variable path analysis. The results indicate, first, that teachers’ general perception of digital competence was at a high level, and of the seven competence areas, values, ethics, and security, digital resources, and continuing professional development areas ranked among the top four, respectively, based on their means. Significant differences were observed in the digital competence of teachers with regard to different levels of education, disciplines, and institutional categories. Second, according to the results of structural equation modeling, facilitating conditions were positively and significantly correlated with teachers’ self-efficacy and digital competence. In addition, self-efficacy exerted a significantly positive impact on teachers’ digital competence. Finally, self-efficacy was found to mediate the relationship between facilitating conditions and teachers’ digital competence. Implications are suggested for developing teachers’ digital competence according to the findings of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaorui Wang & Zuwang Chu, 2023. "Examination of Higher Education Teachers’ Self-Perception of Digital Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Facilitating Conditions: An Empirical Study in the Context of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10945-:d:1192602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amer Mutrik Sayaf & Mahdi Mohammed Alamri & Mohammed Ayid Alqahtani & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi, 2021. "Information and Communications Technology Used in Higher Education: An Empirical Study on Digital Learning as Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Yu Zhao & Ana María Pinto Llorente & María Cruz Sánchez Gómez & Liping Zhao, 2021. "The Impact of Gender and Years of Teaching Experience on College Teachers’ Digital Competence: An Empirical Study on Teachers in Gansu Agricultural University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates & Kazuo Okamura & Masayo Fujimoto, 1995. "Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 423-444, August.
    4. Maria José Sousa & Ana Lúcia Marôco & Sónia P. Gonçalves & Andreia de Bem Machado, 2022. "Digital Learning Is an Educational Format towards Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Asma Fahim & Qingmei Tan & Bushra Naz & Qurat ul Ain & Sibghat Ullah Bazai, 2021. "Sustainable Higher Education Reform Quality Assessment Using SWOT Analysis with Integration of AHP and Entropy Models: A Case Study of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    7. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 398-427, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianyang Huang, 2023. "Using SOR framework to explore the driving factors of older adults smartphone use behavior," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2020. "Why distance matters: The relatedness between technology development and its appropriation in smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. de Vaujany, François-Xavier, 2001. "American and European social embeddedness in IS research: the case of structurational approaches," MPRA Paper 1318, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Nathalie Mitev & Matthew Smith & Isabelle Walsh, 2017. "Renewing Literature Reviews in MIS Research? A Critical Realist Approach," Working Papers hal-01648133, HAL.
    4. Russell L. Purvis & V. Sambamurthy & Robert W. Zmud, 2001. "The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 117-135, April.
    5. Nayef Shaie Alotaibi, 2022. "The Significance of Digital Learning for Sustainable Development in the Post-COVID19 World in Saudi Arabia’s Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (Wanda Janina), 1999. "Technologies-in-practice : an enacted lens for studying technology in organizations," Working papers WP 4056-99., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    7. Tim Edwards & Rick Delbridge & Max Munday, 2007. "A Critical Assessment of the Evaluation of EU Interventions for Innovation in the SME Sector in Wales," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(12), pages 2429-2447, November.
    8. Alain Pinsonneault & Kenneth L. Kraemer, 2002. "Exploring the Role of Information Technology in Organizational Downsizing: A Tale of Two American Cities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 191-208, April.
    9. de Vaujany, François-Xavier & Fomin, Wlad, 2006. "Design in practice: bridging the gap between design and use dichotomies in practice-based studies," MPRA Paper 1313, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Dong, Shutao, 2012. "Decision execution mechanisms of IT governance: The CRM case," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 147-157.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4820 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Hughes, Gemma & Moore, Lucy & Maniatopoulos, Gregory & Wherton, Joseph & Wood, Gary W. & Greenhalgh, Trisha & Shaw, Sara, 2022. "Theorising the shift to video consulting in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of a mixed methods study using practice theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    13. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    14. Bilgihan, Anil & Madanoglu, Melih & Ricci, Peter, 2016. "Service attributes as drivers of behavioral loyalty in casinos: The mediating effect of attitudinal loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 14-21.
    15. Kareklas, Ioannis & Muehling, Darrel D. & King, Skyler, 2019. "The effect of color and self-view priming in persuasive communications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 33-49.
    16. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Aaron K. Chatterji & Michael Findley & Nathan M. Jensen & Stephan Meier & Daniel Nielson, 2016. "Field experiments in strategy research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 116-132, January.
    17. Yi Yong Lee & Chin Lay Gan & Tze Wei Liew, 2023. "Thwarting Instant Messaging Phishing Attacks: The Role of Self-Efficacy and the Mediating Effect of Attitude towards Online Sharing of Personal Information," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-23, February.
    18. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    19. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Nosheena Yasir & Nasir Mahmood & Hafiz Shakir Mehmood & Osama Rashid & An Liren, 2021. "The Integrated Role of Personal Values and Theory of Planned Behavior to Form a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    21. Jianzhuang Zheng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Lifeng Chen, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Affect ESG Ratings and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10945-:d:1192602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.